1,720,954 research outputs found
RAZÃO PURA VERSUS METAFÍSICA DA RAZÃO HUMANA
The truth and science have been presented, accepted, and lived in the nihilistic concept not because the value of the human being is null, but because such indoctrination zeroed in on the scientific basis from the concept of the blank slate that made us believe in the innate nullity of an inert meat loaf that from its first cry never stopped whining. As long as there is life, the being will seek meaning in death, as he believed empirically that there was no hope that would safeguard him. The articles of faith presented by Hilton Japiassu, which support the scientificist ideology, indoctrinate not only the undifferentiated object giving it the false impression of a subject, but also the non-existent Vygotskian individual taken from its zone of proximal development to place it in the potential zone where there will only exist as a social being. Science presents itself as omniscient and becomes the only true knowledge and this truth becomes indoctrination. Science presents itself omnipotent and steals hope and belief in anything other than itself, becomes omnipresent and becomes part of all businesses, actions, thoughts, and consciences. The purpose of this article is to corroborate the article by Hilton Japiassu (2016) and is justified by the scientism and indoctrination that support contemporary science and truth. The problem question to be answered is: Are Japiassu\u27s Articles of Faith legitimate foundations of true science? By the corroboration itself, the author\u27s hypothesis is that it is not.La verdad y la ciencia se han presentado, aceptado y vivido en el concepto nihilista no porque el valor del ser humano sea nulo, sino porque tal adoctrinamiento se centró en la base científica del concepto que nos hizo creer en lo innato. nulidad de un pastel de carne inerte que desde su primer grito no dejó de gemir. Mientras haya vida, el ser buscará sentido en la muerte, pues creía empíricamente que no había esperanza que lo salvaguardara. Los artículos de fe presentados por Hilton Japiassu, que sustentan la ideología cientificista, adoctrinan no solo al objeto indiferenciado dándole la falsa impresión de un sujeto, sino también al inexistente individuo vygotskiano sacado de su zona de desarrollo próximo para ubicarlo en el Zona potencial donde solo existirá como ser social. La ciencia se presenta omnisciente y se convierte en el único conocimiento verdadero y esta verdad se convierte en adoctrinamiento. La ciencia se presenta omnipotente y roba la esperanza y la fe en cualquier otra cosa que no sea ella misma, se vuelve omnipresente y se convierte en parte de todos los negocios, acciones, pensamientos y conciencias. El propósito de este artículo es corroborar el artículo de Hilton Japiassu (2016) y está justificado por el cientificismo y adoctrinamiento que sustentan la ciencia y la verdad contemporáneas. La pregunta del problema que debe responderse es: ¿Son los Artículos de Fe de Japiassu fundamentos legítimos de la ciencia verdadera? Por la propia corroboración, la hipótesis del autor es que no lo es.A verdade e a ciência têm sido apresentadas, aceitas e vividas no conceito niilista não porque o valor do ser humano seja nulo, mas porque a tal doutrinação o zerou na base cientificista desde o conceito da tábula rasa que fez crer na nulidade inata de um inerte bolo de carne que a partir de seu primeiro choro não parou mais de se lamentar. Enquanto houver vida o ser buscará sentido na morte, pois creu empiricamente não haver esperança que o salvaguardasse. Os artigos de fé apresentados por Hilton Japiassu que fundamentam a ideologia cientificista doutrinam, não apenas, o objeto indiferenciado dando-lhe a falsa impressão de sujeito, como também o indivíduo inexistente vygotskiano tirado de sua zona de desenvolvimento proximal para colocá-lo na zona potencial onde existirá apenas como ser social. A ciência se apresenta onisciente e passa a ser o único saber verdadeiro e essa verdade se torna em doutrinação. A ciência se apresenta onipotente e rouba a esperança e a crença em qualquer outra coisa que não seja ela mesma, se torna onipresente e passa a fazer parte de todos os negócios, ações, pensamentos e consciências. O objetivo deste artigo é corroborar com o artigo de Hilton Japiassu (2016) e justifica-se pelo cientificismo e doutrinação que embalam a ciência e a verdade contemporâneas. O pergunta problema a ser a ser respondida é: Os artigos de fé de Japiassu são fundamentos legítimos da verdadeira ciência? Pela própria corroboração a hipótese do autor é que não seja. 
APRENDIZAGEM E DOUTRINAÇÃO
Every being who learns chooses his learning style from two sources, the one that flows from the innate/individual or the one that comes from the empirical/environment. The improvement of learning styles will grow in the ascending spiral of the movement of cognitive resources (Piaget, 1977) which, in turn, will depend on the significance of the results of this processing which, on the one hand, will become the assumptions of Ausubel (1978) by acquiring a moral and/or true value judgment to the balance of the triads: psychomotor (cognition/motricity/affection) (Silva, 2020); psychoanalytical (id/ego/superego) (Freud, 2010) and morphological (Telebrain Lobos/Limbic System/Central Nervous System) (Wecker, 2001) that equate to post-disturbance equilibration (Piaget, 1977) and, therefore, true to the innate or not in the absence of this balance; on the other side they will become mere informational signs indicating a possibility of meaning at best or psychotic at worst. According to Wallon, the affective dimension of the psychomotor triad is the beginning of the equilibrium or imbalance of the knowing being. “Sensitivity has an affective and a cognitive level, as well as motor skills and language. The organic revolution caused by emotion is presented in sensations: visceral, metabolic, respiratory, decreased acuity of perception of the outside [...]” (Wallon 1879-1962 as quoted in Dantas, 1992, p. 93). The problem with the article is: would Wallon be right? What justifies the research.Todo ser que aprende elige su estilo de aprendizaje a partir de dos fuentes, la que fluye de lo innato / individual o la que proviene de lo empírico / entorno. La mejora de los estilos de aprendizaje crecerá en la espiral ascendente del movimiento de los recursos cognitivos (Piaget, 1977) que, a su vez, dependerá de la significación de los resultados de este procesamiento que, por un lado, se convertirán en los supuestos de Ausubel (1978) al adquirir un juicio de valor moral y / o verdadero al equilibrio de las tríadas: psicomotriz (cognición / motricidad / afecto) (Silva, 2020); psicoanalítico (id / ego / superyó) (Freud, 2010) y morfológico (Telebrain Lobos / Sistema límbico / Sistema nervioso central) (Wecker, 2001) que equivale a un equilibrio post-perturbación (Piaget, 1977) y, por tanto, fiel a la innato o no en ausencia de este equilibrio; por otro lado, se convertirán en meros signos informativos que indican una posibilidad de significado en el mejor de los casos o psicóticos en el peor. Según Wallon, la dimensión afectiva de la tríada psicomotora es el comienzo del equilibrio o desequilibrio del ser conocedor. “La sensibilidad tiene un nivel afectivo y cognitivo, así como la motricidad y el lenguaje. La revolución orgánica provocada por la emoción se presenta en sensaciones: visceral, metabólica, respiratoria, disminución de la agudeza de percepción del exterior [...] ”(Wallon 1879-1962 citado en Dantas, 1992, p. 93). El problema con el artículo es: ¿tendría razón Wallon? Qué justifica la investigación.Todo o ser que aprende escolhe seu estilo de aprendizagem a partir de duas fontes, a que flui do inato/indivíduo ou a que vem do empírico/meio. O aprimoramento dos estilos de aprendizagem crescerá no espiral ascendente da movimentação de recursos cognitivos (Piaget, 1977) que, por sua vez, dependerá da significação dos resultados desse processamento que de um lado se converterá nos assunçores de Ausubel (1978) por adquirirem uma moral e/ou juízo de valor verdadeiro à equilibração das tríades: psicomotora (cognição/ motricidade/ afetividade) (Silva, 2020); psicanalítica (id/ ego/ superego) (Freud, 2010) e morfológica (Lobos do Telencéfalo/ Sistema Límbico/ Sistema Nervoso Central) (Wecker, 2001) que se equiparam a equilibração-pós-perturbação (Piaget, 1977) e, portanto, verdadeiro ao inato ou não na falta dessa equilibração; do outro lado se tornarão em simples placas informativas indicando uma possibilidade de significado na melhor das hipóteses ou psicóticos na pior delas. Segundo Wallon a dimensão afetiva da tríade psicomotora é que principia a equilibração ou desequilibração do ser cognoscente. “A sensibilidade tem um nível afetivo e outro cognitivo, assim como a motricidade e a linguagem. A revolução orgânica provocada pela emoção se apresenta nas sensações: viscerais, metabólicas, respiratórias, diminuição da acuidade da percepção do exterior [...]” (Wallon 1879-1962 como citado em Dantas, 1992, p. 93). O problema do artigo é: Wallon estaria certo? O que justifica a pesquisa
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
