1,720,988 research outputs found

    Religion, chemin d'humanité

    No full text
    Magnard Pierre. Religion, chemin d'humanité. In: Revue théologique de Louvain, 39ᵉ année, fasc. 3, 2008. pp. 315-328

    Magnard (Pierre). Le Dieu des philosophes

    No full text
    Jerphagnon Lucien. Magnard (Pierre). Le Dieu des philosophes. In: Revue belge de philologie et d'histoire, tome 72, fasc. 1, 1994. Antiquité — Oudheid. pp. 176-177

    Religion, chemin d'humanité

    No full text
    Magnard Pierre. Religion, chemin d'humanité. In: Revue théologique de Louvain, 39ᵉ année, fasc. 3, 2008. pp. 315-328

    Réponse du professeur P. Magnard

    No full text
    Magnard Pierre. Réponse du professeur P. Magnard. In: Revue Philosophique de Louvain. Quatrième série, tome 92, n°2-3, 1994. pp. 316-321

    Réponse du professeur P. Magnard

    No full text
    Magnard Pierre. Réponse du professeur P. Magnard. In: Revue Philosophique de Louvain. Quatrième série, tome 92, n°2-3, 1994. pp. 316-321

    Qu’est-ce qu’une Renaissance ?

    No full text
    Magnard Pierre. Qu’est-ce qu’une Renaissance ?. In: Cahiers du GADGES n°4, 2006. Éducation, transmission, rénovation à la Renaissance. pp. 19-27

    Les Sources antiques de l'humanisme moderne

    No full text
    Magnard Pierre. Les Sources antiques de l'humanisme moderne. In: Tradition classique et modernité. Actes du 12ème colloque de la Villa Kérylos à Beaulieu-sur-Mer les 19 & 20 octobre 2001. Paris : Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 2002. pp. 147-156. (Cahiers de la Villa Kérylos, 13

    Prix Cardinal Mercier 1995

    No full text
    Magnard Pierre, Aubert Roger, Desmond William. Prix Cardinal Mercier 1995. In: Revue Philosophique de Louvain. Quatrième série, tome 96, n°4, 1998. pp. 765-777

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore