1,720,977 research outputs found
Macroevolutionary patterns in cranial and lower jaw shape of ceratopsian dinosaurs (Dinosauria, Ornithischia): phylogeny, morphological integration and evolutionary rates.
Is Torosaurus Triceratops? Geometric morphometrics evidences of late Maastrichtian ceratopsid dinosaurs
"Background: Recent assessments of morphological changes in the frill during ontogeny hypothesized that the late Maastrichtian horned dinosaur Torosaurus represents the “old adult” of Triceratops, although acceptance of this finding has been disputed on several lines of evidence.. Methodology\/Principal Findings: Examining the cranial morphology of 28 skulls in lateral view and 36 squamosals of Nedoceratops hatcheri, Triceratops spp. and Torosaurus spp. by means of landmark-based geometric. morphometrics, we compared ontogenetic trajectories among these taxa. Principal Component Analysis and cluster. analysis confirmed different cranial morphologies. Torosaurus shape space is well separated from Triceratops, whereas Triceratops horridus and Triceratops prorsus partially overlap within Triceratops shape space. Linear. regressions between shape and size suggest different ontogenetic trajectories among these taxa. Results support the “traditional” taxonomic status of Torosaurus. We hypothesize that ontogeny drives cranial morphology with different patterns between Torosaurus and Triceratops.. Conclusions\/Significance: Torosaurus is a distinct and valid taxon. Whether looking at entire skulls, skulls without the frill, frills alone, or squamosals, Torosaurus has different morphologies and distinct allometric trajectories. compared to Triceratops. This new approach confirms the taxonomic status of Torosaurus as well as the. comparatively low diversity of ceratopsids at the end of the Maastrichtian in North America.
The role of post-natal ontogeny in the evolution of phenotypic diversity in Podarcis lizards
""Understanding the role of the developmental pathways in shaping phenotypic diversity allows appreciating in full the processes influencing and constraining morphological change. Podarcis lizards demonstrate extraordinary morphological variability that likely originated in short evolutionary time. Using geometric morphometrics and a broad suite of statistical tests, we explored the role of developmental mechanisms such as growth rate change, ontogenetic divergence ⁄ convergence ⁄ parallelism as well as morphological expression of heterochronic processes in mediating the formation of their phenotypic diversity during the post-natal ontogeny. We identified hypermorphosis – the prolongation of growth along the same trajectory – as the process responsible for both intersexual and interspecific morphological differentiation. Albeit the common allometric pattern observed in both sexes of any species constrains and canalizes their cephalic scales variation in a fixed portion of the phenotypic space, the extended growth experienced by males and some species allows them to achieve peramorphic morphologies. Conversely, the intrasexual phenotypic diversity is accounted for by nonallometric processes that drive the extensive morphological dispersion throughout their ontogenetic trajectories. This study suggests a model of how simple heterochronic perturbations can produce phenotypic variation, and thus potential for further evolutionary change, even within a strictly constrained developmental pathway."
Functional and phylogenetic constraints in Rhinocerotinae craniodental morphology
Hypotheses: After the effect of phylogeny is statistically removed, cranial structures that are employed solely for mastication should covary the most with hypsodonty (high-crowned cheek teeth are termed 'hypsodont'). Such structures should also be the least phylogenetically constrained. A corollary: Structures that are highly influenced by shared ancestry will exhibit greater morphological integration than those that are affected less. Organisms: All extant rhinoceroses and a number of extinct, European, Plio-Pleistocene species. Analytical methods: Using two-dimensional geometric morphometrics, we studied skull shape in the dorsal and lateral views, mandible shape in the lateral view, and the upper tooth row shape in the occlusal view. To reflect feeding habits, we used a surrogate variable, the hypsodonty index. Using phylogenetically independent contrasts and variation partitioning, we separated shape variation into function, phylogeny, and size components. We tested morphological integration with Escoufier's RV coefficient. Results: The mandible and the upper tooth row have the highest covariance with hypsodonty and the least with phylogeny. Skull morphology shows the reverse; it has the smallest covariance with hypsodonty and the highest with phylogeny. The degree of morphological integration between the upper tooth row and the other structures is relatively low, indicating that the former component is the least phylogenetically constrained. In keeping with our predictions, the cranial region associated with chewing is constrained by function and not as much by phylogeny, whereas others show stronger phylogenetic constraint. © 2010 Paolo Piras
The evolution of squamosal shape in ceratopsid dinosaurs (Dinosauria, Ornithischia)
""Ceratopsidae represents one of the last and best-known radiations of non-avian dinosaurs. Interspecific variation is well documented qualitatively with linear measurements, but little has been done to quantify shape differences in the frill that may indicate functional or evolutionary signals. In order to investigate shape change in the squamosal across Chasmosaurinae and Centrosaurinae, we applied geometric morphometrics to the outline of the squamosal for 155 specimens representing. 27 ceratopsid species and Protoceratops spp. A Mantel test suggests that the shape of ceratopsid squamosals is highly constrained by phylogeny. MANOVA, ANOVA, and their phylogenetic versions suggest that an evolutionarily significant allometric signal exists between the two clades, but not within clades. Principal component analysis indicates that centrosaurines have a uniform squamosal shape, with the exceptions of Spinops and Diabloceratops. Even when accounting for phylogeny,. the relationship between squamosal shape and size is significant. Mapping shape onto the phylogeny, we estimated ancestral shapes at nodes. The transition from the non-ceratopsid to ceratopsid condition is characterized by a squamosal with a wider angle between the infratemporal process and the caudoventral margin, and a more dorsoventrally elongated and caudally expanded blade. From root to tips, centrosaurine squamosals were found to be conservative, but exhibit a slight dorsoventral. expansion and a narrow angle between the infratemporal process and the caudoventral margin in more derived taxa. Chasmosaurines, compared with centrosaurines, show a derived morphology, with a trend towards a blade that is strongly expanded dorsoventrally and with a narrower angle between the infratemporal process and the caudoventral margin."
The evolution of squamosal shape in ceratopsid dinosaurs (Dinosauria, Ornithischia)
Ceratopsidae represents one of the last and best-known radiations of non-avian dinosaurs. Interspecific variation is well documented qualitatively with linear measurements, but little has been done to quantify shape differences in the frill that may indicate functional or evolutionary signals. In order to investigate shape change in the squamosal across Chasmosaurinae and Centrosaurinae, we applied geometric morphometrics to the outline of the squamosal for 155 specimens representing 27 ceratopsid species and Protoceratops spp. A Mantel test suggests that the shape of ceratopsid squamosals is highly constrained by phylogeny. MANOVA, ANOVA, and their phylogenetic versions suggest that an evolutionarily significant allometric signal exists between the two clades, but not within clades. Principal component analysis indicates that centrosaurines have a uniform squamosal shape, with the exceptions of Spinops and Diabloceratops. Even when accounting for phylogeny, the relationship between squamosal shape and size is significant. Mapping shape onto the phylogeny, we estimated ancestral shapes at nodes. The transition from the non-ceratopsid to ceratopsid condition is characterized by a squamosal with a wider angle between the infratemporal process and the caudoventral margin, and a more dorsoventrally elongated and caudally expanded blade. From root to tips, centrosaurine squamosals were found to be conservative, but exhibit a slight dorsoventral expansion and a narrow angle between the infratemporal process and the caudoventral margin in more derived taxa. Chasmosaurines, compared with centrosaurines, show a derived morphology, with a trend towards a blade that is strongly expanded dorsoventrally and with a narrower angle between the infratemporal process and the caudoventral margin
Variations in the cranial morphology in European and North American rhinocerotidae from Eocene to Miocene: preliminary report
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
