1,720,976 research outputs found

    Reagent Controlled Diastereoselective Aminations with a New Chiral Nosyloxycarbamate

    No full text
    The synthesis of a new chiral nosyloxycarbamate derived from Helmchen's auxiliary is described. Reactions performed with this aminating reagent successfully give the formation of diastereomeric allylic carbamates or diastereomeric aziridines starting from different kinds of olefins

    Direct amination of β-oxo esters

    No full text
    The reaction of NsONHCO(2)Et, in the presence of CaO, with beta -oxo esters gives the corresponding aminated products in yields up to 58%. A substrate carrying the Oppolzer sultam undergoes amination with 40% diastereoselectivity. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved

    Can functionalized N-acyloxy aziridines be easily deprotected?

    No full text
    Nitrogen deprotection of polyfunctionalized N-acyloxy aziridines was studied considering the compatibility of reaction conditions with the different functional groups on the aziridine ring. (c) 2005 Academie des sciences. Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved

    Functionalised Enones as Starting Materials for the Construction of Aziridine Scaffolds

    No full text
    alpha-Substituted beta-keto esters have been transformed by means of a straightforward procedure into aziridine-1,2-dicarboxylates, which have been efficiently converted into alkenyl aziridine-1,2-dicarboxylates through Wittig olefination reaction. The possibility of aziridine ring elaborations and the presence of an olefin function make these new molecules suitable scaffolds for further derivatisation into potential bioactive targets

    Diastereoselective aziridination of chiral alpha-carbonyl enoates

    No full text
    Nosyloxycarbamates very efficiently aziridinate optically active a-carbonyl enoates with high levels of diastereoselectivity under mild conditions and in a straightforward process

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore