1,720,955 research outputs found
A Canonical Author: The Case of Hesiod
This chapter presents a case study of the Lexicon’s treatment of a single author, Hesiod. Early Greek poetry in general, and that of Hesiod in particular, presents certain difficulties for the historical approach which do not arise for texts of later periods. The main body of the chapter is divided into three sections, treating different respects in which Liddell and Scott (LSJ), and the historical principle it adopts, may seem problematic for the modern reader of Hesiod. The first section considers the ways in which LSJ conflicts with current beliefs concerning the text and dating of Hesiod. The second outlines some respects in which the historical principle may be inadequate for dealing with early Greek hexameter in general, given more recent scholarship on the nature and semantics of formulaic verse. The third treats more idiosyncratic features of Hesiod’s poetry that are particularly noteworthy for the lexicographer. Throughout, the main focus is on the Theogony and the Works and Days
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Parmenides and Early Greek Allegory
The question of the allegorical status of Parmenides’ poem has been subject to much and
heated debate. In what follows, I hope to advance the discussion by contextualizing it
more fully alongside other early instances of the technique. Allegory is a broad term in
both ancient and modern literary criticism: I shall begin by considering how modern
scholars have used the term of Parmenides, and suggest that disagreements
surrounding its applicability to archaic or classical literature arise at least partly from
commentators using different senses of the term. I shall argue against the a priori
objection to identifying allegory in Parmenides that such a compositional technique was
unknown in the fifth century, before considering the features of allegory as defined in
the earliest ancient commentators on the topic, Plato, Xenophon and the Derveni
commentator, in order to reach a sense more appropriate for fifth century texts than the
modern term implies. Indeed, allegoria is a much later term than the authors in
question, first attested in Cicero, and first attested in Greek by Plutarch, yet the earlier
terms used by Plato and Xenophon – huponoiai for hidden meanings and ainigmata for
the allegories themselves – do, I shall argue, correspond to identifiable poetic techniques
in Parmenides. For convenience, I shall use ‘allegory’ as a label for this technique
identified by Plato and Xenophon and the Derveni commentator, which consists
primarily of language which disguises a specific hidden sense different from its overt
semantic meaning. In conclusion, I will suggest that Parmenides demonstrates a more
extended, self-conscious use of the technique than anything found previously. Moreover,
I shall argue for a new interpretation of a crucial line (B8.53) which supports an
allegorical reading of the poem. Parmenides’ use of the technique can be seen as a
consequence of his novel epistemological ideas. As a result, some light will be shed on
the origins, in a didactic context, of a literary technique which would come to be
associated with the didactic genre
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
