199,236 research outputs found
Interview with publisher William Loeb
Interview of Barry M. Goldwater by William Loeb, Manchester Union Leader, press release
Personal Papers (MS 80-0002)
Report from Carl M. Loeb, Rhoades & Co. discussing the Middle-East aspects of American oil companies. It includes background information; potential earnings; company descriptions; charts about reserves, consumption, production, and producers; and a map of concessions
Letter from W[illia]m Loeb, Jr. to Henry G. Bryant, 1906 Feb 28.
Copy of letter acknowledging election to Honorary membership received from Secretary of President Roosevelt.THE WHITE HOUSE,Washington.February 28, 1906.My dear Sir:Your letter of the 27th instant, notifying the President of his election to honorary membership in the American Alpine Club, has been received. The President appreciates the compliment and is glad to accept honorary membership in your organization.Very truly yours,WM. LOEB, JR.,Secretary to the President.[illegible]Mr. Henry G. Bryant,Secretary, American Alpine Club,Room 806 Land Title Building,Philadelphia.06229https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/jmcl/29733/thumbnail.jp
Élégie sur la mort de M. Loeb
Élégie sur la mort de M. Loeb. In: Revue des études juives, tome 24, n°47, janvier-mars 1892. p. 4
M. Joseph Derenbourg
Loeb Isidore, Kahn Zadoc. M. Joseph Derenbourg. In: Revue des études juives, tome 22, n°43, janvier-mars 1891. pp. 4-7
Personal Papers (MS 80-0002)
Telegram sent by I. H. Kempner to Carl M. Loeb and Rhoades and Co. discussing share purchases
Loeb Extension and Loeb Equivalence
In Keisler and Sun (2004), the authors raise several open problems on Loeb
equivalences between various internal probability spaces. We provide
counter-examples for the first two open problems. Moreover, we reduce the third
open problem to the following question: Is the internal algebra generated by
the union of two Loeb equivalent internal algebras a subset of the Loeb
extension of any one of the internal algebra?Comment: 10 page
William Loeb Jr. memorandum to Will H. Hays, July 7, 1920
In this memorandum dated July 7, 1920, William Loeb Jr., describes how the Republican Party managed the 1904 and 1908 presidential campaigns, and shares with Will H. Hays, chairman of the Republican National Committee, what worked well in terms of managing press and correspondence. Loeb suggests that the republican nominee work mostly through the National Committee headquarters, rather than his personal headquarters.
This letter is part of the Warren G. Harding Papers (MSS 345). This collection includes correspondence, business records, and other materials documenting Harding’s business career as owner and editor-in-chief of The Daily Marion Star, as well as the various stages of his political career. A significant portion of the collection, and what’s available on Ohio Memory, highlights his 1920 presidential campaign, spanning just before publicly announcing his candidacy to handily defeating Ohio Governor James M. Cox in the election. Correspondents include both Ohio and national businessmen, political figures, and ordinary citizens writing with questions, support, congratulatory notes, and campaign advice. Some of the most interesting insights into the tumultuous political climate in the U.S., the extreme factionalism within the Republican Party in Ohio, and Harding’s campaign strategies are described in letters between Harding and his campaign manager, Harry M. Daugherty. Some of the topics addressed include women’s suffrage, Prohibition, the League of Nations, African American representation and issues, and lingering peace negotiations following World War I
Discours prononcé sur la tombe de M. Loeb
Reinach Théodore. Discours prononcé sur la tombe de M. Loeb. In: Revue des études juives, tome 24, n°47, janvier-mars 1892. pp. 2-4
The literary phenomenon of 'conflation’ in the reworking of Paul’s letter to the Colossians by the author of the letter to the Ephesians
This thesis is concerned with the nature of the relationship of the Letter to the Ephesians (Eph) to Paul's Letter to the Colossians (Col).The first three chapters seek to argue that this relationship should be designated as "literary dependent". In Chapter I the suggestion made by A.T. Lincoln (Dallas [Texas], 1990) that the contemporary redaction of the Letter of Aristeas by Josephus in his Jewish Antiquities, Book XII, §§ 11-118 is similar to the use the author of Eph made of Col, is exposed to critical review. Chapter II focuses on the phenomenon of repeated 'conflation' in Eph. This literary phenomenon entails that several 'Colossian' texts from different parts of Col are conflated by the author of Eph into one passage and is subjected to exhaustive analysis. It is argued that conflation is the main feature of the literary dependence of Eph on Col but does not occur in Josephus' reworking of the Letter of Aristeas. Chapter III continues the comparison between the method of reworking employed in the Jewish Antiquities and in Eph by pointing out that the fluctuation in verbatim agreement of one document with its source can be meaningful. Chapter IV provides the new synopsis of both letters on which the whole examination is based. This synoptic overview is a desideratum since the previous synoptic editions of the Greek text of both letters by E.J. Goodspeed (Chicago, 1933) and C.L. Mitton (Oxford, 1951) are not accurate enough and unsuitable for research that focuses on the conflations of 'Colossian' verses in Eph. The fifth and last chapter deals with the question why Eph is literary dependent on Col and shows that despite the literary dependence, the theology of Eph is distinctive in comparison with its source Col. The distinctiveness of Eph's theology consists in a critical modification of the stress which Col places on Christ's already accomplished victory over the cosmic powers (Co/ 2.15). In order to safeguard an authoritative reception of his modification of Col, the author of Eph presented his letter as the parallel letter of Col alluded to m Col 4.16. The literary dependence on Col is necessary both to modify its content and to present his own writing as its parallel letter
- …
