323,505 research outputs found
Maddocks, C G, NX13124
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/401012Surname: MADDOCKS. Given Name(s) or Initials: C G. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: NX13124. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 9513.220658
Item: [2016.0049.33305] "Maddocks, C G, NX13124
Schedopontocypris Maddocks 1969
No full textGenus SCHEDOPONTOCYPRIS Maddocks, 1969 b 20. * S. ? maculata Schornikov, 1973 Schornikov, 1973: 59 (Propontocypris (S. ?) m.); Aladin & Schornikov, 1986 b: 830, 831 (Propontocypris m.); Aladin, 1987: 820 (Propontocypris m.); Matyushin & Fedotov, 1992: 34 (Propontocypris m.); 1993: 86 (Propontocypris m.); Schornikov, 1997: 95 (Propontocypris (S. ?) m.); Schornikov, 1998: 226 (Propontocypris (S.) m.); Schornikov & Chavtur, 2001: 91; 2002: 94; Schornikov & Zenina, 2004 b: 214. 21. * S. ? postconcava Schornikov, 1973 Schornikov, 1973: 57; 1997: 95 (Propontocypris (S. ?) p.); 1998: 226 (Propontocypris (S.) p.). 22. S. ? sp. 1 Schornikov & Chavtur, 2001: 91; 2002: 94; Schornikov & Zenina, 2004 b: 214.Published as part of Schornikov, Evgeny I., 2006, Checklist of the ostracod (Crustacea) fauna of Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan, pp. 29-59 in Zootaxa 1294 on page 34, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17351
Bairdoppilata hirsuta
No full textBairdoppilata hirsuta (Brady, 1880) (Figure 11) 1880 Bairdia hirsuta Brady, n. sp.: 51, pl. 4, figs. 4, 5. 1976 Bairdia hirsuta Brady. —Puri & Hulings, p. 265, pl. 4, figs. 4, 5. Not 1969 Bairdoppilata (Bairdoppilata?) hirsuta (Brady).—Maddocks, p. 79, fig. 43A–I, pl. 2, figs. 1, 2. Not 1973 Bairdoppilata hirsuta (Brady).—Maddocks, p. 42, figs. 5B–G, 6A–E [= B. hirsutella, n. sp., see below]. Not 2009 Bairdoppilata? hirsuta (Brady).—Maddocks et al., Checklist, p. 888. Material Examined: None. Taxonomic Remarks: The species is firmly identified only from the type locality. The lectotype selected by Puri & Hulings (1976) is a somewhat nondescript RV from Challenger Station 300, near Juan Fernandez Island in the Southeast Pacific (33 o 44’0”S, 78 o 10’0” W, depth 1375 fathoms). They reported the dimensions as: RVL 1.46 mm, RVH 0.90 mm (see Fig. 11). Supplemental bairdoppilatan dentition was not mentioned and is not visible in their illustration. The calcified inner lamella (infold) of the lectotype is somewhat narrow, and it may be an instar. The soft parts are unknown. Redescription of a larger, preferably living population from this locality will be needed to recognize this species, and all records of B. hirsuta at other localities require re-examination. Specimens from Eltanin station 25, in the East Pacific were identified as B. hirsuta by Maddocks (1973), but that identification is dubious. For clarity of communication, a new name, B. hirsutella Maddocks, n. sp., is proposed below for that Eltanin population. Maddocks (1969) described and illustrated two adult females as B. (B.?) hirsuta (specimen 468F, USNM 121353; specimen 469F, USNM 121355; both from the Gulf of Mexico, 28 o 15’N, 87 o 02’W, depth 1000 m). Their dimensions agree well with the population described from Eltanin station 25 (Fig. 12), but without males a firm identification is difficult. Maddocks (1969) also reported subfossil valves from numerous Albatross and Anton Bruun stations, but those identifications are even less plausible. Brandão (2008) demonstrated that the diversity of bairdioids has been severely underestimated in the Southern Ocean and in deeper water.Published as part of Maddocks, Rosalie F., 2022, Taxonomic applications of the esophageal flapper valve in Bairdoppilata and Glyptobairdia (Bairdiidae, Ostracoda), with comments on anatomy, ontogeny, and geography, pp. 301-342 in Zootaxa 5175 (3) on pages 321-322, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5175.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/700358
Bairdoppilata villosa
No full textBairdoppilata villosa (Brady, 1880) 1880 Bairdia villosa Brady, n. sp.: p. 50, pl. 3, figs. 3a–b; pl. 5, figs. 2a–g; pl. 8, figs. 4a–f. 1976 Bairdia villosa Brady. —Puri & Hulings, p. 266, pl. 2, figs. 1–4. Not (?) 1969 Bairdoppilata (Bairdoppilata?) villosa (Brady).—Maddocks, p. 75, figs. 40A–H, 41A–C. Material Examined: None. Anatomical Remarks: Brady’s drawing of the esophageal flapper valve of B. villosa was the first published illustration of this structure (Brady 1880, pl. 3, fig. 3; Maddocks 2015, fig. 1A). It shows the general relationships of the ring with collar and belt, two thick, symmetrical braces ending in oval aprons, and a fan-shaped plate with concentric light and dark bands, but it does not show whether the posterior margin of the plate is dentate. Taxonomic Remarks: The species is reliably identified only from the subfossil lectotype specimen at the type locality near Kerguelen Island. Brady’s description of soft anatomy should be verified from new material. All reports of this species from elsewhere should be re-examined. It is likely that they comprehend multiple species, as Brandão (2008) showed for B. simplex. For example, the two adult males (specimen 371M, USNM 121344; specimen 194M, USNM 121345) described by Maddocks (1969) were collected from Eltanin station 1418 (54 o 32’S, 159 o 02’E, 113– 92 m), which is thousands of kilometers east of the type locality at Kerguelen Island. They represent a species of Bairdoppilata, but the identification as B. villosa requires re-examination.Published as part of Maddocks, Rosalie F., 2022, Taxonomic applications of the esophageal flapper valve in Bairdoppilata and Glyptobairdia (Bairdiidae, Ostracoda), with comments on anatomy, ontogeny, and geography, pp. 301-342 in Zootaxa 5175 (3) on page 328, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5175.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/700358
Bairdoppilata simplex
No full textBairdoppilata simplex (Brady, 1880) 1880 Bairdia simplex Brady, n. sp.: 51, pl. 7, figs. 1a–d. 1976 Bairdia simplex Brady. —Puri & Hulings, p. 266, pl. 3, figs. 11–14. Not 1969 Bairdoppilata (Bairdoppilata?) simplex Brady. —Maddocks, p. 77, figs. 42A–H. 2008 ? Bairdoppilata simplex (Brady).—Brandão, p. 379, figs. 3.20a, b; 4, 5G–H; table 3. Material Examined: None. Taxonomic Remarks: The species is firmly identified only from subfossil type specimens at the type locality, and the soft parts are not known. Brandão (2008) demonstrated that, in the Southern Ocean alone, the materials subsequently reported under this name include at least 10 species, and identifications from other regions are even more suspect. For example, two specimens from the materials identified as B. (B.?) simplex by Maddocks (1969) were re-examined by Brandão (2008, p. 387, figs. 8B, E, H–I, L, P, Q): Female specimen 191F, USNM 121347, was collected at Eltanin station 418, 62 o 39–40’S, 56 o 8–10’W, 311– 426 m. Male specimen 205M, USNM 121348, was collected at Eltanin station 1345, 54 o 50–51’S, 129 o 46–48’W, 915–1153 m. Brandão stated that they represent either one or two different species, which she provisionally identified as ? Bairdoppilata sp. 1 aff. ? B. labiata (Müller). The appendages and hemipenis were described, but not the esophageal valve.Published as part of Maddocks, Rosalie F., 2022, Taxonomic applications of the esophageal flapper valve in Bairdoppilata and Glyptobairdia (Bairdiidae, Ostracoda), with comments on anatomy, ontogeny, and geography, pp. 301-342 in Zootaxa 5175 (3) on page 328, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5175.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/700358
Restricted Quadratic Forms, Inertia Theorems and the Schur Complement.
No full textThe starting point of this investigation is the properties of restricted quadratic forms, x^TAx, x {IS A MEMBER OF} S {IS A SUBSET OF} {m DIMERNSIONAL SPACE}, where A is an m x m real symmetric matrix, and S is a subspace. The index theory of Heatenes (1951) and Maddocks (1985) that treats the more general Hilbert space version of this problem is first specialized to the finite-dimensional context, and appropriate extensions, valid only in finite-dimensions, are made. The theory is then applied to obtain various inertia theorems for matricea and positivity tests for quadratic forms. Expressions for the inertial of divers symmetrically partitioned matrices are described. In particular, an inertia theorem for the generalized Schur complement is given. The investigation recovers, links and extends several, formerly disparate, results in the general area of inertia theorems
Diffusive author(s), cohesive author: Analysis of S/N (1994)
No full textThis study indicates the ways in which various aspects of the author(s) are brought forth in Dumb type’s performance art, the S/N production. Previous research has suggested a non-hierarchical organization of Dumb type and the absence of a “privileged author” in Dumb type’s collaborative work, S/N. However, the results that I have investigated from member’s interviews on the creative process of S/N along with my analysis of the recorded images of S/N, indicate a different aspect of the author(s). First, S/N was created through, so to speak, the collective ideas of the members of Dumb type. Further, S/N has at least nine quotations from previous performances, installations, and printed writings, besides the work-in-progress technique. Explicating one of the “author functions” as given by Michel Foucault, each text has plural subjects of the author. However, it has been revealed from members’ interviews that Teiji Furuhashi had a decision-making role in selecting the members’ ideas within the performance. Since then, S/N has had plural subjects of creation; however, Furuhashi is one of the subjects of creation along with the “privileged author.” S/N has plural authors (diffusive authors) yet at the same time, it has a “privileged author,” Teiji Furuhashi (cohesive author)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
