1,760,568 research outputs found
GUTIERREZ, M.I.
Letter from Mr. M.I. Gutiérrez to Gen. Alvaro Obregón relating to the mines "La Ladera" and "La Candelaria" and offering him a share in the mining company that he will form. Negative response signed by Fernando Torreblanca on behalf of Gen. Alvaro Obregón. / Carta del Sr. M.I. Gutiérrez al Gral. Alvaro Obregón relativa a las minas "La Ladera" y "La Candelaria" y ofreciéndole acciones en la compañía minera que se formará. Respuesta negativa firmada por Fernando Torreblanca a nombre del Gral. Alvaro Obregón
GUTIERREZ, M.I.
Letter from Mr. M.I. Gutiérrez to Gen. Alvaro Obregón relating to the mines "La Ladera" and "La Candelaria" and offering him a share in the mining company that he will form. Negative response signed by Fernando Torreblanca on behalf of Gen. Alvaro Obregón. / Carta del Sr. M.I. Gutiérrez al Gral. Alvaro Obregón relativa a las minas "La Ladera" y "La Candelaria" y ofreciéndole acciones en la compañía minera que se formará. Respuesta negativa firmada por Fernando Torreblanca a nombre del Gral. Alvaro Obregón
Erratum to "The perception of emotion and social cues in faces" [Neuropsychologia 45 (2007) 1] (DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.001)
[Correction Notice: An erratum for this article was reported in Vol 45(10) of Neuropsychologia (see record 2007-06958-027). The publisher regrets that in the above referenced Guest Editorial, published in special issue 45/1: The perception of emotion and social cues in faces, one of the author names was represented incorrectly. The correct representation is M.I. Gobbini.
M.I. Kirillova, Iskovaia davnost
M.I. Kirillova, Iskovaia davnost. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé. Vol. 19 N°3, Juillet-septembre 1967. pp. 731-732
M.I. Kirillova, Iskovaia davnost
M.I. Kirillova, Iskovaia davnost. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé. Vol. 19 N°3, Juillet-septembre 1967. pp. 731-732
On necrocapitalism: A plague journal
M.I. Asma is the collective designation for six authors from Canada and the United States, representing a variety of revolutionary anticapitalist theoretical persuasions: J. Moufawad-Paul, Devin Zane Shaw, Mateo Andante, Johannah May Black, Alyson Escalante, and D. W. Fairlane. As the pandemic transitioned from science fiction to reality in early 2020, a number of writers and thinkers in the imperialist metropoles declared the impossibility of writing in the face of a future that is foreclosed. And yet, due to the nightmare that capitalism has been since its beginning, numerous writers and thinkers from the margins have always written in the face of such foreclosure. Meanwhile, other contemporary thinkers sought to conceptualize the unfolding pandemic according to conceptions of bio/necropolitics, forgetting the foundation upon which these conceptions have always existed.
The M.I. Asma writing group came together to stake out a different terrain, thinking through the pandemic as events unfolded while also always working to think beyond the capitalist imaginary. Writing between April 2020 and May 2021, the authors set out to produce a serial theoretical philosophical project focused on class struggle in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. The authors approached the pandemic as an occasion to think capitalism according to what it always has been, what the pandemic reveals about its current ideological deployment, and how we can think about a communist alternative in the face of exterminism.
This book collects, with some revisions and with a new epilogue, the entries from the On Necrocapitalism blog, where M.I. Asma’s interventions first appeared.DC Author's celebration 202
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
