1,721,078 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
"Nephritic flares" are predictors of bad long-term renal outcome in lupus nephritis.
We retrospectively analyzed the courses of 70 patients with lupus nephritis followed for 5 to 30 years (median 127 months). Patients survival was 100% at 10 years and 86% at 20 years. The probability of not reaching the end point (persistent doubling of plasma creatinine) was 85% at 10 years and 72% at 20 years. A multivariate analysis of variables at presentation showed that male sex (P = 0.005) and hematocrit lower than 36% (P = 0.01) were associated with the end point (relative risk 7.5 and 14). We then analyzed for the role of renal flare-ups, defined either as a rapid increase in plasma creatinine or by an increase in proteinuria. Patients with renal flares of any type had more probabilities of reaching the end point than patients who never had flares (P = 0.03; relative risk 6.8). The hazard of the end point was 27 times higher in patients with flares along with rapid increased in plasma creatinine than in patients without flares or with flares with proteinuria alone (P < 0.00001). This hazard was higher when plasma creatinine did not return to the basal levels within two months after treatment (P < 0.00001)
Treatment of membranous lupus nephritis.
In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the effects of treatment in 19 patients with membranous lupus nephritis (MLN) and nephrotic syndrome. Eight patients were treated with corticosteroids alone, and the other 11 patients received methylprednisolone and chlorambucil alternated every other month for 6 months. At presentation, sex, age, duration of renal disease before renal biopsy, plasma creatinine, and arterial hypertension were similar in the two study groups. Of the eight patients treated with corticosteroids alone, three showed complete remission and one partial remission of the nephrotic syndrome. During the follow-up (mean, 114+/-63 months), seven of these eight patients developed one or more renal flare-ups. Of the 11 patients treated with methylprednisolone and chlorambucil, seven had complete remission, and the other four had partial remission of the nephrotic syndrome. During the follow-up (mean, 83+/-59 months), only one patient had renal flare-up. At the end of the follow-up, all patients were alive, but three patients in the group treated with corticosteroids alone had developed a doubling of plasma creatinine, and another patient had persistent nephrotic syndrome. Two other patients were in complete remission, one patient was in partial remission, and the last patient had nonnephrotic proteinuria. In the group of patients treated with methylprednisolone and chlorambucil, one patient developed extracapillary glomerulonephritis and eventually entered end-stage renal failure 24 years after the clinical onset of renal disease. Seven patients were in complete remission, and three patients were in partial remission at the last follow-up visit. This retrospective study suggests that methylprednisolone and chlorambucil may induce a more stable remission of nephrotic syndrome and may better protect renal function in the long term in comparison with corticosteroids alone. However, these results must be confirmed by a prospective controlled trial
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
