1,720,962 research outputs found
Recensione di E. Mazzarella, Perché i Poeti. La parola necessaria, Neri Pozza, Vicenza 2020
No full textIl recupero heideggeriano della metafisica critica kantiana
No full textReferring to Kant’s presence in Heidegger’s late ‘20s courses, this essay aims to investigate: 1. the productive and hidden consequences of these interpretations; 2. how Heidegger assumes the fundamental-question of Kant’s transcendental phi- losophy as a stand-point to the turn; 3. how the question of metaphysics – which Heidegger has always thought about and around which the Kehre moves – hinges on Kant. The Heideggerian reappraisal of Kantian critical-transcendental metaphysics leads to the question of foundation which reverts towards Aristotelian thought, and the recovery or abandonment of the former jointly proceeds with the recovery or the abandonment of the latter. The question about metaphysics signi- fies a trail sign towards Kant, following which one can try to read Heidegger in a non-dogmatic way
Posizione e modalità. La determinazione dell'essere nella svolta trascendentale
No full textScopo di questo saggio è quello di esporre la differenza che Kant pone tra essere (come nesso logico) ed esistenza (come dinamica datità effettiva). Prendendo le mosse dalla definizione kantiana di esistenza come posizione assoluta, esposta per la prima volta nel Beweisgrund del 1763, si passerà a trattare la problematizzazione dell’esistenza nell’ambito della svolta trascendentale come modalità. Infine si tratterà del conseguente ripensamento dei due modi della posizione.The aim of this essay is to expose the difference Kant poses between being (as a logic nexus) and existence (as dynamic-effective givenness). Starting from Kantian definition of existence as absolute position, appearing for the first time in the 1763 work, we’ll move on to deal with the problematization of existence within the transcendental turn as modality, then with the consequent reconsideration of the two modes of position
Sistematicità e finalità. La "deduzione trascendentale" delle idee e il Principio del Giudizio
No full textThe aim of this essay is to address the relationship between two transcendental deductions: that of the ideas in the Appendix to the Critique of Pure Reason and that of purposiveness in the introduction to the Critique of the Power of Judgment. The first deduction aims to justify a certain use of the ideas (namely the regulative use of reason), while the second aims to find a principle that could guide the power of judgment. The argument is that the principle seemingly missing in the first deduction, namely a transcendental principle on which the logical principle of the systematicity depends, is that of purposiveness. In the rethinking of the roles of the faculties and the introduction of the power of judgment lies a new conception of this principle and, in order to “bring the entire critical enterprise to an end”, a primacy of the purposiveness over systematicity
L'interpretazione fichtiana di Kant nel §6 della Seconda introduzione alla Dottrina della Scienza
Full text linkIn spite of Fichte’s explicit intention to bring transcendental philosophy to completion, Kant
notoriously rejected the entire Science of Knowledge. Through an analysis of §6 of the Second Introduction, where Fichte directly engages with the philosopher from Königsberg, this article aims to assess the reasons behind Fichte’s claim and Kant’s rejection
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
