1,721,101 research outputs found

    Whithin plate continental magmatism and its mantle sources.

    No full text
    An informal meeting on within-plate continental magmatism was held at Padova University on April 2012. This meeting was organized to honor the memory of our friend and colleague Prof. Enzo Michele Piccirillo (1943–2012) (Fig. 1). The contribution of Prof. Piccirillo towards our understanding of the petrogenesis of tholeiitic and alkaline within-plate continental magmatism and of its mantle source rocks was crucial for both the international and Italian scientific communities. In particular, the international research team lead by Prof. Piccirillo on the Paraná and CAMP continental flood basalts in South America was among the first to unravel the origin of these major large igneous provinces (LIPs) of the Phanerozoic (and of their Proterozoic and Archean counterparts) and representmilestones in our knowledge of the geology and petrology of the SouthAmerican platform. Prof. Piccirillo worked also on alkaline magmatism (e.g., from Kenya, Ethiopia, Cameroon, Brazil, Paraguay) and investigated the mineral chemistry of clinopyroxene in rocks of various tectonic settings. The results are reported in some 140 peer reviewed papers. Those who knew him as a teacher and as a colleaguewill always remember his enthusiasm, imagination, the ability to work and the rigorous approach with which he faced every new research topic and, in general, Enzo's extraordinary human qualities. Therefore we would like to thank this special issue as a tribute to Prof. Piccirillo and a way of thanking himfor all he taught us

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore