111,628 research outputs found
39. Ámbito 5. De la revalorización del suelo urbano hacia el desarrollo de modelos de gestión para el Corredor Metropolitano de Quito: estrategia aplicada en El Ejido
Comunicación de Gabriela Mejia Gomez; Rogelio Dávalos Calderón; Andrés Alfonso Ramos Cevallos; Daniel Roberto Falconi Heredia; Grace Yépez para ISUF-H
39. Ámbito 5. De la revalorización del suelo urbano hacia el desarrollo de modelos de gestión para el Corredor Metropolitano de Quito: estrategia aplicada en El Ejido
Comunicación de Gabriela Mejia Gomez; Rogelio Dávalos Calderón; Andrés Alfonso Ramos Cevallos; Daniel Roberto Falconi Heredia; Grace Yépez para ISUF-H
Dental caries trends in Australian school children
Address for correspondence: Gloria C Mejia and Diep H Ha, Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, School of Dentistry, The University of AdelaideAustralian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, The University of Adelaid
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Strength Reduction Factor for Flexural RC Members Strengthened with Near-Surface-Mounted Bars
Current American Concrete Institute (ACI) guidelines for the design of flexural RC members strengthened with externally bonded fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) systems assign an additional partial strength reduction factor to the contribution of FRP, marking a deviation from ACI’s approach in building codes. This conservative method finds its rationale in the novelty and the higher variability of FRP, because of its nature as a material (compared to steel) and the conditions of its installation (externally bonded). Using the case of near-surface-mounted (NSM) FRP bars, this paper demonstrates that a single strength reduction factor can be formulated, while maintaining the same reliability and safety required in conventional RC members. Using a comprehensive test matrix of flexural members processed with a computerized Monte Carlo simulation technique, the probabilistic implications of strengthening RC beams and slabs with NSM FRP bars are investigated. The generated statistical data are employed to recommend revised strength reduction factors for flexural RC members strengthened with NSM FRP bars that eliminate the partial factor, and yet, provide a safety level equal to ordinary steel RC members
Numerical Approach to the Live Load Factor for RC Structures as a Function of Life-Time
The live load factor, as a function of the expected life-time, is computed for cast-in-place reinforced concrete elements (i.e., beam, slab and column) for a combination of dead and live loads. The accuracy of the reliability analysis is enhanced by taking advantage of the Rackwitz-Fiessler method which in turn is corroborated by Monte Carlo simulation applied to the calculation of the target reliability indices of each structural element type. As an example, the formulation of live load factor is reversed to demonstrate how the life-time or the probability of failure are affected as the actual design deviates from the requirements of the current building code
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Towards a dynamic rule-based business process
IJWGS is now included in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), starting from volume 4, 2008. The first impact factor, which will be for 2010, is expected to be published in mid 201
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
The construction of Karen Karnak: The multi-author-function
This thesis is situated within the comparatively recent developments of Web 2.0 and the emergence of interactive WikiMedia, and explores the mode of authorship within a Read/Write culture compared to that of a Read/Only tradition. The hypothesis of this study is that the role of the audience has become merged with the author, and as such, represents new functions and attributes, distinct from a more conventional concept of authorship, in which the roles of audience and author are more separate. Read/Write and participatory culture, as defined by this study, is focused on collaboration, and includes the influences of D.I.Y. culture, Open-Source practices and the production of text by multiple authors. Multi-authorship presents a re-thinking of several concepts which support the notion of the individual author, since the focus of multi-authorship is not on attribution and ownership of a finished text, but on the continued malleability of a text. Modes of multi-authorship, demonstrated in the use of the pseudonyms Alan Smithee and Karen Eliot, represent declarative authors whose names signify multiple origins, whilst concurrently indicating a distinct body of work. The function of these names form an important context to this study, since primary research involves the construction of an experimental mode of multi-authorship utilising WikiMedia technology and the interaction of thirty nine participants, who are invited to create a body of work under the collective pseudonym Karen Karnak. The data generated by this experiment is analysed using aspects of Michel Foucault's author-function to identify and determine power structures inherent in the WikiMedia context. The interplay of power structures, including concepts such as identity, ownership and the body of work, affect the resulting mode of authorship and contribute to the construction of Karen Karnak, suggesting further areas of research into the emerging multi-author
- …
