1,720,964 research outputs found
Uterine Fibroid Embolization (UFE) with optisphere: A prospective study of a new, spherical, resorbable embolic agent
No full textINTRODUCTION: Optisphere (Teleflex, Wayne, PA, USA, currently distributed by Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) is a new, resorbable, calibrated spherical embolic agent. We aimed to evaluate its clinical safety and effectiveness for fibroid embolization through a prospective case series.METHOD: This prospective case series studied patients treated with fibroid embolization using Optisphere between July 2017 and June 2018. The primary outcomes were device-related adverse event assessments and MRI-determined percentage infarct of the dominant fibroid (DF %) and infarct of all fibroids (AF %) at 3 months post-embolization. Secondary outcomes included symptom improvement with the validated Uterine Fibroid Symptom Score and Quality of Life questionnaire (UFS-SS and UFS-QOL) at 3 months and 12 months post-embolization. Statistical analysis was through the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for nonparametric paired data.RESULTS: Twenty-three consecutive patients were treated with Optisphere (median age 44.0, uterine volume 484.0 ml, dominant fibroid volume 167.0 ml). The complete dominant fibroid infarction (DF %) rate was 91.3% (21/23 patients), and the complete all fibroid infarction rate (AF %) was 82.6% (19/23). No adverse device-related safety events were encountered. Significant improvement was demonstrated in 3-month UFS-SS (56 vs 19, p < 0.0001), UFS-QOL (40 vs 88, p = 0.0008), uterine volume (484 ml vs 246 ml, p < 0.0001) and dominant fibroid volume (167 vs 64 ml, p < 0.0001). Symptomatic improvement continued to 12 months (UFS-SS 56 vs 11, p = 0.0008, UFS-QOL 40 vs 98.7, p = 0.0008).CONCLUSION: Optisphere is an effective embolic agent for fibroid embolization with good symptomatic response and percentage fibroid infarct.</p
The Impact on Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH), uterine fibroid size and uterine artery patency following Uterine Fibroid Embolization (UFE) with a resorbable embolic agent
No full textThe effect of Uterine Fibroid Embolization on fertility and ovarian reserve remains uncertain. We assessed the impact of a new resorbable, spherical particle (Gelbead) on concentration of Anti-Mullerian (AMH) hormone, fibroid volume and uterine artery patency. This prospective cohort study recruited consecutive patients from July 2017 to June 2018. Serum AMH, fibroid and uterine volume, UFS-QOL (uterine fibroid score-quality of life) scores were measured prior to and at 1 month and/or 3 months post embolization. Twenty-four participants were enrolled (median age 44 years, uterine volume 484 cm
3, initial dominant fibroid volume 167 cm
3). One patient was lost to follow-up. AMH (median ± SD) immediately prior to embolization was 3.2 ± 13.7 pmol/L. At 1-month postembolization, AMH was 4.1 ± 8.6 pmol/L and at 3 months 4.4 ± 8.6 pmol/L. We found no significant difference in AMH levels between baseline and at 1 month (p = 0.58) or baseline and 3 months (p = 0.17). The median dominant uterine fibroid volume decreased (167 to 64 cm
3, p < 0.001). At 3 months post-embolization, 17/23 patients had patent uterine arteries bilaterally (73.9%). UFE with Gel-bead did not significantly affect AMH at 3 months post embolization, whilst maintaining a high rate of uterine artery patency.
</p
Technical and imaging outcomes from the UK registry of prostate artery embolization (UK-ROPE) study: Focusing on predictors of clinical success
No full textINTRODUCTION: The UK Registry of Prostate Artery Embolization (UK-ROPE) was a prospective, multicentre study comparing PAE against surgical therapies for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A wealth of data was collected supplementary to the main study outcomes which provide a snapshot of UK PAE practice. We aimed to interpret these data in the hope of providing insight into factors which affect clinical outcome and radiation dose.METHODS: 216 patients (mean age 66, mean IPSS 21.3) undergoing PAE at 20 British centres from July 2014 to January 2016 were prospectively followed up to 12 months with retrospective analysis of the data. Technical outcome was evaluated based on procedural and fluoroscopy times, skin dose and dose area product (DAP). Clinical outcome was evaluated through collection of Qmax, IPSS reduction and prostate volume reduction. Multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to assess the significance of various patients and procedural factors on clinical outcome and patient dose.RESULTS: Significant predictors of technical outcome which affected patient skin dose included severity of CTA-detected atheroma (p < 0.001), the practitioner (p < 0.001) and use of protective coil embolization (p = 0.019). Predictors of clinical outcome included initial prostate size (dichotomized into groups > 80 ml and = <80 ml, d = 1, p = 0.0138), embolic agent (spherical particles < 300 nm performed best, p = 0.01) and number of arteries embolized (IPSS reduction of 32.9% in unilateral PAE versus 54.4% for bilateral PAE, p = 0.026).CONCLUSION: We have identified several important factors which are associated with improved clinical outcome and increased patient dose which we hope will facilitate optimal patient selection and encourage improved embolization technique.</p
Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) have a differential impact on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS): Retrospective Analysis of the Multicentre UK-ROPE (UK Register of Prostate Embolization) Study
No full textPURPOSE: To compare the relative IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) improvement in storage and voiding symptoms between prostatic artery embolization (PAE) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).METHOD: Retrospective analysis of the UK-ROPE (UK Register of Prostate Embolization) multicentre database was conducted with inclusion of all patients with full IPSS questionnaire score data. The voiding and storage subscore improvement was compared between interventions. Student's t-test (paired and unpaired) and ANOVA (Analysis of variance) were used to identify significant differences between the groups.RESULTS: 146 patients (121 PAE, 25 TURP) were included in the analysis. Storage symptoms were more frequently the most severe symptom ('storage' in 75 patients vs 'voiding' in 17 patients). Between groups, no significant difference was seen in raw storage subscore improvement (TURP 4.9 vs PAE 4.2; p = 0.34) or voiding subscore improvement (TURP 8.4 vs PAE 6.7; p = 0.1). ANOVA demonstrated a greater proportionate reduction (relative to total IPSS) towards voiding symptoms in the TURP group (27.3% TURP vs 9.9% PAE, p = 0.001).CONCLUSION: Although both TURP and PAE improve voiding symptoms more than storage, a significantly larger proportion of total symptom reduction is due to voiding in the TURP cohort, with PAE providing a more balanced improvement between voiding and storage.</p
Mid-term results of the prospective LUMI-PAE study: propensity-matched analysis of 1-year follow-up data
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
The effect of protective coil embolization of penile anastomoses during prostatic artery embolization on erectile function: a propensity-matched analysis
No full textPurpose: To explore whether coil embolization of penile collateral arteries to prevent nontarget embolization during prostatic artery embolization (PAE) negatively affects erectile function. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on a prospectively maintained multicenter PAE database on all patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (January 2014 to July 2016). International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) scores were collected at baseline and within 12 months after the procedure. A logistic regression and nearest neighbor propensity-matched analysis (matched for age, baseline IIEF-5 scores, and use of 5α-reductase inhibitors) and paired t test were used to evaluate for differential impact on IIEF-5 scores between the group of patients who underwent (unilateral) penile collateral coil embolization and a matched control group of patients who did not. Results: Of a total of 216 patients, 26 underwent coil protection of an accessory pudendal vessel/penile collateral. After exclusions, 22 propensity-matched pairs were identified. The mean IIEF-5 score at baseline for the coil-embolized group was 14.8 ± 8.3 (out of a possible score of 30) and that for the matched control group was 14.0 ± 7.8. At the 12-month follow-up after the procedure, the mean follow-up IIEF-5 score was 15.5 ± 8.0 for the coil-embolized group and 14.2 ± 8.2 for the matched control group. The change in IIEF-5 scores after PAE was not significantly different between the 2 groups (0.66 ± 3.8 vs 0.20 ± 2.0; P = .64; 95% CI, -1.53 to 2.44). Conclusions: When penile collateral arteries were identified, protective coil embolization of penile collateral/accessory pudendal vessels during PAE was unlikely to affect erectile function negatively.</p
- …
