1,721,068 research outputs found
The combination of erector spinae plane block and pectoralis blocks could avoid general anesthesia for radical mastectomy in high risk patients
EUS for the staging of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
BACKGROUND:
The role of EUS in the locoregional staging of gastric carcinoma is undefined.
OBJECTIVE:
We aimed to comprehensively review and quantitatively summarize the available evidence on the staging performance of EUS.
DESIGN:
We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane, CANCERLIT, and EMBASE databases for relevant studies published until July 2010.
SETTING:
Formal meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy parameters was performed by using a bivariate random-effects model.
PATIENTS:
Fifty-four studies enrolling 5601 patients with gastric cancer undergoing disease staging with EUS were eligible for the meta-analysis.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:
EUS staging accuracy across eligible studies was measured by computing overall sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR).
RESULTS:
EUS can differentiate T1-2 from T3-4 gastric cancer with high accuracy, with overall sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.81-0.90), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.89-0.93), 9.8 (95% CI, 7.5-12.8), 0.15 (95% CI, 0.11-0.21), and 65 (95% CI, 41-105), respectively. In contrast, the diagnostic performance of EUS for lymph node status is less reliable, with overall sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.63-0.74), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.81-0.88), 4.4 (95% CI, 3.6-5.4), 0.37 (95% CI, 0.32-0.44), and 12 (95% CI, 9-16), respectively. Results regarding single T categories (including T1 substages) and Bayesian nomograms to calculate posttest probabilities for any target condition prevalence are also provided.
LIMITATIONS:
Statistical heterogeneity was generally high; unfortunately, subgroup analysis did not identify a consistent source of the heterogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS:
Our results support the use of EUS for the locoregional staging of gastric cancer, which can affect the therapeutic management of these patients. However, clinicians must be aware of the performance limits of this staging tool
Adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer.
In spite of progress made in surgical techniques and intensive care, only a slight improvement in the therapeutic control of gastric carcinoma has been achieved in the last 20 years. In this paper we present a review of controlled clinical trials on adjuvant chemotherapy and chemo-immunotherapy for gastric cancer and this topic is discussed in the light of our experience and that of the Gastrointestinal Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. The results of adjuvant therapy are less satisfactory in Western countries than in Japan. The efficacy of the 5-fluorouracil + adriamycin + mitomycin C regimen in advanced gastric cancer has not been confirmed in an adjuvant setting. The therapeutic benefit reported in Japanese studies may be due to a chemotherapy started intraoperatively or during the immediate postoperative period and should also be considered in the light of a standardized surgical treatment. The new therapeutic trends, using recent chemotherape..
Recent advances in conventional and molecular prognostic factors for gastric carcinoma
Despite radical surgery, the prognosis of patients who have gastric carcinoma remains unsatisfactory because of the intrinsic but unpredictable aggressiveness of this malignancy. During the past decade an ever-growing list of molecular prognostic factors has been proposed based on the discovery of the mechanisms underlying gastric cancer aggressiveness. Studies performed in larger and more homogeneous series of patients and adequate statistical analysis are warranted before any of the candidate biomarkers can be implemented in the routine clinical setting for the identification of patients at higher risk and thus for the selection of candidates for adjuvant or more aggressive therapie
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
