1,721,068 research outputs found

    MODEL FOR MODULATION DOPED FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTOR

    No full text
    This work at University of Illinois is funded by the Office of Scientific Research and the work at the University of Minnesota is partially funded by the Army Research Office and Honeywell, Inc

    Electron density of the two-dimensional electron gas in modulation doped layers

    No full text
    The work at the University of Illinois is funded by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research and the Joint Services Electronics Program. The work at the University of Minnesota is partially funded by the Army Research Office and by Honeywell, Incorporated

    ENHANCEMENT OF ELECTRON VELOCITY IN MODULATION-DOPED (AL, GA)AS GAAS-FETS AT CRYOGENIC TEMPERATURES

    No full text
    The research at the University of Illinois was funded by the US Air Force Office of Scientific Research. The work at the University of Minnesota was funded by the US Army Research Office and Honeywell, Inc. The authors would like to express their thanks to Dr. E. Hall, Dr. H. Goronkin and T. Miers of Motorola for providing the FET masks and Dr. A. Y. Cho for fruitful discussions

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore