1,720,973 research outputs found
Investigational drugs targeting somatostatin receptors for treatment of acromegaly and neuroendocrine tumors.
No full textNTRODUCTION:
Octreotide long-acting release (LAR) and lanreotide Autogel (ATG) are the two somatostatin analogs currently approved for treatment of acromegaly and neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The strength of these drugs has been their specificity for somatostatin receptor subtype 2. However, this peculiarity may become a weakness in some patients with tumors harboring somatostatin receptors different from the subtype 2. Another clinically relevant aspect related to the use of octreotide LAR and lanreotide ATG is the burden of injectable drug regimen that may adversely impact the quality of life of patients with acromegaly and NETs.
AREAS COVERED:
The authors review the recently published evidence on novel drugs targeting somatostatin receptors developed for treating acromegaly and NETs. Within this article, the authors discuss: i) the pharmacology of somatostatin and traditional somatostatin analogs; ii) the efficacy and safety of multireceptor-targeted somatostatin analogs in acromegaly and NETs; iii) the efficacy of chimeric molecules in acromegaly and NETs; iv) the preliminary data on the use of new injectable, oral and transdermal formulations of octreotide in acromegaly.
EXPERT OPINION:
The development of new somatostatin analogs and new formulations has opened a new scenario for treatment of acromegaly and NETs. That being said, even though there have been big steps taken in the development of new therapies for acromegaly, there are still a number of unresolved issues, while more trials are necessary for the use of somatostatin anaologs in the treatment of NETs
INSL3: a marker of Leydig cell function and testis-bone-skeletal muscle network
No full textThis article reviews the role of INSL3 as biomarker of Leydig cell function and its systemic action in testis-boneskeletal muscle crosstalk in adult men. Insulin-like factor 3 (INSL3) is a peptide hormone secreted constitutively in a differentiation-dependent mode by testicular Leydig cells. Besides the role for the testicular descent, this hormone has endocrine anabolic functions on the bone-skeletal muscle unit. INSL3 levels are low in many conditions of undifferentiated or altered Leydig cell status, however the potential clinical utility of INSL3 measurement is not yet well defined. INSL3 levels are modulated by the long-term cytotropic effect of the hypothalamic- pituitary-gonadal axis, unlike testosterone that is acutely sensitive to the stimulus by luteinizing hormone (LH). INSL3 directly depend on the number and differentiation state of Leydig cells and therefore it represents the ideal marker of Leydig cell function. This hormone is more sensitive than testosterone to Leydig cell impairment, and the reduction of INSL3 in adult men can precociously detect an endocrine testicular dysfunction. Low INSL3 levels could cause or contribute to some symptoms and signs of male hypogonadism, above all sarcopenia and osteoporosis. The evidence provided, suggested that the measurement of INSL3 levels should be considered in the clinical management of male hypogonadism and in the evaluation of testicular endocrine function. The monitoring of INSL3 levels could allow an early detection of Leydig cell damage, even when testosterone levels are still in the normal range
Protein Markers in Osteoporosis
No full textOsteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue. Biomarkers of bone turnover have been used for years in bone disease management, especially to determine response to treatment. They are substances found in biological fluids, produced during the bone remodelling process. Recently, new approaches for the detection of bone physiology and pathology biomarkers have been proposed, among which proteomics, with particular interest in osteoporosis. The objective of this manuscript is to review current knowledge on proteomics applied to osteoporosis in vivo. The analysis of the 14 studies published to date showed a range of proteins whose expression is altered in patients with osteoporosis. The relatively small number of papers depends mainly on high costs and technical limitations; due to the difficulty to collect osteoclasts, most of the studies performed proteomics on peripheral blood monocytes (PBMs), already accepted as an excellent osteoporosis cell model in vivo. Among the identified proteins, the most promising are represented by Gelsolin (GSN), Annexin A2 (ANXA2), and Prolyl 4-hydroxylase (P4HB). They have been related to bone mineral density (BMD), sometimes in apparent disagreement (some upregulated and others downregulated in patients with low BMD). Finally, worthy of mention is the application of proteomics in the emerging field of microvesicles (MVs); they are important messengers, widely present in body fluids, and have recently emerged as novel targets for the diagnosis of multiple diseases, among which musculoskeletal diseases. In conclusion, the proteomic field is relatively novel in osteoporosis and has a considerable but theoretical potential; further investigations are needed in order to make proteome-derived markers applicable to clinical practice
Contemporary genetics-based diagnostics of male infertility
No full textIntroduction Thousands of genes are implicated in spermatogenesis, testicular development and endocrine regulation of testicular function. The genetic contribution to male infertility is therefore considerable, and basic and clinical research in the last years found a number of genes that could potentially be used in clinical practice. Research has also been pushed by new technologies for genetic analysis. However, genetic analyses currently recommended in standard clinical practice are still relatively few. Areas covered We review the genetic causes of male infertility, distinguishing those already approved for routine clinical application from those that are still not supported by adequate clinical studies or those responsible for very rare cause of male infertility. Genetic causes of male infertility vary from chromosomal abnormalities to copy number variations (CNVs), to single-gene mutations. Expert opinion Clinically, the most important aspect is related to the correct identification of subjects to be tested and the right application of genetic tests based on clear clinical data. A correct application of available genetic tests in the different forms of male infertility allows receiving a better and defined diagnosis, has an important role in clinical decision (treatment, prognosis), and allows appropriate genetic counseling especially in cases that should undergo assisted reproduction techniques
MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Male osteoporosis: diagnosis and management. Should the treatment and target be the same as for female osteoporosis?
No full textMale osteoporosis has been neglected for too long time and there is need for a change. This condition is clearly under-estimated, under-diagnosed and under-treated. The diagnosis is often made late in the natural history of the pathology or even after a fracture event. Guidelines on screening politics do not agree whether and when men should be considered, and clinical trials are far less performed in men with respect to women. Actually, most of our knowledge on male osteoporosis, especially regarding treatment, is extrapolate from the female counterpart. Male osteoporosis is frequently secondary to other conditions and often associated with comorbidities. Therefore, identification of specific causes of male osteoporosis is essential to drive a correct and personalized treatment. Moreover, men have more osteoporosis-related complications and higher mortality rate associated with fractures. Furthermore, not only fewer men receive a correct and timely diagnosis, but also fewer men receive adequate treatment, and adherence to therapy is far less in men than in women. Of note, very few studies assessed the effect of anti-osteoporotic treatments in men and most of them considered only bone density as primary endpoint. This review focuses on the areas that are still nebulous in male osteoporosis field, from identification of subjects who need to be evaluated for osteoporosis and screening programs dealing with primary prevention, to diagnostic procedures for good estimates of bone quantity and quality and precise calculation of fracture risk, and personalized treatment that take into account the pathophysiology of osteoporosis
Bone turnover, bone mineral density, and fracture risk in acromegaly: a meta-analysis
No full textGH excess causes an increase in bone turnover, but the consequences in terms of skeletal fragility have long been uncertain due to the heterogeneity of studies dealing with this topic
Biomarkers of Acromegaly and Growth Hormone Action
No full textBiological markers (biomarkers) play a key role in drug development, regulatory approval and clinical care of patients and are linked to clinical and surrogate outcomes. Both acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency (GHD) are pathological conditions related to important comorbidities that, in addition to having stringent diagnostic criteria, require valid markers for the definition of treatment, treatment monitoring and follow-up. GH and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) are the main biomarkers of GH action in children and adults while, in acromegaly, both GH and IGF-I are established biomarkers of disease activity. However, although GH and IGF-I are widely validated biomarkers of GHD and acromegaly, their role is not completely exhaustive or suitable for clinical classification and follow-up. Therefore, new biological markers for acromegaly and GH replacement therapy are strongly needed. The aim of this paper is to review and summarize the current state in the field pointing out new potential biomarkers for acromegaly and GH use/abuse
Bone turnover, bone mineral density, and fracture risk in acromegaly: a meta-analysis
No full textGH excess causes an increase in bone turnover, but the consequences in terms of skeletal fragility have long been uncertain due to the heterogeneity of studies dealing with this topic
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
