592 research outputs found
J. M. Lopez Pinero, F. Bajosa, M. L. Terrada, Clasicos espanoles de la Anatomia Patologica anteriores a Cajal
No full textJ. M. Lopez Pinero, F. Bajosa, M. L. Terrada, Clasicos espanoles de la Anatomia Patologica anteriores a Cajal. In: Revue d'histoire des sciences, tome 35, n°1, 1982. pp. 88-89
J. M. Lopez Pinero, F. Bajosa, M. L. Terrada, Clasicos espanoles de la Anatomia Patologica anteriores a Cajal
No full textJ. M. Lopez Pinero, F. Bajosa, M. L. Terrada, Clasicos espanoles de la Anatomia Patologica anteriores a Cajal. In: Revue d'histoire des sciences, tome 35, n°1, 1982. pp. 88-89
J. M. Lopez PINERO, M. Seoane. La introduccion en Espaňa del sistema sanitario liberal (1791-1870), Madrid
No full textJ. M. Lopez PINERO, M. Seoane. La introduccion en Espaňa del sistema sanitario liberal (1791-1870), Madrid. In: Revue d'histoire des sciences, tome 39, n°1, 1986. pp. 93-94
J. M. Lopez PINERO, M. Seoane. La introduccion en Espaňa del sistema sanitario liberal (1791-1870), Madrid
No full textJ. M. Lopez PINERO, M. Seoane. La introduccion en Espaňa del sistema sanitario liberal (1791-1870), Madrid. In: Revue d'histoire des sciences, tome 39, n°1, 1986. pp. 93-94
The integrated and adaptable dynamics of the Caring Life Course Theory and its constructs
No full textThe integrated and adaptable dynamics of the Caring Life Course Theory and its constructsThe Caring Life Course Theory (CLCT) is an emerging interdisciplinary approach to understanding caring and self-care throughout a person's life course.[1] It proposes 14 theoretical constructs that work together in an integrated and adaptable way based on a person's context, health status, and circumstances (shown in Figure 1).[2-8] In this theory, ‘Fundamental Care’ is an essential construct, which refers to the care required by all people for health, development, well-being, welfare, and survival (illustrated in detail in Figure 2).[1, 9, 10] The CLCT examines care needs and provision over time, emphasising the combination of ‘self-care’ and ‘care networks’ as the support needed to meet a person's holistic care requirements in a coordinated way. Such networks involve formal and informal carers via natural or technological means, all crucial in addressing the evolving aspects of ‘Fundamental Care’ and the interplay of its elements across time (Figure 2).[1-8, 10]References[1] Kitson A, Feo R, Lawless M, Arciuli J, Clark R, Golley R, Lange B, Ratcliffe J and Robinson S 2022 Towards a unifying caring life‐course theory for better self‐care and caring solutions: A discussion paper Journal of Advanced Nursing 78 e6-e20[2] Barbabella F, Melchiorre M G, Quattrini S, Papa R, Lamura G, Richardson E and van Ginneken E 2017 How can eHealth improve care for people with multimorbidity in Europe?: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe Copenhagen)[3] Pinero De Plaza MA, Beleigoli A, Mudd A, Tieu M, McMillan P, Lawless M, Feo R, Archibald M, Kitson A. Not Well Enough to Attend Appointments: Telehealth Versus Health Marginalisation. InHealthier Lives, Digitally Enabled 2021 (pp. 72-79). IOS Press. doi:10.3233/SHTI210013[4] Pinero de Plaza M A, Beleigoli A, Brown S, Bulto L N, Gebremichael L G, Nesbitt K, Tieu M, Pearson V, Noonan S, McMillan P, Clark R A, Hines S, Kitson A, Champion S, Dafny H and Hendriks J M 2022 Effectiveness of telehealth versus standard care on health care utilization, health-related quality of life, and well-being in homebound populations: a systematic review protocol JBI Evid Synth 20 2734-42[5] Pinero De Plaza MA, Conroy T, Mudd A, Kitson A. Using a Complex Network Methodology to Track, Evaluate, and Transform Fundamental Care. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 Dec 15;284:31-35. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210656. PMID: 34920462.[6] WHO 2018 Continuity and coordination of care: a practice brief to support implementation of the WHO Framework on integrated people-centred health services[7] Pinero de Plaza M A 2023 The network of interactions between the elements of the fundamentals of care framework across the life course. figshare.[8] Pinero de Plaza M A, Yadav L and Kitson A 2023 Co-designing, measuring, and optimizing innovations and solutions within complex adaptive health systems Frontiers in Health Services 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2023.1154614[9] Feo R, Conroy T, Jangland E, Muntlin Athlin Å, Brovall M, Parr J, Blomberg K and Kitson A 2018 Towards a standardised definition for fundamental care: A modified Delphi study Journal of clinical nursing 27 2285-99[10] Lawless M T, Tieu M, Golley R. and Kitson A. 2023 How and where does “care” fit within seminal life‐course approaches? A narrative review and critical analysis Journal of Advanced Nursing A.</p
Le Tribunal constitutionnel espagnol
No full textRodriguez-Pinero y Bravo Ferrer M., Leguina Villa J. Le Tribunal constitutionnel espagnol. In: Annuaire international de justice constitutionnelle, 6-1990, 1992. La hiérarchie des normes constitutionnelles et sa fonction dans la protection des droits fondamentaux – Le principe de non-rétroactivité des lois. pp. 99-132
Supplemental Material - From Promise to Practice: How Health Researchers Understand and Promote Transdisciplinary Collaboration
No full textSupplemental Material for From Promise to Practice: How Health Researchers Understand and Promote Transdisciplinary Collaboration by Michael T. Lawless, Matthew Tieu, Mandy M. Archibald, Maria Alejandra Pinero De Plaza, and Alison L. Kitson in Qualitative Health Research</p
Metaphor and symbol: The portrait of Montezuma II in the work of W.H. Prescott and its translation into Spanish by J. Navarro
No full textMuch has been said about how ideological tendencies can influence the content of a translation and the Spanish version of Prescott’s work History of the Conquest of Mexico, with a Preliminary View of the Ancient Mexican Civilization, and the Life of the Conqueror, Hernando Cortés is a clear example of this influence. Manipulation was the strategy that the Mexican editorial promoted and it is what the translator yielded to, but not in a way that was expected. Focusing on the account of the episode of the conquest of Mexico in which Montezuma and his tragic death are prominent, this article will show how Navarro, the translator, meticulously respects the North American’s portrayal of the Aztec ruler, whom he considers to be hypocritical, superstitious, lavish, weak and fainthearted. When Navarro does manipulate the description, it is principally in order to accentuate some negative trait of the Aztec leader which has already been presented in the original text or to prevent the Mexican reader from having to see in print the name of the emperor who was associated with incidents which many Mexicans might consider lamentable. At the same time, it will be clear that cognitive linguistics provides adequate theoretical support in order to be able to comprehend that both the original and translated texts highlight the idea of Montezuma as a metaphor and symbol of failure.La version espagnole du travail de Prescott History of the Conquest of Mexico, with a Preliminary View of the Ancient Mexican Civilization, and the Life of the Conqueror, Hernando Cortés (Vol. I), publiée au Mexique, révèle de façon évidente la façon dont l’idéologie peut influencer le contenu d’une traduction. La manipulation idéologique est la stratégie que défend la maison d’édition mexicaine et le traducteur s’y plie, mais pas dans le sens que l’on croit. En prenant comme base le récit de la conquête du Mexique, dont le protagoniste fut Moctezuma et sa mort tragique, ce travail montre comment le traducteur, Navarro, manipule le texte dans l’intention d’accentuer certains traits négatifs présents dans le texte original, tout en respectant le portrait du monarque aztèque décrit par l’auteur américain comme hypocrite, superstitieux, faible et pusillanime. Un autre objectif de Navarro est d’éviter au public mexicain l’association du nom de l’empereur à des évènements qui pourraient être considérés comme déplorables. D’autre part, ce travail fait apparaître que la linguistique cognitive offre le cadre théorique idéal pour comprendre que le texte original et la traduction s’accordent à présenter Moctezuma comme la métaphore et le symbole de l’échec.2642420,1820,082Q3Q4AHCISSC
Traducción y censura en la España franquista
No full textEn partant de l’hypothèse selon laquelle le traducteur, fort de son bagage cognitif, interprète le texte qu’il traduit et que la traduction est un phénomène de réécriture, cet article analyse la version espagnole de l’œuvre de la romancière française Sidonie Gabrielle Colette, Claudine à Paris, traduite par Piñas en 1963. L’objectif de cette analyse est de démontrer comment une circonstance historique concrète, la censure imposée par la dictature franquiste, influe sur la traduction.Assuming that the translator, cleverer from his stock of cognitive knowledge, interprets the text he translates, and that translation is a phenomenon of rewriting, this article examines the Spanish version of «Claudine à Paris» by the French novelist Sidonie Gabrielle Colette, translated by Piñas in 1963. The analysis aims at demonstrating how concrete historical circumstances –the censorship imposed by Franco’s dictatorship– influences the work.Partiendo de la premisa de que el traductor interpreta el texto que traduce aportando a esta interpretación su bagaje cognitivo y de que, por tanto, la traducción es un fenómeno de reescritura, este trabajo analiza la versión española de la novela Claudine à Paris, de la escritora francesa Sidonie Gabrielle Colette, traducida por Piñas en 1963, con el fin de demostrar cómo una circunstancia histórica concreta, la censura impuesta por la dictadura franquista, incide sobre el trabajo de traducción
PROLIFERATE: An adaptable framework with tools to evaluate different processes, outputs, and products via participatory research
No full text
This framework presents a constructivist evaluation procedure for assessing the personal construction of meaning (e.g., end-user experiences, understandings, beliefs, and perceptions)1-3. It considers the non-linear characteristics of complex and adaptive issues/products/problems4 from an end-user perspective. It is operationalized to evaluate and monitor real-world situations, research outcomes, and products. It assesses their fitness via person-centered parameters, which can be adaptable for evaluating different subjective experiences concerning any evaluated matter and associated behaviors.
It can be utilized to evaluate "usability" and its impact (i.e., the consequence of the usability or a prediction of such effect) on products and processes. Usability can refer to a broad set of criteria (e.g., satisfaction, learnability, efficiency, memorability, robustness, effectiveness, and accessibility)2,3,5. These constructs fluctuate depending on each end-user context and their adaptive dynamics2,6-10. The versatile and variable nature of end-user perceptions/experiences can be captured, qualified, and quantified as 'feedback' by this approach: PROLIFERATE: An adaptable framework with tools to evaluate different processes, outputs, and products via participatory research. It is an emergent dialectical multimethod evaluation 11-15.
The PROLIFERATE metaparadigm method (epistemological basis and procedure in Figure 1)11-14 accommodates a way to qualify and/or quantify each end-user's subjective experience using a dialectical pluralism approach16, which can be adaptable to the evaluation of AI (i.e., usability and impact) because, in PROLIFERATE, the evaluated matter is assessed considering these domains of end-users behaviors or constructs:17
1. Comprehension or understanding
2. Resonance or emotional responses
3. Uptake barriers
4. Motivation to use it and associated behavior change
5. Optimization suggestions
PROLIFERATE design11-14 implies that, for instance, the usability of AI can be evaluated by adapting and analyzing the combination of its five constructs to obtain estimations of AI usability (constructs 1,2,3) and impact (constructs 4, 5). These constructs can be analyzed using different procedures, including Bayesian statistics and prediction modeling11-14.
In this method, Knowledge Translation (KT) is understood as per the Knowledge Translation Complexity Network Model (KT-CNM)4. It refers to simultaneous networks interacting in non-linear ways in which different agents/people, entities, or nodes (i.e., researchers, community, clinicians, etc.), are linked, connected, or interact based on their social features, conditions, institutional structures, roles, and behaviors, represented in knowledge translation processes or stages: problem identification, evaluation, implementation, knowledge creation, etc.)4,8,18. This complex lens does not assume cause and effect but a continuum of interactions between people and knowledge.
PROLIFERATE takes a complex system approach as an evaluation framework as it can be combined with quantitative tools while emphasizing collaboration with end-users (i.e., participatory research)11-14. This emergent evaluation framework is evolving within several KT projects:
· It has been ethically approved to assess interdisciplinary learnings, e.g., (1) within a university allied health practice (Health2Go) and (2) pilot tested within the co-design of KT video resources.11,12
· It has been examined in knowledge actualization discussions concerning a science implementation project.13
· It is currently being adapted to evaluate research training modules, lab-training strategies, and AI.14,15
References:
1. Louder E, Wyborn C, Cvitanovic C, Bednarek AT. A synthesis of the frameworks available to guide evaluations of research impact at the interface of environmental science, policy and practice. Environmental Science & Policy 2021; 116: 258-65.
2. Dawood KA, Sharif KY, Ghani AA, Zulzalil H, Zaidan A, Zaidan B. Towards a unified criteria model for usability evaluation in the context of open source software based on a fuzzy Delphi method. Information and Software Technology 2021; 130: 106453.
3. Schwartz JM, Moy AJ, Rossetti SC, Elhadad N, Cato KD. Clinician involvement in research on machine learning–based predictive clinical decision support for the hospital setting: A scoping review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2021; 28(3): 653-63.
4. Kitson A, Brook A, Harvey G, et al. Using complexity and network concepts to inform healthcare knowledge translation. International Journal of Health Policy and Management 2018; 7(3): 231.
5. Hartson HR, Andre TS, Williges RC. Criteria For Evaluating Usability Evaluation Methods. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 2001; 13(4): 373-410.
6. May CK. Complex adaptive governance systems: a framework to understand institutions, organizations, and people in socio-ecological systems. Socio-Ecological Practice Research 2022.
7. Pinero De Plaza M. A transdisciplinary research program addressing complex health research problems. JBI Evidence Implementation's Bulletin 2022; 2(Issue 1).
8. Pinero De Plaza MA, Conroy T, Mudd A, Kitson A. Using a Complex Network Methodology to Track, Evaluate, and Transform Fundamental Care. IOS Press, Nurses and Midwives in the Digital Age. IOS Press: IOS Press; 2021: 31-5.
9. Conroy T, Pinero de Plaza MA, Mudd A, Mitchell M, Kitson A. Measuring fundamental care using complexity science: A descriptive case study of a methodological innovation. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2021.
10. Sousa V, Lopez KD. Towards Usable E-Health. Applied Clinical Informatics 2017; 08(02): 470-90.
11. Pinero de Plaza MA, Archibald M, Lawless M, et al. PROLIFERATE: An Adaptable Framework to Evaluate Participatory Research Products. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-146129/v1: Research Square Platform LLC; 2021.
12. Archibald M, Ambagtsheer R, Lawless MT, et al. Co-Designing Evidence-Based Videos in Health Care: A Case Exemplar of Developing Creative Knowledge Translation “Evidence-Experience” Resources. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2021; 20: 160940692110196.
13. Pinero de Plaza M, Murray J, Hunter S, Kourbelis C. March KT Conversations [abstract]- Applying the PROLIFERATE Framework to the REDUCE Missed Oral Healthcare: It Takes a Team Project.22nd of March 2021, 2021. https://researchnow.flinders.edu.au/en/activities/march-kt-conversations-applying-the-proliferate-framework-to-the- (accessed 29.03.22).
14. Pinero de Plaza MA, Lambrakis K, Morton E, et al. PROLIFERATE: A Tool to Measure Impact and Usability of AI-Powered Technologies. Digital Health Institute Summit; 2022, Feb 21; https://researchnow.flinders.edu.au/en/publications/proliferate-a-tool-to-measure-impact-and-usability-of-ai-powered-: The Australasian Institute of Digital Health Summit; 2022, Feb 21.
15. Pinero-de-Plaza MA, Lambrakis K, Barrera-Causil CJ, et al. PROLIFERATE_AI: A novel approach to evaluate the implementation of Artificial Intelligence Clinical Decision Support. Applied Clinical Informatics; 2022.
16. Johnson RB. Dialectical pluralism: A metaparadigm whose time has come. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2017; 11(2): 156-73.
17. Scotland ES. Evaluation methods and tools – resources- Body Map. http://www.evaluationsupportscotland.org.uk/media/uploads/resources/pdf_method_-_body_map.pdf (accessed 06/07/2019 2019).
18. Rycroft-Malone J. From Linear to Complicated to Complex Comment on "Using Complexity and Network Concepts to Inform Healthcare Knowledge Translation". International Journal of Health Policy and Management 2018; 7(6): 566-8.</p
- …
