1,721,034 research outputs found
Small cap investing: un’analisi dei rendimenti delle small cap quotate in Italia e comparazione con il private equity
ESISTE UNO SMALL CAP EFFECT SUL MERCATO AZIONARIO ITALIANO? IN CASO AFFERMATIVO, QUALI SONO LE IMPLICAZIONI NELLA
FORMULAZIONE DI UNA STRATEGIA D’INVESTIMENTO IN QUESTA
ASSET CLASS? L’ARTICOLO ESPONE I RISULTATI DI UNA RICERCA EMPIRICA CONDOTTA SUL MERCATO ITALIANO IN UN AMPIO ORIZZONTE TEMPORALE (1988-2009) CHE HA ANALIZZATO I RENDIMENTI DEI TITOLI A PIÙ BASSA CAPITALIZZAZIONE. I DATI ESAMINATI MOSTRANO UNA PERSISTENZA DI SOVRARENDIMENTO DEI TITOLI
SMALL CAP, INDICATIVA DI UNO SMALL CAP EFFECT SUL MERCATO
AZIONARIO. LE PERFORMANCE DEI TITOLI A BASSA CAPITALIZZAZIONE SONO STATE SUCCESSIVAMENTE COMPARATE CON LE PERFORMANCE DEI FONDI DI PRIVATE EQUITY ITALIANI. QUESTA ULTERIORE
ANALISI HA PERMESSO DI COLLOCARE L’INVESTIMENTO IN SMALL
CAP QUOTATE NELLA MEDESIMA CLASSE D’INVESTIMENTO DEL PRIVATE EQUITY PER SIMILITUDINI DI RAPPORTO RISCHIO/RENDIMENTO MA CON IL BENEFICIO DI UNA MAGGIORE LIQUIDABILITA
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Laparoscopic radiofrequency of hepatocellular carcinoma using ultrasound-guided selective intrahepatic vascular occlusion
Background: The optimal treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is surgical resection. However, only a small percentage of patients are operative candidates. The authors aimed to assess a novel operative combination of laparoscopic radiofrequency (LRF) with a selective intrahepatic vascular occlusion (SIHVO) to obtain an increased rate of total necrosis and a reduced rate of local HCC recurrences. Methods: For this study, 37 patients with HCC in liver cirrhosis were submitted to LRF with SIHVO. An LRF was indicated for patients not amenable to liver resection who evidenced at least one of the following criteria: severe impairment of the coagulation tests, large tumors (but <5 cm) or multiple lesions requiring repeated punctures, superficial lesions adjacent to visceral structures, deep-sited lesions with a very difficult or impossible percutaneous approach, and short-term recurrence of HCC after percutaneous loco-regional therapies. Results: Laparoscopic ultrasound identified seven new malignant lesions (19%) undetected by preoperative imaging. There was no operative mortality. Of the 37 patients, 31 experienced no complications (84%). Computed tomography (CT) evaluation 1 month after treatment showed that a complete response with 100% necrosis had been achieved for all the patients (100%). During the follow-up period (mean, 11.8 ± 8.2 months), new malignant nodules developed in 14 patients (42%), and 36% of these recurrences were located in the same treated segment of the HCC. Conclusions: The combined LRF and SIHVO procedure proved to be a safe and effective technique at least in the short and mid term. In fact, it permitted the treatment of lesions not treatable using the percutaneous approach with a complete clearance, and it had a low morbidity rate
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
