1,720,964 research outputs found
Eosinophilic esophagitis improved by the discontinuation of sublingual immunotherapy for aeroallergens: a case report
Full text linkIntroduction: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammation of the esophagus, characterized by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction, resulting from severe eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal mucosa. It is common in atopic subjects and food antigens have been identified as the most common triggers. However, a seasonal variation in EoE prevalence, correlated with air pollen levels, is reported, suggesting that also aeroallergens may play a role. Little is known about the interplay between EoE and concomitant atopy treatment for aeroallergens. Case presentation: We describe the case of an 11-year-old boy who presented dysphagia, vomiting, drooling, and chest pain while eating meat, developed 15 months after receiving sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for Alternaria (SUBLIVAC®). He underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealing severe eosinophilic predominant inflammation (100 eos/HPF), consistent with the diagnosis of EoE, not improving at the EGDs performed after both omeprazole and topical corticosteroids treatment, despite symptom improvement. Afterward, immunotherapy was switched from sublingual to injective form. At the EGD performed 1 month later, macroscopic examination of the esophageal mucosa was normal and eosinophilic infiltration was significantly decreased (5-10 eos/HPF). Conclusions: SLIT may induce EoE by chronic antigenic exposure of oral mucosa in patients with a robust allergic susceptibility: while attenuating the IgE-mediated immune reactions, the progressive contact with the causative allergen might induce a chronic stimulation of the immune system with the consequent activation of tissue eosinophils. Our data suggest monitoring patients receiving SLIT for EoE symptoms and to discontinue SLIT on their earlier appearance, possibly as a first-line treatment
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
A unique case of bilateral ovarian splenosis and review of the literature
No full textSplenosis is an acquired anomaly related to heterotopic auto-transplantation of splenic tissue following abdominal trauma or splenectomy. We report the first definitive bilateral ovarian case in a 65-year-old woman who underwent splenectomy following a motor vehicle accident 44 years prior to presentation. We review the literature and discuss the main differential diagnoses. Gross examination revealed a 1-cm well-circumscribed dark nodule on the surface of each ovary. Paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed blocks were sectioned and stained with hematoxylin-eosin and immunostains (CK5/6, Calretinin, WT1, Vimentin). The histological presence of both red and white splenic pulp, delimitation from ovarian tissue and ovarian origin of blood supply, as well as medical history, led us to the correct diagnosis. The outer nodular surface was covered by mesothelium (WT1+, CK5/6+, Calretinin+, Vimentin+), which was in continuity with the ovarian surface epithelium. To our knowledge, only six previous cases of ovarian splenosis are reported. Our patient is the oldest, with a very long interval from splenectomy to presentation. Clinically, splenosis may mimic malignancy, and a correct diagnosis avoids unnecessary overtreatment. The differential diagnosis includes an accessory spleen, spleno-gonadal fusion, and splenic hamartoma: they should be excluded to come to the correct diagnosis
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
A multistep cytological approach for patients with jaundice and biliary strictures of indeterminate origin
No full textAIMS. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) increases the sensitivity for detecting pancreatobiliary tract cancer over routine cytology. In this study, diagnostic accuracy and costs of cytology and FISH in detecting cancer in patients with jaundice with biliary strictures were assessed. METHODS. Brushing specimens from 109 patients with jaundice were obtained during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and examined by cytology and FISH. The specimens were considered FISH-positive for malignancy if at least five polysomic cells or 10 cells with homozygous or heterozygous 9p21/p16 deletion were detected. Definitive diagnosis of the stricture as benign or malignant relied on surgical pathology (45 cases) or clinical-radiological follow-up >18 months (64 cases). We calculated costs of cytology and FISH based on the reimbursement from the Piedmont region, Italy (respectively, €33 and €750). RESULTS. Ninety of 109 patients had evidence of malignancy (44 pancreatic carcinomas, 36 cholangiocarcinomas, 5 gallbladder carcinomas, 5 other cancers), while 19 had benign strictures. Routine cytology showed 42% sensitivity, but 100% specificity for the diagnosis of malignancy, while FISH-polysomy showed 70% sensitivity with 100% specificity and FISH-polysomy plus homozygous or heterozygous 9p21/p16 deletion showed 76% sensitivity with 100% specificity. The cost per additional correct diagnosis of cancer obtained by FISH, in comparison with cytology, was €1775 using a sequential cytological approach (ie, performing FISH only in patients with negative or indeterminate cytology). CONCLUSIONS. FISH should be recommended as the second step in detecting cancer in patients with jaundice with pancreatobiliary tract strictures and cytology negative or indeterminate for malignancy
Prognostic impact of a 3-MicroRNA signature in cytological samples of small cell lung cancer
No full textBACKGROUND:
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive neoplasm that accounts for approximately 10% to 15% of lung cancers. In most cases, the diagnosis relies on cytology and needs to be confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Although several genetic and molecular abnormalities have been recorded, molecular markers able to predict the prognosis are still lacking. MicroRNA (miRNA) signatures have been recently proposed as useful biomarkers in lung cancer because of their high stability during standard sample processing.
METHODS:
Cytological samples for 50 patients with SCLC were collected from primary tumors (n = 25) and metastases (n = 25) by means of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or bronchial washing (BW); they were fixed in ethanol (FNA) or Duboscq-Brazil fluid (BW). The 3-miRNA panel expression (miR-192, miR-200c, and miR-205) was quantified with a TaqMan polymerase chain reaction miRNA assay and was compared with overall survival (OS) and clinicopathological data.
RESULTS:
All samples had sufficient RNA for the miRNA expression analysis to be performed, regardless of the sample source or the fixative medium. Patients with a low expression level of the 3-miRNA panel were associated with better OS in univariate (P = .032) and multivariate analyses (P = .022). Moreover, in the group of patients older than the mean age of our cohort (65.8 years), a significant OS advantage (P = .013) was seen for patients with a low expression level of the 3-miRNA panel.
CONCLUSIONS:
A specific 3-miRNA signature is potentially useful for predicting survival for patients with SCLC, and it may be feasible with cytological samples taken during standard diagnostic procedures
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
