1,721,073 research outputs found

    Freshly isolated Lin-SP cells express FAPs surface markers but are capable of myogenic differentiation.

    No full text
    <p><b>A</b>: RT-PCR analysis of freshly isolated Lin- SP cells from wild type (WT) and <i>mdx<sup>5cv</sup></i> (MDX) muscle for myogenic markers (Pax7 and Myf5) and FAPs markers (PDGFRα and Sca1). Positive controls (PC) are sorted Sca1-positive cells for Sca1 and Lin- MP cells for Pax7, Myf5 and PDGFRα. Negative controls (NC) are sorted Sca1-negative cells for Sca1 and CD45-positive MP cells for Pax7, Myf5 and PDGFRα. <b>B, C</b>: FACS analysis of PDGFRα and Sca1 protein expression in Lin- SP cells (<b>B</b>) and Lin- MP cells (<b>C</b>) from wild type (WT) and <i>mdx<sup>5cv</sup></i> (MDX) muscle. Percentages of cells double positive (red) and double negative (green) for PDGFRα and Sca1 are shown. <b>D</b>: Confirmation by RT-PCR for PDGFRα expression in Lin- SP and Lin- MP cells sorted into PDGFRα-positive (Pα+) and PDGFRα-negative (Pα−) sub-fractions. <b>E</b>: <i>In vitro</i> myogenic differentiation of Lin- SP and MP cells sorted based on PDGFRα (Pα) expression. Cells were fixed after 14 days in culture and immunolabelled for α-actinin (green) to reveal myotubes. Cultures were counterstained with DAPI (blue) to visualize nuclei. Lin- MP Pα+ cells correspond to the previously characterized FAPs. Lin- MP Pα− cells are enriched in myogenic cells and also contain fibroblasts. Cultured wild type Lin- MP Pα− cells had 2,261 myotubes while cultured <i>mdx<sup>5cv</sup></i> Lin- MP Pα− cells had only 541 myotubes. Lin- SP Pα− cells did not survive in culture and are not shown. Scale bar  = 400 μm. <b>E</b>: Cultures of Lin- SP Pα− cells were double labeled with antibodies to α-actinin (green) and collagen I (red) to visualize myotubes and fibroblasts, respectively. Cultures of Lin- SP Pα− cells from dystrophic muscle (MDX) do not contain myotubes but give rise to fibroblasts. Scale bar  = 100 μm. <b>G</b>. Quantitative RT-PCR for Pax7 expression in Pdgfrα+ and Pdgfrα− Lin-SP cells, and Pdgfrα− Lin-MP cells. Data is presented as means +/− s.d. from 3 technical replicates.</p

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    FIGURES 5–9 in Monopelopia Fittkau, 1962, a newly recorded genus from Oriental China (Diptera Chironomidae) with a description of Monopelopia zhengi Lin sp. n.

    No full text
    FIGURES 5–9. Monopelopia zhengi Lin sp. n., holotype male. 5. Tibial spur of fore leg; 6. Tibial spurs of mid leg; 7. Tibial spurs of hind leg; 8. Hypopygium; 9. Drawing of hypopygium. Scale bar = 50 µm.Published as part of Duan, Xin, Chang, Tong, Jiao, Ke-Long, Wang, Xin-Hua & Lin, Xiao-Long, 2021, Monopelopia Fittkau, 1962, a newly recorded genus from Oriental China (Diptera Chironomidae) with a description of Monopelopia zhengi Lin sp. n., pp. 383-388 in Zootaxa 4980 (2) on page 386, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4980.2.9, http://zenodo.org/record/488928

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore