1,721,154 research outputs found

    From dynamic exploration to “theory” and “theorems” (from 6th to 8th grades).

    No full text
    In their paper, L. Parenti, M. T. Barberis, M. Pastorino and P. Viglienzone report a long term teaching experiment showing the feasibility of an early approach (in grades VII-VIII) to geometry theorems and proving in the geometric domain. In particular, students move progressively from the observation of regularities in the relationships between three-dimensional objects and their two-dimensional representations (for instance, the transformation of straight segments into straight segments or points), to the formulation of some axioms, the production of conjectures and the construction of related proofs concerning the geometry of central projection and the geometry of parallel projection

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore