1,723,222 research outputs found
Wyatt M. Elliott in militia uniform, ca. 1845
Wyatt M. Elliott, Class of 1842, in militia uniform. Copy only; no original
Letter to Dok from Gilbert M. Elliott regarding a letter about the work done in Halifax
Letter to Dok from Gilbert M. Elliott regarding a letter about the work done in Halifaxhttps://digitalmaine.com/wwI_halifax_explosion/1031/thumbnail.jp
Telegram to Gen. George McL. Presson from Gilbert M. Elliott regarding the Medical Unit at Halifax
Telegram to Gen. George McL. Presson from Gilbert M. Elliott regarding the Medical Unit at Halifaxhttps://digitalmaine.com/wwI_halifax_explosion/1002/thumbnail.jp
Telegram to Major Gilbert M. Elliott from Brig. Gen. George McL. Presson regarding furnishing doctors
Telegram to Major Gilbert M. Elliott from Brig. Gen. George McL. Presson regarding furnishing doctorshttps://digitalmaine.com/wwI_halifax_explosion/1014/thumbnail.jp
Letter to Brig. Gen. George McL. Presson from Gilbert M. Elliott regarding the Halifax Relief Party
Letter to Brig. Gen. George McL. Presson from Gilbert M. Elliott regarding the Halifax Relief Partyhttps://digitalmaine.com/wwI_halifax_explosion/1005/thumbnail.jp
Blank report of quantities of ammunition sent to Major Gilbert M. Elliott
Blank report of quantities of ammunition sent to Major Gilbert M. Elliott of the Ordnance Department, Brunswickhttps://digitalmaine.com/wwI_memoranda/1005/thumbnail.jp
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
