325,040 research outputs found
Michael K. Magill, M.D.
No full textDr Magill earned his AB from Dartmouth College. Dr Magill graduated from Duke University Medical School and completed both his internship and residency at DUMC. Dr Magill served on the faculty of the University of Arizona in the Department of Community and Family Medicine from 1981-1986. Dr Magill was associated with the Tallahassie Memorial Regional Medical Center from 1986-1994 serving first as Director of the Family Medicine Residency Program and later as Vice President for Medical Education and Outreach. Dr Magill came to the University of Utah in 1994 where he founded the Utah Area Health Education Center Program. Dr Magill was Chair of the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine from 1995-2016. From 2012-2015 Dr Magill was Executive Medical Director of the University of Utah Health Plans. For 10 years Dr Magill was Executive Medical Director of the University of Utah Hospitals and Clinics/Community Physician Group. Dr Magill is a past president of the Association of of Departments of Family Medicine. Dr Magill is Emeritus Professor in both the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Magill, J M, VX30814
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/401047Surname: MAGILL. Given Name(s) or Initials: J M. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: VX30814. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 9197.220693
Item: [2016.0049.33340] "Magill, J M, VX30814
Magill, A M, WX16886
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/401049Surname: MAGILL. Given Name(s) or Initials: A M. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: WX16886. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 33645.220695
Item: [2016.0049.33342] "Magill, A M, WX16886
Magill, J A, VX40963
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/401048Surname: MAGILL. Given Name(s) or Initials: J A. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: VX40963. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 8930.220694
Item: [2016.0049.33341] "Magill, J A, VX40963
Magill Waterworks 42 and 43 Vic., 1879, No. 144
No full textAn Act to authorise the construction of a Tank and other Works for the purpose of affording a Supply of Water to the District of Magill. W. rep., 269/1882, s. 2Digitising of this publication was funded by a grant from the Law Foundation of South Australia, Incorporated
International Encyclopedia of Psychology vol 1/ Edt; Frank N. Magill
No full textterdiri atas 2 vol.; 30 cm
International Encyclopedia of Psychology vol.2/ Edt; Frank N. Magill
No full textterdiri atas 2 vol.; 30 cm
Diffusive author(s), cohesive author: Analysis of S/N (1994)
No full textThis study indicates the ways in which various aspects of the author(s) are brought forth in Dumb type’s performance art, the S/N production. Previous research has suggested a non-hierarchical organization of Dumb type and the absence of a “privileged author” in Dumb type’s collaborative work, S/N. However, the results that I have investigated from member’s interviews on the creative process of S/N along with my analysis of the recorded images of S/N, indicate a different aspect of the author(s). First, S/N was created through, so to speak, the collective ideas of the members of Dumb type. Further, S/N has at least nine quotations from previous performances, installations, and printed writings, besides the work-in-progress technique. Explicating one of the “author functions” as given by Michel Foucault, each text has plural subjects of the author. However, it has been revealed from members’ interviews that Teiji Furuhashi had a decision-making role in selecting the members’ ideas within the performance. Since then, S/N has had plural subjects of creation; however, Furuhashi is one of the subjects of creation along with the “privileged author.” S/N has plural authors (diffusive authors) yet at the same time, it has a “privileged author,” Teiji Furuhashi (cohesive author)
Feature interaction: a critical review and considered forecast
No full textThe state of the art of the field of feature interactions in telecommunications services is reviewed, concentrating on three major research trends: software engineering approaches, formal methods, and on line techniques. Then, the impact of the new, emerging architectures on the feature interaction problem is considered. A forecast is made about how research in feature interactions needs to readjust to address the new challenges posed by the emerging architectures
Modified vs. Standard Magill Forceps in Difficult Nasal Intubation with Respect to 3 Different Laryngoscopes
No full textEinleitung: Die nasale Intubation setzt sich aus zwei Schritten zusammen: 1. Herstellung der Sicht auf die Glottis; 2. Einführen des Endotrachealtubus. Im Rahmen schwieriger nasaler INtubation kann der erste Schritt durch indirekte Laryngoskopieverfahren erleichtert werden, während der zweite Schritt von der Sicht unabhängig und technisch schwierig sein kann. Üblicherweise wird für den zweiten Schritt der Einsatz einer Magill-Zange empfohlen. Da die Magill-Zange auf die direkte Laryngoskopie abgestimmt ist, stellt sich die Frage, ob diese Zange für die indirekten Laryngoskopieverfahren geeignet ist. Daher haben wir bei Patienten mit zu erwartenden schwierigen nasalen Intubationen den Erfolg einer geraden (alt) Magill-Zange mit einer gebogenen (neu) Zange im Einsatz bei drei verschiedenen indirekten Laryngoskopen (Airtraq, Glidescope, C-Mac) verglichen.
Methoden: Nach Zustimmung der Ethikkommission wurde bei 120 Patienten mit einer erwarteten schwierigen nasalen Intubation (Mundöffnung < 2,5 cm, Mallampati IV, Anamnese einer schwierigen Intubation) nach Randomisierung ein Intubationsversuch mit Airtraq, Glidescope oder C-Mac Laryngoskop durchgeführt. Nach Visualisierung der Glottis wurde versucht, aus dem Nasenrachenraum einen Eschmann-Stab je nach Randomisierung zuerst mit der geraden oder gebogenen Zange in den Kehlkopf zu führen. Danach wurde der Stab zurückgezogen und der Versuch mit der alternativen Zange wiederholt. Es wurden der Erfolg, die Zeit für die Interventionen, die Sicht nach Cormack & Lehane und die gesamte Intubationszeit bestimmt (Mittelwert ± SD, X²-Test; p < 0,05).
Ergebnisse: Alle Patienten konnten mit einem der Laryngoskope intubiert werden. Es gab keinen Unterschied in der Erfolgsrate der drei Laryngoskope. Intubationen mit dem Airtraq dauerten trotz signifikant besserer Sicht (p = 0,0044) signifikant länger (Airtraq 116 ± 56 s; Glidescope 87 ± 48 s; C-Mac 84 ± 40 s; p = 0,0115), was auf eine signifikant längere Zeit bei dem Einsatz der beiden Zangen zurückzuführen ist . Die Erfolgsrate im Einsatz der geraden Zange war signifikant kleiner als bei der gebogenen (p < 0,0001).
Schlussfolgerung: Trotz bester Sicht auf die Glottis dauert die Intubation mit dem Airtraq und dem Einsatz einer Zange signifikant länger. Wenn im Rahmen schwieriger nasaler Intubation indirekte Laryngoskope eingesetzt werden, sollte zur Optimierung der Intubationsbedingungen eine gebogene, d.h. den Laryngoskopen angepasste Zange zur Verfügung stehen.Introduction: In nasal intubations visualization of the glottis and advancement of the endotracheal tube can be independently difficult. For visualization of the glottis indirect laryngoscopes have been developed, while for the advancement of the tube a Magill forceps is recommended. However, it is unclear whether a conventional straight Magill forceps is effective in combination with indirect laryngoscopes. Therefore, we tested in patients(,) with expected difficult nasal intubation(,) the applicability of a standard vs. modified forceps in combination with three different laryngoscopes.
Methods: 150 patients, scheduled for nasal endotracheal intubation, were randomized for intubation with an Airtraq (n=50), Glidescope (n=50), or C-Mac (n=50) laryngoscope. In each patient both forceps were used to advance an Eschmann stylet into the larynx. All patients had at least one risk factor for a difficult intubation (mouth opening ≤ 2.5 cm, Malampati score IV, history of difficult intubation, obvious tumor). Success rate, visualization of the glottis, time for advancement of the stylet and for intubation were evaluated.
Results: Intubation was successful in all of the patients with one of the laryngoscopes. Advancement of an Eschmann stylet was significantly more successful with a modified vs. standard forceps (93% vs. 65%; p<0.0001). Time for this procedure was significantly longer for the standard forceps for all intubations (3830s vs. 1919s, p<0.0001) and for each laryngoscope.
Conclusion: For difficult nasal intubations with indirect laryngoscopes the modified Magill forceps was superior in success rate and time. Independent of the type of the indirect laryngoscope a modified Magill forceps can be recommended
- …
