1,720,971 research outputs found
Pharyngo-oesophageal perforation following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: management and results
No full textOBJECTIVES: Pharyngo-oesophageal perforation is a rare, life-threatening complication of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery; its management remains poorly defined. We reviewed our experience to understand the treatment of this dreadful complication.METHODS: Data regarding the demographics, clinical course, diagnosis, management and outcomes of 15 cases of pharyngo-oesophageal perforations in 14 patients were collected during the period from 2003 to 2016.RESULTS: Pharyngo-oesophageal perforation occurred at a median of 32 days (range 1âday-102 months) after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery. Clinical manifestations included neck abscesses and cutaneous fistulas (10 cases), cervical swelling (two cases), salivary leakage from cervicotomy (two cases), dysphagia, halitosis and regurgitation (one case). In all cases, conservative management was utilized. Two patients affected by minor external fistulas were successfully managed conservatively. In 13 cases, the following surgery was performed: (i) radical bone debridement, total or partial removal of spine fixation devices, autologous bone graft insertion or plate/cage replacement in one case each; (ii) anatomical suture of the fistula; or (iii) suture line reinforcement with myoplasty (in 11/13 cases). Perforation recurred in three cases. One patient underwent reoperation. The other two patients were treated conservatively At a median follow-up of 82 months (range 1-157 months), all patients exhibited permanent resolution of the perforation.CONCLUSIONS: Patients with minimal leaks in the absence of systemic infection can be managed conservatively. For cases of large fistulas with systemic infection, we recommend partial or total removal of the fixation devices, direct suture of the oesophageal defect and coverage with tissue flaps
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Total Lymphadenectomy and Nodes-Based Prognostic Factors in Surgical Intervention for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
No full textAbstract
BACKGROUND:
To evaluate prognostic factors based on the number of resected lymph nodes, we considered 202 patients who underwent radical resection and "total lymphadenectomy" for esophageal adenocarcinoma according to a prospective protocol.
METHODS:
Fifty-eight tumors surrounded by Barrett's epithelium underwent esophagectomy and esophagogastrostomy, and 144 tumors without Barrett's epithelium underwent esophageal resection at the azygos vein level, total gastrectomy, and Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy. All nodes and fat tissue were resected at the following stations: chest 4L and R3, R4, R7, R8, and R9 (TNM seventh edition) and abdomen 1-12 according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (1998). The nodes were counted, excluding fragments. The correlations between the number of nodes yielded and the ratio of the metastatic lymph nodes/lymph nodes yielded with pT stage, grading measurements, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were calculated.
RESULTS:
A total of 6,270 nodes were yielded (interquartile range per patient, 22-38; minimum, 4 nodes; maximum, 61 nodes). In 3 of 21 (14%) stage pT1 cases, less than 10 nodes were counted, in 2 of 27 (8%) stage pT2 cases, less than 20 were counted, and in 73 of 154 (47%) stage pT3-4 cases, less than 30 nodes were counted. The lymph node yield (LNY) and T stage were not correlated (r = 0 .048; p = 0.5). The metastatic lymph nodes to lymph nodes yielded ratio was correlated with pT stage (r = 0.272; p = 0.0001), and G (r = 0.385; p = 0.0001). CSS positively correlated with pT stage (p = 0.02), G (p = 0.001), and metastatic lymph nodes/lymph nodes yielded ratio (p = 0.01) (multivariate analysis).
CONCLUSIONS:
The total number of lymph nodes to be removed in total and within each T stage indicated as thresholds could not be reached in up to 38.6% of patients. The metastatic lymph nodes/lymph nodes yield ratio not the total LNY, did correlate with cancer-specific survival
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
