1,720,954 research outputs found
Indoor Smoking Detection Method based on Dual Spectral Fusion Image and YOLO Framework
Indoor fires are a major problem for public safety, with smoking being the most hidden threat. Traditional fire detection systems, such as smoke detectors, are only useful in the early stages and face challenges due to low light and limited visibility. This article describes an indoor smoking detection system that combines visible and infrared image fusion with the YOLO (You Only Look Once) detection framework. This technique improves indoor smoking detection performance by combining infrared thermal data with deep learning concepts. The YOLOv9 system detects indoor smoking behavior using a deep neural network for feature presentation and inference. The approach is optimized at the data, feature extraction, and model training levels to improve scene adaptability. The experimental results showed that on the custom indoor smoking dual spectral fusion image dataset, the average accuracy mAP (@ 0.5) of the Modified YOLOv9c detection model reached 95.8%, which was much better than the baseline models YOLOv5s (81.4%), YOLOv7 (89.7%), YOLOv8 (90.8%), and YOLOv9c (89.9%) mAP, respectively with significant performance improvements. Strategies like dual spectrum fusion, data augmentation, attention mechanism, and loss function were implemented to improve model detection performance. This paper presents a practical solution for indoor smoking detection tasks, demonstrating the approach's superiority in detection performance and providing a viable toolset for public safety against indoor fire hazards
Enhanced Efficiency and Productivity through AAMS
The Traditional attendance management systems, which rely on human operations or RFID-based solutions, frequently struggle with scalability, accuracy, and efficiency. This thesis proposes an Automated Attendance Management System (AAMS) that employs a customized YOLOv9-C model for real-time facial recognition via deep learning. The model's performance is significantly improved by adding Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) blocks and the Complete Intersection over Union (CIoU) loss function. On a custom dataset, the baseline YOLOv9-C model had 86.2% precision and 84.9% recall, with a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 89.9% at IoU threshold of 0.5. However, the revised YOLOv9-C(M) model demonstrated significant gains, including a mAP of 93.8%, as well as improved precision (94.1%) and recall (96.6%).
These improvements can be due to the introduction of SE blocks, which promote feature recalibration, and the CIoU loss function, which maximizes bounding box localization and increases detection accuracy even in tough conditions such as occlusion or dimly lit areas. The improved YOLOv9-C model consistently outperforms the existing YOLO models (YOLOv5, YOLOv7, and YOLOv8s), according to a comparison study. The mAP for YOLOv5 was 80.2%, YOLOv7 was 89.1%, and YOLOv8s was 91.4%. In contrast, the upgraded YOLOv9-C model outperformed the others, with greater robustness, precision, and recall.
The system employs a one kind of custom dataset to evaluate the model's performance in some scenarios and settings, as well as to ensure trustworthy workforce detection in diverse contexts. By automating the attendance process, this technology reduces errors, saves administrative time, and promotes institutional efficiency
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
