1,721,134 research outputs found
Anforderungen strukturiert mit Schablonen dokumentieren in PARIS
No full textDie präzise Spezifikation und Dokumentation von Anforderungen an Produkte und (Dienst-)Leistungen ist von zunehmender Bedeutung in der Softwareentwicklung, wie auch im Projektmanagement. Mit Hilfe der Schablonen aus PARIS (PAtterns for RequIrements Specification) können Anforderungen in standardisierter Form dokumentiert werden. Durch diese standardisierte Form wird die Qualität von Anforderungsdokumenten, Lastenheften, Leistungsbeschreibungen positiv beeinflusst. Dieser Aufsatz stellt Sprachschablonen für Stakeholderanforderungen und Qualitätsanforderungen vor. Außerdem wird gezeigt, wie mit Begründungen die Aussagenkraft und Nachvollziehbarkeit von Anforderungen erhöht wird. Es wird weiterhin eine Möglichkeit gezeigt, Anforderungen an komplexe, zusammengesetzte System zu formulieren
Requirements for a Decision Support System for Managing Complexity of Multidimensional IT Project Assessments in the Context of IT Portfolio Management
No full textMany companies evaluate their IT projects primarily according to financial decision criteria. The subsequent IT project selection for the IT portfolio is additionally influenced by political factors, various (partially unclear) standards, and questionable evaluation methods. There is a risk of misinvestment in IT projects that do not fit the company's strategy and accordingly lead to misallocation of resources. To solve this problem, this study will develop requirements for a decision support system that will enable a systematic, comprehensive, and transparent decision-making process for selecting suitable IT projects
HARMONY & PARIS – ein Tool zur präzisen Anforderungsdokumentation für die Projektarbeit
No full textDie präzise Definition von Anforderungen stellt eine Herausforderung in Projekten dar. Unklare Anforderungen können zu einer Vielzahl von Problemen führen, wie Budgetüberschreitungen, Verzögerungen im Zeitplan und mangelnde Stakeholder-Zufriedenheit. Deshalb muss sowohl der Umfang des Projekts (im Englischen mit Scope bezeichnet), als auch die Erwartungen der Stakeholder gemanagt werden. Gezeigt wird, wie eine präzise Anforderungsdokumentation zur Effizienzsteigerung in Projekten beitragen kann. Hierzu wird das Tool „HARMONY & EIFFEL” vorgestellt, welches auf den PARIS-Schablonen beruht und eine methodische Unterstützung bei der Formulierung von Anforderungen bietet. Hierbei wird detailliert auf die Funktionsweise, Verarbeitungslogik und die Benutzung der Lösung eingegangen
On the Use of Hybrid Development Approaches in Software and Systems Development:Construction and Test of the HELENA Survey
Get PDFA software process is the game plan to organize project teams and run projects. Yet, it still is a challenge to select the appropriate development approach for the respective context. A multitude of development approaches compete for the users’ favor, but there is no silver bullet serving all possible setups. Moreover, recent research as well as experience from practice shows companies utilizing different development approaches to assemble the best-fitting approach for the respective company: a more traditional process provides the basic framework to serve the organization, while project teams embody this framework with more agile (and/or lean) practices to keep their flexibility. The paper at hand provides insights into the HELENA study with which we aim to investigate the use of “Hybrid dEveLopmENt Approaches in software systems development”. We present the survey design and initial findings from the survey’s test runs. Furthermore, we outline the next steps towards the full survey
On the Use of Hybrid Development Approaches in Software and Systems Development:Construction and Test of the HELENA Survey
Get PDFA software process is the game plan to organize project teams and run projects. Yet, it still is a challenge to select the appropriate development approach for the respective context. A multitude of development approaches compete for the users’ favor, but there is no silver bullet serving all possible setups. Moreover, recent research as well as experience from practice shows companies utilizing different development approaches to assemble the best-fitting approach for the respective company: a more traditional process provides the basic framework to serve the organization, while project teams embody this framework with more agile (and/or lean) practices to keep their flexibility. The paper at hand provides insights into the HELENA study with which we aim to investigate the use of “Hybrid dEveLopmENt Approaches in software systems development”. We present the survey design and initial findings from the survey’s test runs. Furthermore, we outline the next steps towards the full survey
On the Use of Hybrid Development Approaches in Software and Systems Development:Construction and Test of the HELENA Survey
Get PDFA software process is the game plan to organize project teams and run projects. Yet, it still is a challenge to select the appropriate development approach for the respective context. A multitude of development approaches compete for the users’ favor, but there is no silver bullet serving all possible setups. Moreover, recent research as well as experience from practice shows companies utilizing different development approaches to assemble the best-fitting approach for the respective company: a more traditional process provides the basic framework to serve the organization, while project teams embody this framework with more agile (and/or lean) practices to keep their flexibility. The paper at hand provides insights into the HELENA study with which we aim to investigate the use of “Hybrid dEveLopmENt Approaches in software systems development”. We present the survey design and initial findings from the survey’s test runs. Furthermore, we outline the next steps towards the full survey
On the use of hybrid development approaches in software and systems development: construction and test of the HELENA survey
No full textA software process is the game plan to organize project teams and run projects. Yet, it still is a challenge to select the appropriate development approach for the respective context. A multitude of development approaches compete for the users' favor, but there is no silver bullet serving all possible setups. Moreover, recent research as well as experience from practice shows companies utilizing different development approaches to assemble the best-fitting approach for the respective company: a more traditional process provides the basic framework to serve the organization, while project teams embody this framework with more agile (and/or lean) practices to keep their flexibility. The paper at hand provides insights into the HELENA study with which we aim to investigate the use of “Hybrid dEveLopmENt Approaches in software systems development”. We present the survey design and initial findings from the survey's test runs. Furthermore, we outline the next steps towards the full survey
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
- …
