1,721,046 research outputs found

    Frame, salute personale ed elaborazione di informazioni numeriche

    No full text
    L'effetto Framing (incominciamento) consiste nell'influenza che differenti formulazioni dello stesso messaggio o problema operano sui processi decisionali e di giudizio

    THE ITALIAN AND BRITISH PHARMACY MODEL: A COMPARISON

    No full text
    This study looks at the different methods and roles of Pharmacists in Italy and the United Kingdom. The investigation was prompted by personal experience gained during a curricular internship in summer 2021, as part of an Erasmus student exchange program at Browns Pharmacy1, a group of 11 pharmacies in Birmingham, in the English Midlands, and completed in 2022 in an Italian Pharmacy. The results are reported in the form of comparative Tables. Although Pharmacists in both Italy and the UK hold ultimate responsibility for the appropriate dispensing of medicines, delivery to the general public is conducted differently. In Italy, drug dispensing takes place on presentation of the patient at the Pharmacy with a detailed medical prescription. The Italian pharma-cist has a wide range of operational tasks: checking the appropriateness of the prescription, personally dispensing medicines in compliance with the procedures established by Legislative Decree 219/20062, receiving payment, and subsequently sending the prescription to the local Health Authority for refund. In the United Kingdom, preparation and control of medical prescriptions generally take place a priori, before the patient comes to the pharmacy. In the UK, the Pharmacist is flanked by a Pharmacy Technician, not a qualified Pharmacist, who deals with the bureaucratic aspects of dispensing. On receipt of the electronic prescription3, the Technician applies the ‘unwrapping principle’ to prepare the exact dosage prescribed by the doctor in advance of patient presentation. The Pharmacist then checks that the prescription is consistent with the therapy and that the technician has prepared it correctly, signs the label on the prepared packages, which, on request, can be delivered to the patient’s home. This well-defined distinction of roles within the U.K. pharmacy service allows the Pharmacist to focus exclusively on the therapeutic aspects of the prescription. Another particular feature Britain’s pharmaceutical service compared to the Italian system is the preparation, on request, of so-called “Trays”, containers in which the medicines prescribed are divided into individual dosages for each day of the week and into four-time slots (morning, lunchtime, afternoon and evening). A further significant difference between the two prescription management systems is the price of medicines. Set up in 1946 with the National Service Act4, the British National Health Service is based, like the Italian system, on the Universalistic Beveridge Model. However, while in Italy the prescription charge, or co-payment, varies according to the medicine, in the UK, all medicines and medical appliances under The Human Medicines Regulation Act 20125 have a fixed charge of 9.35 pounds, for every medicine or appliance on the prescription. Prescription charges are paid, however, only by those patients not falling within any of the various exemption classes. Galenic formulations have not been prepared in British pharmacies since 2010, when the General Pharmaceutical Council6 was established as the main pharmaceutical regulatory body, almost completely replacing the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain7. The management of Controlled Drugs (CDs) is very similar in both countries: regulated in Italy, by the Tables and Sections of D.P.R. 309/19908, and in the UK, by Schedules in the 2013 Controlled Drugs Regulation9. Both systems require locked cabinet custody of certain drug categories, purchase in compliance with predefined procedure and documentation, and a Register of inbound and outbound drug transfer. Likewise, pharmacies in both countries supply self-diagnosis tests and vaccinations. However, UK pharmacies do not have a hospital/specialist medical visit booking system, an innovative service now offered by Italian pharmacies and part of the so-called "Pharmacy of Services" model. 1. https://brownspharmacy.com/; 2. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2006/06/21/006G0237/sg; 3. https://digital.nhs.uk/services/electronic-prescription-service; 4. https://www.nhs.uk/; 5. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/1916/contents; Gordon E Appelbe and Joy Wingfield – “Dale and Appelbe’s Pharmacy and Medicines Law” Tenth Edition 2014; 6. https://www.pharmacyregulation.org/; 7. https://www.rpharms.com/; 8. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/1990/10/31/090G0363/sg; 9. BML group and Royal Pharmaceutical Society – “BNF (British National Formulary)” Edition 81 March-September 2021; Royal Pharmaceutical Society – “Medicines, Ethics and Practice” Edition 43 July 2019; https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/373/contents/made

    LANDSCAPE REVIEW OF IMPLEMENTING AND DELEGATED ACTS APPLICABLE TO EUROPEAN MEDICAL DEVICE REGULATION 745/2017

    No full text
    Introduced by the Lisbon Treaty, Implementing and Delegated Acts are a new source of European law. Disciplined respectively by Articles 290 and 291 of the TFEU, they aim to improve the effectiveness of the European decision-making process by simplifying the implementation/execution procedure. This study investigated the Implementing and Delegates Acts pertinent to EU Regulation 745/2017 on medical devices. Although complicated by the fact that these Acts are issued at different times and with different modalities following the entry into force of the Regulation to which they refer, our research was facilitated by the Eur-Lex database. Data extrapolation was followed by careful analysis of each Act and the creation of Tables with succinct but comprehensive summaries in chronological order. The result is an updated overview of a complex ongoing regulatory process. While eight Implementing Acts pursuant to Art 35, 27.2, 106.17, 10.6, 33.8, 5.6, 10.6 of the MDR have been introduced by the Commission at different times, none of the twelve Delegated Acts referred to in Article 115 of the Regulation has yet been forthcoming. Unlike Implementing Acts, Implementing Decisions n. 2021/1182 and 2022/6 stand out for their clarity, with the specific ISO regulation on medical devices official acknowledged as a binding requirement. - Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC (Text with EEA relevance.) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/?uri=celex:32017R0745#:~:text=Regolamento% 20(UE) 2017% 2F745,rilevante ai fini del SEE. ) - Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT:it:PDF - C. Rivadossi, Il TFUE e le nuove fonti del diritto dell’Unione Europea. Atti delegati e Atti di esecuzione a confronto, 12 ottobre 2014, Cattedra di diritto pubblico, Università di Brescia. https://www.forumcostituzionale.it/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/rivadossi.pdf - J. Mendes, Delegated and Implementing Rule Making: Proceduralisation and Consultation De-sign, European Law Journal, Vol. 19, No. 1, January 2013, pp. 22–41 - European Commission, questions and answers European nomenclature of medical devices https://ec.europa.eu/health/system/files/2021-10/md_q-a_emdn_it_0.pdfo - European Standardization https://www.cencenelec.eu/european-standardization/ - https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-making-process/adopting-eu-law/implementing-and-delegated-acts_it - Comitology https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-making-process/adopting-eu-law/implementing-and-delegatedacts/comitology_it - https://eurlex.europa.eu/search.html?SUBDOM_INIT=ALL_ALL&DTS_SUBDOM=ALL_ALL&DTS_DOM=ALL&lang=en&type=advanced&DB_IMPLEMENTING=32017R0745&qid=1636408561747 - https://eurlex.europa.eu/search.html?SUBDOM_INIT=ALL_ALL&DTS_SUBDOM=ALL_ALL&DTS_DOM=ALL&DB_DELEGATED=32017R0745&lang=en&type=advanced&qid=1636408628734rire test

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    TRADE SECRETS, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND VACCINE

    No full text
    Know-how is a set of intangible techniques and practices characterized by secrecy such as to provide the holder with an economic advantage. Although this definition is not sufficient to ensure patent coverage, trade secrets can nonetheless be protected under law. EU Directive 2016/943 establishes that trade secrets constitute any information that is: a) secret in the sense that “it is not, as a body or in the precise configuration and assembly of its components, generally known among or readily accessible to persons within the circles that normally deal with the kind of information in question”; b) has commercial value because it is secret; (c) has been “subject to reasonable steps under the circumstances, by the person lawfully in control of the information, to keep it secret”. The Covid-19 pandemic caused by a new coronavirus confronted the scientific community with a major challenge: developing a vaccine. An immense effort led to the development and subsequent availability of several effective vaccines and therapies, which, however, are not accessible to the entire world population, especially those in middle and low-income countries. Since research into and development of a new drug entails intangible knowledge and processes protected by trade secret regulations, one hundred international intellectual property specialists have petitioned for a temporary derogation from the TRIPs agreements protecting intellectual property. With its resolution of 10 June 2021, the European Parliament has also come out in favour of a temporary modification to the TRIPs agreements. However, the parties involved have yet to reach a consensus. This study looks at the possible ways in which the parties could achieve an agreement that would protect their rights. - DIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/943 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 8 June 2016 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure (Text with EEA relevance) - Solenne V., P&SLegal, https://www.pandslegal.it/life-science/proprieta-intellettuale-e-salute-in-emergenza/ consulted on 20/04/2022; -Tajoli L., Ispi on line, https://www.ispionline.it/it/pubblicazione/trade-vaccini-liberi-tutti-30436 ; consulted on 20/04/2022; - Zanoli E., Il Sole 24 ore, https://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/vaccini-ostacoli-licenza-obbligatoria-ADoegkPB; consulted on 03/05/2022; - Parlamento Europeo, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-9-2021-0306_IT.html ; consulted on 15/05/2022

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore