1,720,979 research outputs found
Vocabulary of the Chinese Translation of the Book Entitled “Modogiwa no Totto-chan”－Discussion from Chapter 1 to Chapter 10
No full text本研究主要是想究明銷售?破百萬以上的《??????????》（黑?徹子著1981?）中文譯本中詞彙的使用情形，藉以作為實踐比較語彙研究（田島毓堂1995）之一環。文中將報告調查過程、並試以與該日文原文相互對照的方式，從??上的觀點揭示並探討第一章到第十章的詞彙特徵。 調查、探討時所使用的中文譯本主要是以「銷售情形」與「取得容?性」作為考?，選定《窗口邊的豆豆》（世茂出版1986?）。就目前的調查結果發現：該中譯本中符號的使用情形和日語原文相差?多，但就每章每一單詞之平均使用?而言，中譯本比日語原文?的低。筆者認為這並非偶然，可能是和日語帶有「膠著語」特性有關，因為“?????助詞的多用，才浮現出此一??上的差?。 當然，有關本研究?實質的分析報告還待日後的調查完成後完整提出。透過語言?解?語言間之文化?同是比較語彙研究的宗旨。本稿?僅證實?透過《??????????》該作品進?比較語彙研究之可能性，同時也為該研究奠下根基。就此點而言意義深遠。The purpose of this study is to discuss the use of vocabulary in the Chinese translation of the book entitled “Modogiwa no Totto-chan” (written by Kuroyanagi, Tetsuko in 1981) with a record-breaking sale of one million copies, in hopes of conducting the Comparative Study of Vocabulary (田島毓堂, 1995.) The study attempts to reveal and discuss the characteristics of the vocabulary from Chapter 1 to Chapter 10 of the book based on the number of vocabulary, by comparing the Chinese translation version with the Japanese source text. The book entitled “窗口邊的豆豆” (世茂出版,1986) has been selected for research and discussion on the basis of “book sale conditions” and “accessibility.” The current research findings suggest that the use of symbols in the Chinese translation version is not significantly different from theJapanese source text, but the average rate of word use for each chapter is lower for the Chinese translation version than that for the Japanese source text. I believe that such findings are not occasional, and are possibly related to the “agglutinative language” inherent in the Japanese language, because this difference in the number of vocabulary may be caused by the overuse of the auxiliary word“????.? A more substantial analysis report of this research will be submitted after subsequent studies have been completed. The objective of the Comparative Study of Vocabulary is to understand the differences and similarity of cultures inherent in different languages, from a discussion of languages. This article confirms the possibility of conducting the Comparative Study of Vocabulary of the book entitled “Modogiwa no Totto-chan” and sets a foundation for this research, which is greatly meaningful
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
The Research and Development of JLPT Vocabulary Lists
No full text第二外語日語考科語彙表之內容包括「基礎語彙」與「進階語彙」，為「大學入學考試中心九十五學年度第二外語日語考科試題研發計畫」執行成果之一部分。本文除了報告語彙表的編製背景、現況之外，並對語彙的蒐集、篩選以及與其他語彙表之比對所呈現出的特性與意義加以描述。
語彙表特性的掌握是透過具有「基本語彙」性格參考指標的《?立?語研究所報告117 教育基本語彙?基本的研究》（2001年，明治書院）與《?立?語研究所報告78 日本語教育????基本語彙調?》(1984年，秀英出版)的比對結果。前者是以日本人為對象所編製的教育用基本語彙；後者則是為母語非日語之外國人日語教育所作的基本語彙表。經比對結果得知：目前所完成的第二外語日語考科語彙表與這兩份語彙表分別有88%、82%的重覆率，這代表著第二外語日語考科語彙表?有極濃厚的「基本語彙」性格。
雖然目前所完成的第二外語日語考科的語彙表仍有許多值得檢討、改進之處，但其作成的本身為台灣的日語教育劃下了歷史性的里程碑，意義深遠。The content of JLPT (Japanese Language Proficiency Test) Vocabulary List includes Basic Level Vocabularies and Advance Level Vocabularies. The Vocabulary List is part of the JLPT Test Content Specification. It is the result of 2005 Test Content Specification R&D project conducted by Japan Educational Exchanges and Services. The background and condition of the Vocabulary Lists will be described in the research report. Furthermore, the collection and evaluation of vocabularies in the Vocabulary Lists are conducted. The comparison between JLPT Vocabulary Lists and other published vocabulary lists is also completed. A detailed description of characteristic and significance of these efforts will be presented in the report.
The key features of vocabulary are identified via a through study and comparison of two reports, The National Institute for Japanese Language Report 117 – “Study of Vocabulary List of Basic Japanese Vocabulary” (教育基本語彙?基本的研究) published by Meiji Shoin (明治書院) in 2001, and Report 78 – “A Study of Fundamental Vocabulary for Japanese Language Teaching” (日本語教育????基本語彙調?) published by Shuei Shuppan (秀英出版) in 1984. Report 117 is the basic vocabulary list designed for Japanese education, and Report 78 is the basic vocabulary list for foreigners learning Japanese as second language. After thorough study and explicit comparison, the results show that The JLPT Vocabulary List has 88% and 82% similarity with Report 117 and 78 Vocabulary Lists. The characteristic of “basic vocabulary” can be easily found in JLPT Vocabulary Lists.
Although there are still lots of issues yet to be discussed and examined in JLPT Vocabulary Lists, it has shown its significance on the study of Japanese learning and instruction in Taiwan
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
