1,720,970 research outputs found

    Thromboembolic disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing joint arthroplasty: Update on prophylaxes

    No full text
    The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the higher incidence of RA patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery is well recognized. The objective of the present study is to describe the incidence of VTE and discuss the correct prophylaxis in RA patients undergoing knee or hip replacement. A systematic review of studies on thromboprophylaxis in RA patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery was performed. Detailed information was extracted to calculate the rate of VTE in RA orthopedic patients and analyze the thromboprophylaxis performed and bleeding complications. Eight articles were eligible for full review. No difference in the overall rate of VTE was observed between RA patients and controls. No significant differences were found in RA patients in terms of bleeding complications. The data on the optimal prophylaxis to be used in RA patients were insufficient to recommend any of the several options available. In the absence of dedicated guidelines for the care of RA patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, management must be individualized to obtain favorable patient outcome, weighing up all the factors that might put the patient at risk for higher bleeding and thrombotic events. © 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc

    Pulmonary Thrombosis: A Clinical Pathological Entity Distinct from Pulmonary Embolism?

    No full text
    Since Virchow's autopsy studies in the mid-1800s, it has generally been believed that pulmonary embolism (PE) originated from the embolization of fibrin fragments from a deep venous thrombosis (DVT). However, a DVT is often not found in patients with PE (up to 50% of cases). Could fibrin form in the pulmonary vessels without coming from the periphery? In this review, the authors will try to support the hypothesis that a pulmonary thrombosis (PT) may develop. They will do so through different clinical models related to some pathological conditions such as pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and asthma, all of which show a close relationship between local inflammation and activation of blood coagulation, two defensive systems that may lead to fibrin deposition in the lungs, thus recognizing the possibility that PT may be a newly recognized entity. An increased risk for PE has been demonstrated in these conditions. Sickle cell disease and assisted reproductive technologies are other very different conditions in which an increased risk for PE has been found. Gaucher's disease is a rare hereditary condition in which the hemostatic system could have a role in the pathogenesis of pulmonary hypertension, which complicates the course of the disease. In particular, the increased risk for PT, common to all these conditions, deserves attention when a patient presents with sudden dyspnea, an unexpected COPD exacerbation, or severe sudden asthmatic dyspnea. As a consequence, prediction scores for venous thromboembolism could be revised

    Empathy and the Educational Approach to Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Direct Oral Anticoagulants

    No full text
    Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown to be at least effective and safer than anti-vitamin K (VKA) for the prophylaxis of cardioembolism during AF. These drugs do not need laboratory monitoring such as the VKA anticoagulants, but they are at risk of poor adherence and persistence as all drugs taken by mouth. Against this drawback, empathy may have an important role because it is important as a tool to be used for effective interpersonal communication. Patients like to be heard and understand that those who listen to them are immersed in their world. Empathy is part, and is a founding principle, of Narrative Medicine which today is a real discipline with many advantages because it is intrinsically therapeutic for the patient (in telling and being heard). Empathy prevents the disconnection that can intervene between the doctor and the patients. Have we ever wondered if we are sufficiently empathetic? Is it possible to measure our empathy? Yes, across Jefferson's scale. A high score on Jefferson's scale could certainly further improve the quality of the management of anticoagulated patients

    Living on Oral Anticoagulants: Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale Results

    Full text link
    Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used in patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. The lack of the need for laboratory monitoring and a better safety than vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) has probably changed the quality of life of patients on these oral anticoagulants. This was a real-life prospective observational cohort study. The aim was to evaluate if a long-term treatment with DOACs could offer a better quality of life than VKAs. Moreover, age, gender, education level, time in therapeutic range for VKAs, taking medication once or twice a day for DOACs, the total daily number of medications and thrombotic and bleeding complications were considered as variables probably associated with the quality of life of these patients. Methods: Between January and December 2021, the Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale (DASS) 25-items was administered as an interview to patients on either VKAs or DOACs therapy. During the follow-up period, all of the patients were closely monitored to evaluate possible bleeding and thrombotic events. Results: The analysis included 300 outpatients treated with VKAs and 254 treated with DOACs. In general, the quality of life was better in patients taking DOACs (DASS total score: DOACs = 44.7, 42.9-46.5 vs. VKAs = 51, 49.2-52.8, p < 0.0001) as the daily-life limitations, hassles and burdens and the psychological impact were less important than in patients on VKAs therapy. Conclusions: VKAs negatively influence the daily-life of the patients in terms of both less satisfaction and time-consuming tasks. DOACs confer a better quality of life even if some concerns emerge from not knowing how their therapy is working

    Do we need more guidance on thrombophilia testing? Challenges and special considerations

    No full text
    Introduction: Thrombophilia testing (TT) is a laboratory procedure designed to detect the risk factors involved in the pathogenesis of vascular occlusions. The role of TT is also controversial because it has a limited impact on the choice and duration of antithrombotic treatments.Areas covered: We reviewed, by examining MEDLINE up to October 2023. Accepted and not accepted thrombophilia markers are discussed along with the appropriateness or not of prescribing TT in several conditions such as: provoked and unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE), women who are planning a pregnancy whose relatives had VTE or have a hereditary thrombophilia, before assumption of estroprogestins, after multiple pregnant loss, arterial thrombosis, retinal vein occlusion, and splanchnic vein thrombosis.Expert opinion: TT is not essential in the management of VTE, but it may be useful for limiting adverse events in case of thrombophilia. We expose our criticism of items afforded by other guidelines by presenting our opinion based on both the scientific evidence and clinical practice. We also deal with common mistakes in prescribing and interpretations of TT hoping to purpose an educational approach on this topic. Finally, we emphasize the creation of the expert in hemostasis and thrombosis who should be present in every hospital

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore