103,937 research outputs found
Dicronychus equisetioides Lohse 1976
No full textDicronychus equisetioides Lohse, 1976 Material examined. 1 specimen, male: Croatia: “ CROATIA, Kakma, sandy pine-forest, 7.V. 2006., leg. Attila Kotán” (HNHM). Distribution. E: AU BE CZ DE FR GE HU IT LA PL SK SV (Cate 2007). New to Croatia.Published as part of Németh, T. & Platia, G., 2014, On some Palaearctic click beetles deposited in the Hungarian Natural History Museum, 2 (Coleoptera: Elateridae) *, pp. 451-490 in Zootaxa 3841 (4) on page 474, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3841.4.1, http://zenodo.org/record/22939
Designing Appropriate Feedback for Virtual Agents and Robots.
No full textLohse M, van Welbergen H. Designing Appropriate Feedback for Virtual Agents and Robots. In: Position paper at RO-MAN 2012 Workshop Robot Feedback in Human-Robot Interaction. How to Make a Robot Readable for a Human Interaction Partner. 2012
Menschlich sein — mit oder ohne Gott ?, éd. Jens Marten Lohse (Coll. T — Reihe, 1), 1969
No full textGesché Adolphe. Menschlich sein — mit oder ohne Gott ?, éd. Jens Marten Lohse (Coll. T — Reihe, 1), 1969. In: Revue théologique de Louvain, 1ᵉ année, fasc. 3, 1970. p. 350
Bledius frisius LOHSE 1978
No full text<i>Bledius frisius</i> LOHSE, 1978 <p>A d d i t i o n a l r e c o r d: Samos: 2 exs., Psili Ammos, 29.IV.2008, leg. Rossi (cAss).</p> <p> C o m m e n t: <i>Bledius frisius</i> had been reported from Samos before (ASSING 2015c).</p>Published as part of <i>Assing, Volker, 2017, On the Staphylinidae of the Greek island Kos, with an appendix on Carabidae and additional records from other islands (Insecta Coleoptera), pp. 191-205 in Linzer biologische Beiträge 49 (1)</i> on page 201, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5356613">10.5281/zenodo.5356613</a>
Lesteva lusitana Lohse 1955
No full textLesteva (s.str.) lusitana Lohse, 1955 (Figs. 8, 11, 18–19) Lesteva lusitana Lohse, 1955b: 513; Lohse 1960: 3 Type material examined. Holotype, ♂ [apical part of the aedeagus slightly damaged; aedeagus contained in a small glass vial with a cork pinned under the card with the beetle]: ‘Covilhã | 20.5.[19]12’ , ‘Samml. | K. Daniel’ , ‘Typus [handwritten in blue] | Lesteva | lusitana n.sp. [handwritten in blue] | G. A. Lohse det.’ , ‘ Holotypus [printed] ♂ | Lesteva | lusitana Lohse | 1955 | Staatssamml.München [printed]’ , ‘Zool. Staatsslg. | München’ (ZSM). Cotype, 1 ♂: ‘Covilhã | 20.5.[19]12’ , ‘Sammlg. | K. Daniel’ , [red full label], ‘cotypus’ , ‘ Lesteva | lusitana n.sp. [handwritten]’ , ‘G.A. Lohse det.’ , ‘Coll. | G.A. Lohse | MHNG-1994’ , ‘COTYPE | Lesteva | lusitana sp. n. | Det. Lohse 1955’ , ‘MHNG | ENTO | 00087329’ , ‘ Lesteva (s.str.) | lusitana Lohse, 1955 | Shavrin A.V. det. 2021’ (MHNG). Material examined. PORTUGAL: ALTO TÂMEGA: 3 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀: Serra do Gêres. 800 m a.s.l. 26.05.1992. P. Wunderle leg. (cW); CASTELO BRANCO: 2 ♂♂: Sierra de Estrela. H. Franz leg. (NHMW); 1 ♂, 1 ♀: Estrela. 1950 m a.s.l. 10.07.1979. G. Osella leg. (cZan); SPAIN: GALICIA: 1 ♂: Lugo, Valle de Florenza. H. Franz leg. (NHMW); 1 ♂: Sierra de Queixa. 1300-1780 m a.s.l. 27- 28.07.1992. M. Tronquet leg. (cZan); CASTILLA Y LEÓN: 1 ♂: Cordillera Cantabrica, NE Puerto de Ventana, 43°04’N - 6°00’W. 1585 m a.s.l. 13.06.2000. D.W. Wrase leg. (cSch); CANTABRIA: 1 ♀: Reinosa, Campoo Cebernigua, 15 km NW Reinosa. 06.06.1991. P. Wunderle leg. (cW); ASTURIAS: 1 ♂: Picos de Europa, Covadonga, Lago Enol. 1200 m a.s.l. 02.06.1990. (cZan); 1 ♀: same data, Cornion. 2000 m a.s.l. 04.07.1994. T. Assmann leg. (cA). Redescription. Measurements (n=15): HW: 0.67–0.70; HL: 0.45–0.50; OL: 0.20–0.25; LT: 0.08–0.10; AL (holotype): 1.69; PL: 0.62–0.70; PWMax: 0.72–0.80; PWMin: 0.60–0.66; EL: 1.50–1.63; ESL: 1.35–1.55; EW: 1.35–1.40; MTbL (holotype): 0.92; MTrL (holotype): 0.50; AW: 1.18–1.38; AedL: 0.82–0.86; FL: 2.62–3.18; TL: 3.20–4.00 (holotype: 3.90). Body brown to reddish-brown, sometimes with slightly paler elytra; antennae and legs yellow-brown; mouthparts and tarsi yellow to yellow-brown. Punctation of head moderately large, sparser in middle and denser between longitudinal depressions and eyes; punctation of pronotum dense, slightly deeper than that of head. Habitus as in Fig. 11. Head 1.4 times as broad as long, with distinctly elevated middle portion, indistinct transverse impression at level of middle length of eyes and separated from lateral portions by very deep longitudinal depressions; eyes more than twice as long as temples. Antennae reaching one third of elytra when reclined, with slightly thickened antennomeres 7–10; antennomeres 2–7 approximately equal in length, 8–9 slightly shorter than 7, 10 about as long as and slightly broader than 9. Pronotum slightly broader than long, about as wide as head, widest in anterior third portion, sharply narrowed toward subparallel latero-basal margins, with obtuse or subacute hind angles; mediobasal third of pronotum with distinct transverse impression. Elytra about as broad as long, more than twice as long as pronotum. Metatarsus less than twice as long as metatibia, with basal metatarsomere slightly shorter than combined length of tarsomeres 2–3. Abdomen with paired transverse tomentose spots in the middle of abdominal tergite V. Male. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII rounded. Apical margin of abdominal sternite VIII widely concaved.Aedeagus with very wide basal portion, strongly narrowed toward acute apex; parameres narrow, widened apically, distinctly exceeding apex of median lobe, with four long apical and preapical setae; internal sac moderately short and narrow (Fig. 18). Lateral aspect of aedeagus as in Fig. 19. Female. Apical margins of abdominal tergites and sternites VIII rounded. Comparative notes. Regarding the coloration, large and deep punctation of the pronotum, the shape of the apical margins of the elytra, and the length of the apical metarsomere, L. lusitana is similar to L. monticola and L. osellai sp.n. Regarding the shape of antennomeres it is more similar to L. monticola, from which it is distinguished by smaller body size and broader pronotum. From both these species, it differs by the shape of narrow median lobe, significantly longer parameres, and the different structure of the internal sac. Distribution. The species is known from several localities in central Portugal and the north-western provinces of Spain (Fig. 8). Natural history. Specimens were collected at elevations from 450 to 1585 m a.s.l. Detailed ecological data are unknown. Remarks. The species is here recorded from Spain for the first time.Published as part of Shavrin, Alexey V. & Zanetti, Adriano, 2021, Review of the genus Lesteva Latreille, 1797 (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Omaliinae Anthophagini) of the Iberian Peninsula, pp. 401-427 in Zootaxa 4966 (4) on pages 412-414, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4966.4.1, http://zenodo.org/record/473866
Realising human-robot collaboration in manufacturing? A journey towards industry 5.0 amid organisational paradoxical tensions
No full textHuman-robot collaboration is envisioned as a cornerstone of the future ‘ideal’ industry (Industry 5.0)—resilient,
sustainable, and human-centred. While this goal has not yet been fully realised, advancements in collaborative
robotic technology are expected to accelerate progress. Central to this vision is a workforce equipped with the
skills necessary to collaborate effectively with robots in ‘ideal’ hybrid teams. Existing literature widely supports
this optimistic outlook, suggesting that with the right technological developments, workforce reskilling and
upskilling, and the resolution of key ethical and social concerns, human-robot collaboration in manufacturing
will eventually become a reality. In this paper, we draw on a one-year field study that engaged with 39 representatives
from industry, research, and other key stakeholders in both the technical and human factors of
collaborative applications. Using constructive grounded theory and abductive reasoning, we challenge the
assumption that the trajectory towards human-robot collaboration is straightforward or can be resolved through
a one-time solution. Instead, our results reveal a journey marked by a series of paradoxical tensions, providing a
fresh perspective on the complexities and unexpected empirical ‘surprises’ that define the transition towards
Industry 5.0. We employ Paradox Theory to examine and elucidate this evolving journey, where paradoxes—
such as automation vs augmentation, technical efficiency vs human wellbeing, and exploration vs exploitation—
emerge, shift, and are managed in unexpected ways, revealing interdependencies between different types
of responses across micro, meso, and macro levels of analysis. Extending beyond current theorisations on the
implementation of Industry 5.0, our study contributes substantively and theoretically to understanding the
evolving socio-technical complexities that shape this transition, highlighting the interplay between technological
advancements, organisational dynamics, and workforce adaptation
Veränderung professionellen Wissens über verschiedene Phasen der Lehrerbildung hinweg. Metaanalytische Integration der Befunde aus dem Forschungsprogramm „Effektive Kompetenzdiagnose in der Lehrerbildung“.
No full textIn: H. Lohse-Bossenz, M. Rehm, M. Friesen, M. Seidenfuß, J. Rutsch, M. Vogel, T. Dörfler (Hrsg.), Professionalisierung in der Lehrerbildung. Erkenntnisse und Perspektiven des interdisziplinären Forschungsprogramms ""Effektive Kompetenzdiagose in der Lehrerbildung""Publishe
Letter, [Author unclear] to Paulina T. Merritt
No full textHandwritten letter to Paulina Merritt from an unknown author, October 1, 1876.
Investigating the influence of situations and expectations on user behavior : empirical analyses in human-robot interaction
No full textLohse M. Investigating the influence of situations and expectations on user behavior : empirical analyses in human-robot interaction. Bielefeld (Germany): Bielefeld University; 2010.Social sciences are becoming increasingly important for robotics research as work goes on to enable service robots to interact with inexperienced users. This endeavor can only be successful if the robots learn to interpret the users' behavior reliably and, in turn, provide feedback for the users, which enables them to understand the robot.
In order to achieve this goal, the thesis introduces an approach to describe the interaction situation as a dynamic construct with different levels of specificity. The situation concept is the starting point for a model which aims to explain the users' behavior. The second important component of the model is the expectations of the users with respect to the robot. Both the situation and the expectations are shown to be the main determinants of the users' behaviors.
With this theoretical background in mind, the thesis examines interactions from a home tour scenario in which a human teaches a robot about rooms and objects within them. To analyze the human expectations and behaviors in this situation, two main novel methods have been developed. In particular, a quantitative method for the analysis of the users' behavior repertoires (speech, gesture, eye gaze, body orientation, etc.) is introduced. The approach focuses on the interaction level, which describes the interplay between the robot and the user. In the second novel method, also the system level is taken into account, which includes the robot components and their interplay. This method serves for a detailed task analysis and helps to identify problems that occur in the interaction.
By applying these methods, the thesis contributes to the identification of underlying expectations that allow future behavior of the users to be predicted in particular situations. Knowledge about the users' behavior repertoires serves as a cue for the robot about the state of the interaction and the task the users aim to accomplish. Therefore, it enables robot developers to adapt the interaction models of the components to the situation, actual user expectations, and behaviors. The work provides a deeper understanding of the role of expectations in human-robot interaction and contributes to the interaction and system design of interactive robots
- …
