241,785 research outputs found
Yu. M. Lotman and Contemporary Narratology
No full textThe paper reconstructs the influence of the semiotic studies of Yu. Lotman on the formation of the problems and the research apparatus of modern (“post-classical”) multimedia narratology, associated with the names of J. Genette, P. Ricoeur, W. Schmid and others. In particular, the author discusses the emergence of scientific interest in the film narrative, which has also had a significant impact on literary narratology, enriching it with the constructive concept of the “narrative image”. The article focuses on Lotman’s storytelling research, especially the concept of “plot-driven texts” of culture in their opposition to “plotless texts”. Particular importance is attached to the distinction between plot and myth, which continued O. M. Freidenberg’s investigations into the origin of narration. Lotman’s pioneering role in mastering the scientific categories of “narrative worldview” and “narrative event” is described. The author reveals the place of Lotman's research heritage in the comprehension of narrative practices as a tool for mental appropriation of life, accumulation and retranslation of event experience, as well as in the birth and development of the modern project of historical narratology
On the Pre-Anniversary Biographies of M. Yu. Lermontov
No full textСтатья поступила в редакцию 03.10.2014 г.В статье дан обзор жизнеописаний М. Ю. Лермонтова, изданных накануне юбилея поэта. В центре внимания — своеобразие интерпретаций ключевых событий творческого и жизненного пути классика. Охарактеризована манера письма и индивидуальный стиль биографов. Обозначена проблема отсутствия научной биографии М. Ю. Лермонтова.The article reviews a number of M. Yu. Lermontov’s biographies published on the eve of the poet’s upcoming birthday anniversary. The author focuses on the interpretations of the key events of the classic’s artistic journey and life. The author characterizes the biographers’ individual manner and style emphasizing the absence of a scholarly biography of M. Yu. Lermontov
Yu. M. Lotman Forever Turned the Idea of the Text
No full textAn interview with O. A. Kling is presented, revealing the significance of Yu. M. Lotman’s works for literary criticism of the XX–XXI centuries. Oleg Alekseevich Kling is a Russian literary critic, Doctor of Philology, Professor, Head of the Department of Literary Theory of the Faculty of Philology of Lomonosov Moscow State University, winner of the magazine award “Questions of Literature”. The areas of scientific interests are Russian literature, the history of Russian literary studies, symbolism and post-symbolism, the Silver Age. He is the author of many works in these fields, including books: “Alexander Blok: The Structure of the Novel in Verse”, “Russian Poetry: The poem ‘Twelve’” (2004), “The Poetic World of Marina Tsvetaeva” (2004), “The Influence of Symbolism on Post-Symbolist Poetry in Russia of the 1910s: Problems of Poetics” (2010), “‘The Platinum Age’ in Russian Literature” (2017), editor-in-chief of the encyclopedia “Russian Literary Critics of the twentieth Century: BioBibliographic Dictionary. Vol. I: A–L” (2017)
Yu. M. Lotman and the Problems of Theoretical Literary Criticism
No full textIn the article, the author tries to assess the contribution of Yu. M. Lotman to the development of basic concepts of literary theory, which, along with the study of the problems of culture studies and the history of Russian literature, played an extremely important role in philological science. Among the large number of monographs and articles written by the scholar from Tartu, “Lectures on Structural Poetics” (1964) and “Culture and Explosion” (1992) stand out. According to the author of this article, it was in these works that the main break through took place, which put up an end to the rule of dogmatic literary criticism and opened up new opportunities in the field of philology. In particular, in the first book, the concept of structure as an epistemological category was postulated for the first time, in contrast to composition, which represents the material embodiment of the structure in text. In the last study, Lotman largely develops a number of new ideas, in which the text is understood as a field of relationships between systemic and non-systemic elements and suggests the possibility of various options for its development. In “Culture and Explosion”, the scholar presented a set of ideas that largely coincide with the thoughts of European poststructuralists, but differ in the interpretation of the main features of the literary process
Hui tu zhen ben jing shi mu yu jin gang zuan
No full text著作者余好辯, 伍憤時.Cover title.上下卷.On double leaves, East Asian binding.木魚歌文.zhu zuo zhe Yu Haobian, Wu Fenshi.Shang xia juan.Mu yu ge wen
Yu. M. Kobiščanov, Aksum
No full textCaquot André. Yu. M. Kobiščanov, Aksum. In: Annales d'Ethiopie. Volume 7, année 1967. pp. 159-160
Yu. N. Chumakov: Memories of Meeting Yu. M. Lotman
No full textThe article features an excerpt from Chumakov’s memoirs, describing how, in the late 1960s, he got acquainted with Lotman’s book Lectures on Structural Poetics and then met the author of the lectures at the Pushkin Conference in Pskov. According to the memoirist, Lotman’s Lectures on Structural Poetics gave literary studies in the 1970s a new language, which may then have been modified within some other schools of literary studies, but it laid the foundation for the scientific description of the fiction text. Investigation of the fiction text has been characterized since the late 1960s by the structuralist approach. The memoirs also mention Chumakov’s defending his candidate dissertation, in which Lotman acted as an opponent (the dissertation was entitled “Problems of Pushkin’s Poetics: (Lyrics, The Stone Guest, Eugene Onegin)” and was defended in Saratov, in 1970.
One part of Chumakov’s candidate dissertation, as well as his report at the Pushkin conference in Pskov, was devoted to the role of the notes and “Passages from Onegin’s Journey” in Pushkin’s novel “Eugene Onegin”. Independently of each other, Chumakov and Lotman came to the conclusion that the notes are not a supplement, but real independent parts within the novel in verse, along with its eight chapters
Yu. M. Lotman and the Problems of Theoretical Literary Criticism
No full textВ статье рассматривается вклад Ю. М. Лотмана в развитие основных положений теории литературы, которые сыграли исключительно важную роль в филологической науке.In the article, the author tries to assess the contribution of Yu. M. Lotman to the development of basic concepts of literary theory, which, along with the study of the problems of culture studies and the history of Russian literature, played an extremely important role in philological science
Yu. M. Lotman and the Problems of Theoretical Literary Criticism
No full textВ статье рассматривается вклад Ю. М. Лотмана в развитие основных положений теории литературы, которые сыграли исключительно важную роль в филологической науке.In the article, the author tries to assess the contribution of Yu. M. Lotman to the development of basic concepts of literary theory, which, along with the study of the problems of culture studies and the history of Russian literature, played an extremely important role in philological science
“He Was the Only Professor for Us...”: Yu. M. Lotman – Teacher and Scholar
No full textThe article presents an interview of I. Z. Belobrovtseva, characterizing the personality of Yu. M. Lotman as well as the significance of his works for structural semiotics in literary criticism of the 20th century. Irina Zakharovna Belobrovtseva is an Estonian specialist in literary studies, Doctor of Philology, Professor of Russian Literature at the Institute for the Humanities of Tallinn University, Laureate of the Estonian State Prize in Science. Her research interests are Russian literature and culture of the 20th – 21st centuries, Estonian literature and culture, Russian literature of Estonia. She is author of the following books: “Over the Blank Page Alone and with Hope: Articles on Contemporary Estonian Literature” (1987), “Reading Poetry Together: A Guide for Teachers” (1994), “Mikhail Bulgakov’s Novel “Master and Margarita”: Constructive Principles of Text Organization” (1997), “Mikhail Bulgakov’s Novel “The Master and Margarita”. Commentary.” (co-authored with S. Kulyus, 2004, 2006, 2007), “The Image of a "Small Enemy": the Baltic States and Poland in the Mirror of Soviet Caricature (1918–1940)” (co-authored with D. Vseviov, A. Danilevsky, 2014), “Leonid Zurov. In the Shadow of Bunin” (2020) and others
- …
