1,721,067 research outputs found

    Frege\u27s Logic

    No full text
    Presents a new reading of Frege\u27s two-dimensional notation, and of the development of his notion of a logical language. --author-supplied descriptio

    Diagrammatic Reasoning in Euclid\u27s Elements

    No full text
    A quite detailed account of how diagrammatic reasoning works in Euclid, the role of definitions, postulates, and common notions, the nature of generality involved, and the precise role that diagrams play in demonstrations. --author-supplied descriptio

    Inferentialism and Holistic Role Abstraction in the Telling of Tales

    No full text
    Critical discussion of the motivation for and key themes of Brandom\u27s \u27Tales of the Mighty Dead: Essays in the History of Intentionality\u27 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002). --author-supplied descriptio

    Reading Begriffsschrift

    No full text
    A short introduction to central themes of \u27Frege\u27s Logic\u27. This essay is to be reprinted in the volume \u27Essays from the Harvard Review of Philosophy\u27, ed. S. Phineas Upham (Open Court, 2006). --author-supplied descriptio

    Seeing How It Goes: Paper-and-Pencil Reasoning in Mathematical Practice

    No full text
    This essay began as a faculty research talk and compares three forms of paper-and-pencil reasoning in mathematics, both what they share and how they differ. I have discussed each of the three forms of reasoning in other essays but only here bring those discussions together so as to compare them. --author-supplied descriptio

    Reading Rorty: A Sketch of a Plan

    No full text
    This paper, initially written for a conference on Rorty\u27s work, was invited as part of the launching of this new journal. In it I discuss themes in Rorty and Plato\u27s Theaetetus concerning truth and knowledge, and argue in particular that just as there are three quite different levels of discourse in the Theaetetus so we need to recognize that there are three analogous levels of discourse in Rorty\u27s discussions of truth. --author-supplied descriptio

    Empathy, Sentimental Education, and Restorative Justice: Providing a Larger Participatory Role for Victims in the American Criminal Justice System

    No full text
    Research on crime victims and their experiences within the American criminal justice system suggests that victims can be unjustly harmed throughout the criminal justice process. I argue that this results from victims' lack of a participatory role in the criminal justice process. Restorative justice initiatives have emerged in response to this issue, but have failed to make significant improvements. In an effort to understand why these current restorative initiatives are insufficient, three approaches of restorative justice are considered in light of two different groups of victims-–victims of sexual and domestic violence, and bereaved victims. This consideration suggests that in order to respond to the unjust harm of victims, restorative values must be woven into the criminal justice process. I claim that in an effort to remain fair and just our criminal justice system has inadvertently treated victims as less than rational, and therefore less than human, by marginalizing them within the criminal justice process. A solution would begin with a conceptual shift regarding the value of sentiments in a legal context and the re-articulation of objectivity. Through sentimental education, empathy and restorative values can begin to be woven into the criminal justice system, allowing us to adequately address the needs of victims and their larger participatory role within the criminal justice process

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore