102 research outputs found

    Essays on risk-taking behaviors: An experimental analysis

    No full text
    The effect of competition on risk-taking in contests (with Jan Potters) We investigate, theoretically and experimentally, the effect of competition on risktaking in a contest in which players only decide on the level of risk they wish to take. Taking more risk implies a chance of a higher performance, but also implies a higher chance of failure. We vary the level of competition in two ways: by varying the number of players (2 players versus 8 players), and by varying the sensitivity of the contest to differences in performance (lottery contest versus all-pay auction). Our results show that there is a significant interaction effect between the two treatments, suggesting that players are particularly prone to take more risks if both the number of players and the sensitivity to performance are higher. *************************************************************************************************** Dual-process cognition of risk-taking decisions: an online experiment In this study, we experimentally investigate the role of the mode of cognition on risk taking. In an online experiment, we exogenously manipulate the mode of cognition by means of a motivation treatment, where subjects are required to motivate their choice and, hence, are more likely to make a choice under deliberation. Our results show a significant effect of the motivation treatment on risk-taking, suggesting that subjects are more prone to take risk when deliberation is active. This effect is stronger and more significant if we consider only subjects who have no probabilistic understanding of the decision problem. Based on our experimental findings, we argue that deliberation and comprehension are substitutes when individuals make decisions involving risk. ****************************************************************************************************** The mode of cognition mediates the relationship between personality traits and risk-taking: an online experiment In this study, we experimentally investigate how the mode of cognition mediates the relation between personality traits and risk taking. In an online experiment, the mode of cognition is exogenously manipulated by asking subjects to motivate their choice in order to invoke more deliberative decisions. Although the evidence is not particularly strong, it appears to be suggestive for a role of the mode of cognition in the relation between personality traits and risk-taking behaviors. We find that higher levels of Conscientiousness, Neuroticism and Openness to Experience are associated with a lower degree of risk-taking in the control treatment, and that, in the treatment with motivation, Agreeableness has a qualitatively similar association. Moreover, our experimental results show that risk taking behaviors are more affected by traits of personality when decisions are taken under a more intuitive mode of cognition

    Motivating risky choices increases risk taking

    No full text
    Westudy the impact of the mode of cognition on risk taking. In an online experiment, we ask participants to make a simple decision involving risk by performing the bomb risk elicitation task. The control group undergoes no manipulation, while in the treatment group, we exogenously manipulate the mode of cognition by requiring subjects to write down a text that motivates their risky choice before making a decision. Such motivation treatment is meant to induce more reflection upon the action to be taken. Our results show an effect of the motivation treatment on risk taking, suggesting that higher reflection makes subjects more prone to risk taking. The effect is stronger among participants who have a limited understanding of the probability distribution involved in the decision task. Based onthesefindings, wesuggestthat reflection and comprehension may be substitutes in decision making when there is risk involved

    Delaying and motivating decisions in the (Bully) dictator game

    No full text
    We investigate experimentally how decisions in the Dictator Game are affected by cognitive manipulations aimed at promoting greater reliance on deliberation. Specifically, we run an online experiment where we have 6 distinct experimental conditions resulting from the combination of 2 conditions for the Dictator Game (non-bully: the dictator is initially endowed with all the money; bully: the initial endowment is equally split), and 3 conditions for the cognitive manipulations (time delay: decisions are delayed; motivated delay: decisions are delayed and a written motivation is required; control: no manipulation). We find that the equal initial endowment leads the dictator to get less, confirming in the online setting previous evidence from the lab. Further, our findings suggest that the request to write a motivation makes subjects take less for themselves with respect to the mere request to wait some time before choosing

    Real-effort in the Multilevel Public Goods Game

    No full text
    We investigate the extent to which a real-effort effect and an inequality effect impact individuals' prosocial behavior in the multilevel public goods game. We explore two symmetrical treatments: one where everyone participates in a preliminary task to obtain their initial endowment, and another where no one does, to assess the real-effort effect. Additionally, we examine two asymmetrical treatments where only individuals from one local group engage in the preliminary task to study the inequality effect. We find evidence that the contribution to the local public good is stable across all treatments, while the contribution to the global public good is significantly lower when both groups perform the preliminary task

    European Union legislation at local level

    No full text
    written by: Lorenzo SpadoniLiteraturverzeichnis: Blatt 69-73Masterarbeit Paris Lodron Universität Salzburg 202

    Back to the future: An experiment on ecological restoration

    No full text
    The urgency of climate, biodiversity, and pollution crises has prompted international and national institutions to move beyond the prevention and mitigation of damages and to design policies aimed at promoting ecological restoration. In this paper, we address this emerging policy challenge by presenting experimental evidence on individuals’ propensity to contribute to restoration activities. Specifically, our design links a common pool resource game to a public good game to investigate how previous resource exploitation influences restoration decisions. We find that history matters since subjects who participate in resource depletion show a different behavior as compared to subjects who are only called to restore it. Specifically, while the former are subject to behavioral lock-ins that influence the success of restoration, the latter are more prompt to restore the more the resource is depleted

    Gli effetti della modalità di comunicazione del rischio sulle scelte di investimento finanziario: i risultati di un esperimento

    No full text
    La modalità in cui sono presentate le scelte in condizioni di rischio può influenzare la scelta di investimento finanziario? In questo lavoro vengono riportati i risultati di un esperimento in cui i partecipanti fronteggiano una serie di decisioni di investimento tra un titolo con rendimento certo e uno con rendimento rischioso presentate in diverse modalità “visive”: istogramma, albero e verbale. I dati raccolti mostrano che le scelte di investimento variano sulla base delle modalità di presentazione del titolo rischioso. In particolare, i soggetti sono disposti a farsi carico di un maggiore rischio quando il titolo rischioso è presentato con una modalità a loro più familiare (preferita)

    Laboratory Investigation on the Use of Geocomposites as Waterproofing Systems for Concrete Bridge Decks

    No full text
    Water seepage in cement concrete structures is one of the main sources of degradation, especially for concrete bridge decks. Therefore, the protection of these strategic structures is a crucial task for civil engineers nowadays. In this context, this study focuses on the use of geocomposites as waterproofing systems for concrete bridge decks. Four geocomposites with different characteristics were compared based on a dedicated testing protocol. The influence of the concrete surface condition (dry or wet) as well as the type and dosage of the primer was also studied. Multilayered slabs, composed of cement concrete, primer, geocomposite, and asphalt concrete, were prepared in the laboratory. The proposed testing protocol includes four types of tests, i.e., shear bond tests (SBT) with the Leutner device, pull-off tests, binder bond strength (BBS) tests, and watertightness tests. Most configurations exhibited good shear resistance and adhesion properties. In general, the geocomposite type and the primer dosage had a significant influence on the behavior of the system, whereas the concrete condition and the primer type had no statistically significant effect. In most cases, the weak point of the system was the interface between cement concrete and primer or between primer and geocomposite. Finally, all geocomposites successfully passed the watertightness test. The proposed testing protocol can be useful for producers to design and optimize their products as well as for road agencies to prequalify the product in the laboratory on the basis of clear performance-based technical specifications
    corecore