1,721,003 research outputs found
Mitry Jean. Esthétique et psychologie du cinéma
No full textMetz Christian. Mitry Jean. Esthétique et psychologie du cinéma. In: Communications, 5, 1965. Culture supérieure et culture de masse. pp. 142-145
Mitry Jean. Esthétique et psychologie du cinéma
No full textMetz Christian. Mitry Jean. Esthétique et psychologie du cinéma. In: Communications, 5, 1965. Culture supérieure et culture de masse. pp. 142-145
Abel Gance
No full textMitry Jean. Abel Gance. In: 1895, revue d'histoire du cinéma, numéro hors-série, 1988. Jean Mitry. p. 15
Pordenone 1986
No full textMitry Jean. Pordenone 1986 . In: 1895, revue d'histoire du cinéma, n°2, 1987. pp. 13-14
De l'origine des Ciné Clubs
No full textMitry Jean. De l'origine des Ciné Clubs. In: 1895, revue d'histoire du cinéma, n°3, 1987. pp. 7-14
Pordenone 1987. Une déception : la Vitagraph. Une re-découverte : Fatty
No full textMitry Jean. Pordenone 1987. Une déception : la Vitagraph. Une re-découverte : Fatty. In: 1895, revue d'histoire du cinéma, n°4, 1988. pp. 2-6
Entretiens avec Jean Epstein et Douglas Fairbanks
No full textMitry Jean, Epstein Jean, Fairbanks Douglas. Entretiens avec Jean Epstein et Douglas Fairbanks. In: 1895, revue d'histoire du cinéma, numéro hors-série, 1988. Jean Mitry. pp. 25-29
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
