1,720,961 research outputs found

    Hydrolysis of ureas. Kinetics and mechanism of the basic hydrolysis of indole-1-carboxamides and (5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine)-5-carboxamide

    No full text
    The hydroxide ion catalyzed hydrolysis of indole-1-carboxamide and indole-1-(N,N-dimethyl)carboxamide has been studied in water at 60.0° and [OH−] concentration between 0.3--2.4N. The rate constants of formation of the tetrahedral intermediate are strongly increased by N-substitution with a heteroaromatic ring in comparison with simple amides. Carbamazepine, (5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine)-5-carboxamide, a potent anticonvulsant drug, is particularly stable under these conditions

    Kinetic study of the hydrolysis of 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-3-methyltriazene in aqueous solution and in the presence of surfactants

    No full text
    The hydrlysis of 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-3-methyltriazence in solution has been studied over a pH range of 3–14. The effect of the anionic and cationic surfactants (sodium lauryl sulfate and hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide) on the rate of hydrolysis was investigated. The quaternary ammonium bromide causes a rate decrease at all pH values studied, while sodium lauryl sulfate enhances the acid-catalyzed hydrolysis and decreases the observed rate constants in the pH-independent region. The results are discussed in terms of the current theory of micellar effects

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore