1,721,002 research outputs found
Impact of different forcing factors on N:P balance in a semi-enclosed bay: the Gulf of Trieste (North Adriatic Sea).
Climatic anomalies may create a long-lasting ecological phase shift by altering the reproduction of a foundation species
The resilience of ecological communities is often defined by one or a few species that have disproportionately important roles influencing many other species in the community. This is true for some areas of the Mediterranean Sea that are characterized by large brown fucoid algae in the genus Cystoseira that form dense underwater forests structurally similar to the giant kelps of the Pacific. While shorter than the giant kelp, Cystoseira form dense underwater stands, contributing to the three‐dimensional complexity of the seascape (Fig. 1). These canopy‐forming seaweeds play a crucial role in primary production and nutrient cycling of temperate coastal ecosystems from the Mediterranean Sea to the Atlantic Ocean (Mineur et al., 2015) and act as ‘ecosystem engineers', providing food, nursery, and shelter for a rich associated biota. Our study highlighted potential disruptive effects of winter hot spells on reproductive timing, recruitment, and adult survival that could severely affect the persistence of Cystoseira populations. Because extreme climate episodes are increasing in intensity and frequency, implementing coordinated initiatives connecting centers for climate alerts and algologists may shed light on how these phenomena impact population dynamics of Cystoseira species, and help current attempts to restore algal forests
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
