1,720,969 research outputs found
Additional file 5 of The prevalence of electronic cigarettes vaping globally: a systematic review and meta-analysis
No full textAdditional file 5: Fig S2. Pooled lifetime and current prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping by subgroups in men
Table_1_Validity and reliability of anxiety literacy (A-Lit) and its relationship with demographic variables in the Iranian general population.DOCX
No full textIntroductionAnxiety disorder is one of the most common mental disorders. This cross-sectional research aimed to determine anxiety literacy (A-Lit) psychometric properties among the Iranian population in 2022.MethodsThis research was conducted on 690 people in Iran in 2022. In this study, people were selected by proportional stratified sampling, and the validity and reliability of the A-Lit designed by Griffiths were assessed. Validity of A-Lit was assessed by face validity, content validity, and confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability of A-Lit was evaluated by the McDonald’s omega coefficient, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and test– retest. In analytical sections, the tests of One-way ANOVA, Chi-squared test, and independent samples t-test were used.ResultsThe rates of S-CVI/Ave and CVR for A-Lit were 0.922 and 0.774, respectively. In confirmatory factor analysis, three items were deleted because the factor loading was less than 0.4, and goodness-of-fit indexes (Some of goodness-of-fit indexes: χ2/df = 4.175, GFI: 0.909, RMSEA = 0.068, PCFI = 0.745, AGFI = 0.883) were confirmed as the final model with 19 items. For all items, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.832, the McDonald’s omega coefficient was 0.835, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.874. According to the results of this study, 1.3% (n = 9) did not answer any questions correctly and 8.4% (n = 58) were able to answer 1–6 questions correctly. Approximately 72% (n = 495) were able to answer 7–12 questions, and eventually only 18.6% (n = 128) were able to answer 13 questions and more. There was a significant relationship between sex, age group, occupation status, marital status, and get information related to mental illness with A-Lit level (p ConclusionThe Persian version of A-Lit was confirmed with 19 items, and this scale is a reliable tool for measuring A-Lit in the general population. The results also showed that a few people have a higher level of anxiety literacy and that educational and intervention programs need to be designed and implemented for the public population.</p
Additional file 11 of The prevalence of electronic cigarettes vaping globally: a systematic review and meta-analysis
No full textAdditional file 11: Fig S8. Cumulative meta-analysis of current prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping in ex-smokers and current smokers. Pooled lifetime and current prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping by subgroups in women
Additional file 13 of The prevalence of electronic cigarettes vaping globally: a systematic review and meta-analysis
No full textAdditional file 13: Fig S10. Cumulative meta-analysis of lifetime and current prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping by subgroups in men
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Additional file 3 of The prevalence of electronic cigarettes vaping globally: a systematic review and meta-analysis
No full textAdditional file 3: Table S2. Qualities of studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis
Additional file 14 of The prevalence of electronic cigarettes vaping globally: a systematic review and meta-analysis
No full textAdditional file 14: Fig S11. Cumulative meta-analysis of lifetime and current prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping by subgroups in women in every continent
Additional file 15 of The prevalence of electronic cigarettes vaping globally: a systematic review and meta-analysis
No full textAdditional file 15: Fig S12. Cumulative meta-analysis of lifetime and current prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping by subgroups in men in every continent
Additional file 12 of The prevalence of electronic cigarettes vaping globally: a systematic review and meta-analysis
No full textAdditional file 12: Fig S9. Cumulative meta-analysis of lifetime and current prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping by subgroups in women
- …
