219,307 research outputs found
Tz-Lin Hsu Piano Recital Program Notes
No full textThis is the Program Notes of Tz-Lin Hsu\ue2s piano recital held on May 20th, 2020. The recital program includes Johann Sebastian Bach\ue2s The Well-Tempered Clavier, Book 1, Prelude and Fugue No. 17 in A-flat Major, BWV 862; Ludwig van Beethoven\ue2s Sonata No. 7 in D Major, Op. 10, No. 3, Jakob Ludwig Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy\ue2s Fantasy in F-sharp minor, Op. 28; and Ignacy Jan Paderewski\ue2s Th\uc3\ua8me vari\uc3\ua8 in A Major, Op. 16, No. 3. The program notes will briefly introduce these four composers\ue2 lives, their compositional backgrounds, and the structure of each work, including the tonal organization and thematic materials
Epsteinius Lin, Braby & Hsu 2020, gen. nov.
No full textEpsteinius Lin, Braby & Hsu, gen. nov. (Figs 1–4, 11, 13, 14, 17, 29, 30, 36, 37, 45, 46) Type species. Epsteinius translucidus Lin, sp. nov. (here designated). Diagnosis. Epsteinius differs from Microleon (Figs 5–9, 12, 15, 16, 18, 34, 35, 43, 44; Solovyev, 2008; Sasaki, 2016; Sohn et al., 2018) by the following characters: (1) adults are smaller in size—male forewing length of Epsteinius is 5.3–5.5 mm compared with 6.3–7.9 mm for that of Microleon; (2) in Epsteinius the hindwing is narrower with the termen rounded, whereas in Microleon it is broader with the termen distinctly angular; (3) the labial palpus of Epsteinius is shorter (approx. 2.0–2.5 times the diameter of the eye) than that of Microleon (approx. 3 times the diameter of the eye); (4) in Epsteinius the upperside of the forewing has the inner half dark brown with a purple iridescent suffusion, whereas in Microleon there are usually two large irregular orange patches, one at base and the other in the median area of dorsum, and it lacks the purple suffusion; (5) in Epsteinius the scale fringe of the hindwing is grey, whereas in Microleon it is conspicuously black at the tornus. In addition, the male genitalia of Epsteinius (Figs 13, 14) differs from that of Microleon (Figs 15, 16) in many characters, including the form of the gnathos which has a sharply down curved tip, the valva which has two long processes along the dorsal margin, and the phallus which is shorter and basally enlarged and rounded with two conspicuous cornuti. In contrast, the genitalia of Microleon has the gnathos with a T-shaped end, no process along the dorsal margin of the valva, and a relatively straight phallus without cornuti. The female genitalia of Epsteinius (Fig. 17) differs from Microleon (Fig. 18) in having a short and wide ductus bursae, and an ovate corpus bursae containing two signa each with a row of flat complex teeth. In Microleon, the ductus bursae is long and coiled, and the corpus bursae is ovate, containing only one signum with a set of sharp complex processes over its surface. Although the early instar larvae of Epsteinius (Figs 24, 25) and Microleon spp. (Figs 19, 20) are very similar, they diverge considerably in color pattern and shape in the final instar larvae, as follows: (1) in Epsteinius (Figs 26, 27, 31, 32) the shape of the body is elliptical, whereas in Microleon spp. (Figs 21, 22) it is narrower with a humped dorsal surface; (2) in Epsteinius there is usually an indistinct brown lateral patch (which varies among individuals), whereas in Microleon spp. there is a distinct red subdorsal patch; (3) in Epsteinius the body is semi-translucent, whereas in Microleon spp. it is opaque; (4) in Epsteinius the spine-bearing protuberances are similar to those of its early instars, whereas in Microleon spp. the protuberances in the final instar diminish in size compared with its early instars. Etymology. The generic name is named in honor of Marc E. Epstein for his enormous and longstanding contribution to the study of limacodid moths.Published as part of Lin, Yu-Chi, Braby, M. F. & Hsu, Yu-Feng, 2020, A new genus and species of slug caterpillar (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) from Taiwan, pp. 374-382 in Zootaxa 4809 (2) on page 376, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4809.2.8, http://zenodo.org/record/393424
Caltoris ranrunna Hsu & Xue & Lin & Huang 2019, stat. rev.
No full textCaltoris ranrunna (Sonan, 1936), stat. rev. (Figs. 2–5, 10, 12, 14, 16–17) Parnara ranrunna Sonan, 1936: 215. (Holotype in TARI, examined) Caltoris cahira austeni; Evans (not Moore, 1883) 1949: 452; Shirôzu 1960: 481; Hamano 1986: 263. pl. 54; Chiba et al. 1992: 132 (checklist). Caltoris ranrunna; Shirôzu 1960: 461 (checklist); Hamano 1986: 463 (index); Chiba et al. 1992: 132 (checklist). Specimens examined. TAIWAN: TAIPEI CITY: 1♂, Xiangshan, 4. VIII. 1987 (Coll. Y. F. Hsu); 2♂, Wenshan, Gongguan Campus, NTNU, 15. VII. 2005, reared from Bambusa sp., emgd. 26. VII. 2005, 05G15 (Coll. L. H. Wang). XINBEI CITY [= NEW TAIPEI CITY / TAIPEI Co.]: 1♂, 1♀, Wulai, 22. VIII. 1985 (Coll. Y. F. Hsu); 1♂, same locality, 1. III. 1987 (Coll. Y. F. Hsu); 1♀, Miantianshan, 2. VII. 1987 (Coll. Y. F. Hsu); 1♂, Ruifang, Nanya, 26. IV. 2003, reared from Arundo sp., emgd. 28. V. 2003, HSU 03 E35 (Coll. H. C. Huang). TAOYUAN CITY [= TAOYUAN Co.]: 2♂, 1♀, Fuxing, Baling, 500m, 29. V. 2002 (Coll. Y. F Hsu); 1♂, Xuanyuan, 6. VIII. 1987 (Coll. Y. F. Hsu); 1♀, same locality, 27. II. 1988 (Coll. Y. F. Hsu). TAIZHONG CITY [= TAICHUNG CITY / TAICHUNG Co.]: 1♂, Qingshui, 6. VIII. 2004 (Coll. D. C. Chen). YUNLIN Co.: 2♀, Douliu, Linnei, Tudigongkengxi, 9. I. 2004, reared from Arundo formosana, emgd. 18. III. 2004, HSU 04 A1 (Coll. Y. F. Hsu). JIAYI [= CHIAYI] Co.: 1♀, Fanlu, Longmei, 11. XI. 2004 (Coll. Y. F. Hsu). TAINAN CITY [= TAINAN Co.]: 1♀, Guantian, Wushantou, 40m, 24. X. 2009 (Coll. Y. F. Hsu); 1shaBaihe, Guanziling, 400m, 17. IX. 2002 (Coll. Y. F. Hsu); 1♀, Xinhua, 20. I. 2007 (Coll. Y. F. Hsu). KAOHSIUNG CITY [= KAOHSIUNG Co.]: 1♀, Tianliao, Yueshijie, 80m, 3. XII. 2011 (Coll. Y. F. Hsu). PINGDONG [= PINGTUNG] Co.: 1♂, 1♀, Chunri, Dahanshan, 1000m, 4. I. 2003, reared from Arundo formosana, emgd. 18/ 20. II. 2003, 03A8 (Coll. Y. F. Hsu). YILAN Co.: 1♀, Nanshan, 24. VI. 1988 (Coll. Y. F. Hsu). TAIDONG [= TAITUNG] Co.: 1♂, Luyexi, 3. I. 1988 (Coll. Y. F. Hsu). Diagnosis. Caltoris ranrunna (Figs. 2–5) is similar to Caltoris cahira (Moore, 1877) (Figs. 6–9) in wing pattern and genitalia. Both taxa share unmarked hindwing undersides and caudal end of valva deeply divided (Evans, 1949) (Figs. 2–9, 12–13). The following characteristics may be used to distinguish these two taxa: 1) The outer cilia of the wing fringe is white or creamy white in cahira, but creamy yellow in ranrunna (Fig. 11). 2) Dorsal margin of valva is concave in cahira (Fig. 13, see also Eliot, 1992, Fig. 434), but straight or convex in ranrunna (Fig. 12, see also Shirozu, 1960, p. 430, Fig. 477). 3) Dorsal surface of hump at caudal end of tegumen is depressed dorsad in cahira (Fig. 13, see also Eliot, 1992, Fig. 434), whereas it is swollen in ranrunna (Fig. 12). 4) Medial part of lamella postvaginalis is heavily sclerotized, with caudal end protruding into a tapering angle in cahira (Fig. 15), whereas it is truncated in ranrunna (Fig. 14). Larval hostplants. The hostplants for larvae are well known for C. ranrunna, including various kinds of bamboos and a bunch grass called Arundo formosana (all Poaceae) (Hsu & Wang, 2004; Lu & Chen, 2014). Immature biology. Immatures of C. ranrunna are known, with morphology and habits of all stages illustrated in Uchida (1991) and Lu & Chen (2014). No obvious distinction may be recognized between larva of C. ranrunna and C. cahira, except that the ground color of head capsule of grown-up larva may be paler in C. ranrunna than in C. cahira (Fig. 16–19)Published as part of Hsu, Yu-Feng, Xue, Guo-Xi, Lin, Rung-Juen & Huang, Li, 2019, Resurrection of Caltoris ranrunna (Sonan) from synonymy as a skipper endemic to Taiwan based on COI barcode and morphology in Zootaxa 4555 (1), DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4555.1.4, http://zenodo.org/record/262413
[[alternative]]Study on genetic structure of Sibataniozephyrus kuafui Hsu & Lin and phylogenetic relationship among Sibataniozephyrus species
No full text[[abstract]]Sibataniozephyrus kuafui was a recently described lycaenid butterfly ( Hsu & Lin，1994 )，which utilites Fagus hayatae as the sole larval host. The first aim of the research is to investigate the population structure of this rare butterfly in Taiwan.
The second issue to be explored here is the possibility of presence of coevolutionary pattern as Sibataniozephyrus is the only lycaenid genus that is specialized on the beech trees, with each described species use a different beech species as its larval host.
A seguence of 405 bp of COI gene was analyzed to investigate the genetic differentiations of S. kuafui. It turned out the population at Tongshan, Ilan is well differentiated from that of the N. Chatienshan (Fst=0.51),with the former possessing one unique haplotype and the latter two. After studying a sequence of 1068 bp of COI, tRNA and COII gene, it was found that S. kuafui shares a synapomorphy with S. fujisanus by a deletion of an amino acid code AAT in compared with the Sibataniozephyrus taxa in the Asiatic mainland. The phylogenetic pattern derived from the research did not support the coevolution model between Sibataniozephyrus lycaenids and their hosts. Alternatively, the data suggests after gaining the ability of using beech as larval host, Sibataniozephyrus horizontally shifted larval host usage, and speciated by the other evolutionary causes, independent of the diversification of the beeches.
Daidalotarsonemus notoschism Lin & Liu 1994
No full text<i>Daidalotarsonemus notoschism</i> Lin & Liu, 1994 <p> <i>Daidalotarsonemus notoschism</i> Lin & Liu, 1994: 62; Lin & Zhang, 2002: 61.</p> <p> <b>Type material deposition:</b> holotype ♀ deposited at FAAS.</p> <p> <b>Locality:</b> Shanghang County, Fujian Province, China.</p> <p> <b>Remarks:</b> <i>D. notoschism</i> is considered a <i>species inquirenda</i> due to dubious morphology presented on drawings in the original paper, which do not present key characters for <i>Daidalotarsonemus</i> e.g. ornamentation on dorsal shields and modified posterior dorsal setae.</p>Published as part of <i>Rezende, José Marcos, Bauchan, Gary, Lin, Jian-Zhen, Ochoa, Ronald & Lofego, Antonio Carlos, 2024, Review of the genus Daidalotarsonemus De Leon (Acari: Prostigmata: Tarsonemidae), pp. 1-170 in Zootaxa 5426 (1)</i> on page 97, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5426.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10840715">http://zenodo.org/record/10840715</a>
Protanilla jongi Hsu, Hsu, Hsiao & Lin, 2017, sp. nov.
No full textProtanilla jongi sp. nov. Figs. 1–4. Type material. Holotype ♀ (worker): TAIWAN, Nantou, Fenghuang Education Area, (23°43.763'N, 120°47.313'E), alt. 840 m, by hand-collecting, 0 5. III. 2016, Po-Cheng Hsu leg. (NMNS). Paratypes: 1 ♀ (worker): same location as the holotype, by Winkler extraction method, 28.XI.2015, Po-Wei Hsu leg.; 8 ♀ (worker), 1 ♀ (queen): same data as the holotype (1 worker at NTU; 2 workers and queen at NCUE; 2 workers at KUM; 2 workers at BMNH; 2 workers at FMNH) Etymology. The new species is named after Dr. Jaw-Jinn Jong, an entomologist from Taiwan. Measurements. Holotype worker: HL 0.80, HW 0.69, CI 86, SL 0.74, SI 107, ML 0.47, PW 0.51, WL 1.24, PNL 0.37, PNH 0.45, PNW 0.35, PPNL 0.42, PPNH 0.38, PPNW 0.37; Paratype workers (n=9): HL 0.77–0.84, HW 0.66–0.75, CI 85–89, SL 0.67–0.75, SI 97–107, ML 0.43–0.50, PW 0.43–0.54, WL 1.17–1.33, PNL 0.31– 0.39, PNH 0.43–0.49, PNW 0.31–0.37, PPNL 0.37–0.44, PPNH 0.35–0.41, PPNW 0.36–0.39; Paratype queen: HL 0.73, HW 0.62, CI 85, SL 0.68, SI 110, ML 0.37, PW 0.58, WL 1.44, PNL 0.37, PNH 0.52, PNW 0.39, PPNL 0.46, PPNH 0.44, PPNW 0.44. Description. Holotype worker: Body brownish-yellow. In full-face view, head longer than wide, slightly narrow anteriorly; posterior margin straight; lateral margins convex. Eyes absent. Clypeus in full-face view with a bell-shaped outline; anterior margin concave, without depressed middle strip. Mandibles long and triangular; masticatory margin slightly crenulate, with approximately 20 peg-like teeth; apical 1/3 denticulate and without peg-like teeth. A longitudinal groove running along the dorsolateral margin of mandible, traversing the width to inner margin at 1/3 the length to apex, just before the preapical series of denticles. A series of long stout hairs on masticatory margin of mandibular apical portion, with the foremost one stoutest. In lateral view, mandible strongly down-curved apically, with a small blunt denticle at inner ventral face, 1/3 the length to base. Antennae 12- segmented; scape long, slightly exceeding posterior margin of head; segments 2–3 somewhat conical and longer than wide; segments 4–11 nearly as long as wide; terminal segment twice as long as wide. Mesosoma slender. Pronotum in dorsal view round, twice as broad as mesonotum, in lateral view with a convex dorsal outline. Promesonotal groove distinct dorsally and laterally. Mesonotum thin, in dorsal view narrow posteriorly, in lateral view with a straight dorsal outline. Metanotal groove depressed with several short longitudinal notches. Propodeum in dorsal view oval, with posterior half round, in lateral view with a convex dorsal outline and propodeal spiracle in the middle lower part above bulla of metapleural gland. Petiolar node in dorsal view round, in lateral view straight anteriorly and slightly convex dorsally, forming a round posterodorsal corner and a clearly differentiated posterior face sloping down to the articulation with postpetiole; anterolateral part just above the anterior short peduncle forming a small projection. Subpetiolar sternite in lateral view approximately 1/4 as high as petiole height, narrow posteriorly, with a lobe-like subpetiolar process anteroventrally. A circular transparent fenenstra in the center of that process. Presclerites of postpetiole constricted to helcium, attached to almost the center of the anterior face of postpetiole at approximately 45 degrees. Postpetiole broadly attached to abdominal segment IV, without any free posterior face above the articulation with abdominal segment IV. Postpetiole in dorsal view with bell-shaped to trapezoidal outline, broad posteriorly, in lateral view with a round anterior face and a slightly convex dorsal outline above the articulation with petiole; anteroventral corner of postpetiolar poststernite forming a right angle. Postsclerites of postpetiole and presclerites of abdominal segment IV, when the articulation is outstretched, forming a continuously outline. Presclerites of abdominal segment IV coarsely sculptured; pretergite narrow; presternite well-developed and bulging. An inconspicuous narrow girdling constriction between pre- and postsclerites of abdominal segment IV. In dorsal view, anterior margin of posttergite of abdominal segment IV slightly concave. In lateral view, dorsal and ventral margins of postsclerites of abdominal segment IV forming a continuous outline which is slightly convex, and narrow anteriorly, but never forming a deep and narrow notch between the posttergite and poststernite at the anterior margin. Sting long, exceeding half the length of gaster. Paratye female (queen): Body brown, darker than that of worker. In full-face view, head slightly longer than wide; sides convex; posterior margin straight. Compound eyes large, located in the center of the side of head. Ocelli present. Clypeus same shape as in workers. Mandibles similar to worker, slightly more robust and less down-curved in lateral view. Antennae similar to worker. Mesosoma well developed. Pronotum in dorsal view approximately as long as scutum, in lateral view with a convex dorsal outline. Scutum in dorsal view shieldshaped, somewhat triangular, in lateral view with a flat dorsal outline. Scutellum in dorsal view small, half the length of scutum, in lateral view with a convex dorsal outline. Propodeum in dorsal view somewhat trapezoidal, with posterior face convex, in lateral view with a round dorsal outline. Propodeal spiracle large, at middle lower part above bulla of metapleural gland, which is considerably more developed than that of workers. Petiole and postpetiole in both dorsal and profile view same shape as in workers, but postpetiole in lateral view with a more convex dorsal outline and a more produced anteroventral corner. Presternite of abdominal segment IV less prominent than those of workers. Abdominal segment VI broadly attached to postpetiole, in dorsal view anterior margin concave. Diagnosis. Protanilla jongi sp. nov. can be easily distinguished from other Protanilla species by the combination of the following characters: mandibles with a small blunt denticle at the ventral margin, postpetiolar sternite with a right-angled anteroventral corner in lateral view, postpetiole broadly attached to abdominal segment IV and with a bell-shaped outline in dorsal view. Remarks. Some variation in the shape of the petiole and postpetiole were observed among the holotype and paratype workers: anterior face of the petiole (above the short peduncle) sometimes slightly concave; the angular anteroventral corner of postpetiolar sternite sometimes slightly produced.Published as part of Hsu, Po-Wei, Hsu, Feng-Chuan, Hsiao, Yun & Lin, Chung-Chi, 2017, Taxonomic notes on the genus Protanilla (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Leptanillinae) from Taiwan, pp. 117-130 in Zootaxa 4268 (1) on pages 119-123, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4268.1.7, http://zenodo.org/record/57994
Replication data for "Urbanization Policy and Economic Development: A Quantitative Analysis of China’s Differential Hukou Reforms"
No full textThe codes to replicate the results in "Urbanization Policy and Economic Development: A Quantitative Analysis of China’s Differential Hukou Reforms" by Wen-Tai Hsu and Lin M
Li han lin quan ji: si shi er juan, mu lu si juan, nian pu. v.1
No full text[李白].綫裝, 1函.框20.3x14.8公分, 9行18字, 小字雙行同. 白口, 左右雙邊, 單白魚尾. 版心中鐫"李集"及卷次, 下鐫葉次.書根印有"李翰林集"前有王樨登序, 李陽冰《李翰林詩序》, 樂史《別集序》, 宋敏求後序, 曾鞏後序, 毛漸題跋.書中樂史《別集序》載"李翰林歌詩李陽冰纂為草堂集十卷史又別收歌詩十卷與草堂集互有得失因校勘排為二十卷號曰李翰林集"With: 李翰林年譜 / 薛仲邕編 ; 舊唐書列傳 ; 新唐書列傳 ; 李翰林墓誌銘 / 李華 ; 碣記 / 劉全 ; 碑陰記 / 蘇軾.Xian zhuang, 1 han.Kuang 20.3 x 14.8 gong fen, 9 hang 18 zi, xiao zi shuang hang tong. Bai kou, zuo you shuang bian, dan bai yu wei. Ban xin zhong juan "Li ji"ji juan ci, xia juan ye ci.Shu gen yin you "Li han lin ji"Qian you Wang Xideng xu, Li Yangbing "Li han lin shi xu", Yue Shi "Bie ji xu", Song Minqiu hou xu, Zeng Gong hou xu, Mao Jian ti ba.Shu zhong Yue Shi "Bie ji xu" zai "Li han lin ge shi Li Yangbing zuan wei Cao tang ji shi juan shi you bie shou ge shi shi juan yu Cao tang ji hu you de shi yin jiao kan pai wei er shi juan hao yue Li han lin ji"[Li Bai].With: Li han lin nian pu / Xue Zhongyong bian ; Jiu Tang shu lie zhuan ; Xin Tang shu lie zhuan ; Li han lin mu zhi ming / Li Hua ; Jie ji / Liu Quan ; Bei yin ji / Su Shi
Spiranthes nivea var. nivea T. P. Lin & W. M. Lin 2011
No full textSpiranthes nivea T.P. Lin & W.M. Lin (2011: 320) var. nivea — Fig. 4. Type:— TAIWAN. Pingtung: Tahanshan, 20 May 2009, Y.F. Wang s.n. (holotype: TAI 270634!). Synonym:— Spiranthes suishaensis auct. non (Hayata 1916: 86) Schlechter (1919: 161): Lin (2016: 117). Morphological descriptions and illustrations: —See Lin & Lin (2011: 320; f. 5), Surveswaran et al. (2017: 125; f. 4), Hsu & Chung (2016: 188), as Spiranthes suishaensis, and Lin (2019: 266; f. 117; pl. 13). Distribution and ecology: —The typical variety species is only recorded from the type locality, Tahanshan (Mt. Tahan) in southern Taiwan. It grows on semi-open roadside slopes around 1400–1600 m elev. and flowers from March to April. Additional specimens examined: — TAIWAN. Pingtung Co.: Mt. Tahan, 13 March 2013, T.-C. Hsu 6342 (TAIF!); Tahanshan, 9 April 2013, S.-S. Lin s.n. (TAI!). Taxonomic remarks: — Spiranthes nivea is most similar to S. hongkongensis, but it differs in having nearly glabrous labellum disc, smaller glabrous basal labellum callosities, and sparsely pubescent glabrous rachis, ovaries, and sepals.Published as part of Suetsugu, Kenji & Hsu, Tian-Chuan, 2023, Taxonomic revision of the genus Spiranthes (Orchidaceae) in Taiwan, pp. 1-10 in Phytotaxa 578 (1) on page 5, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.578.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/751762
Daidalotarsonemus biovatus Lin & Liu 1995
No full text<i>Daidalotarsonemus biovatus</i> Lin & Liu, 1995 <p>(Figs. 17 A–E)</p> <p> <i>Daidalotarsonemus biovatus</i> Lin & Liu, 1995: 309; Lin & Zhang, 2002: 57.</p> <p>(Information translated and modified from Lin & Liu, 1995).</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis. Female:</b> <i>Gnathosoma</i>: Palpal length about 1/4 length of gnathosoma. <i>Dorsum</i>: Reticulate ornamentation on prodorsum. Tergite C with three distinct transverse rows of cells, grouped between setae <i>c1</i>, and reticulate pattern laterally. Tergite D smooth. Setae <i>v1</i>, <i>sc2</i>, <i>c1</i>, <i>c2</i> and <i>h</i> unmodified in shape. Setae <i>v1</i> as long as <i>sc2</i> (~ 28). Setae <i>c1</i> and <i>h</i> similar in length (~ 16), both shorter than <i>c2</i> (~ 20). Setae <i>c1</i> inserted near midlength of tergite C. Setae <i>d</i>, <i>e</i> and <i>f</i> leaf-shaped. Setae <i>d</i> and <i>f</i> identical in shape (linear with two lateral veins), width (~ 4) but different in length (~ 35 and ~ 45, respectively). Setae <i>e</i> elliptical in shape, shorter than <i>d</i> and <i>f</i>, but longer than <i>h</i> (~ 20). Setae <i>f</i> ~15 distant from each other, on rounded tubercles. <i>Venter</i>: Tegula truncate, slightly arched posteriorly. All apodemes distinct. Apodemes 2 not fused to prosternal apodeme. Poststernal apodeme rudimentary bifurcation. <i>Legs</i>: sensory cluster of tibiotarsus I complete. Seta <i>tc”</i> of tarsus II slender and serrate. <b>Male & larva:</b> unknown.</p> <p> <b>Type material deposition:</b> holotype ♀ and three paratypes ♀ deposited at FAAS.</p> <p> <b>Locality:</b> 25°11′N 116°45′E, Shanghang County, Fujian Province, China; 25°45′N 116°45′E, Lianchen County, Fujian Province, China; 27°44′N 118°1′E, Wuyi Mountain, Fujian Province, China (Lin & Liu 1995).</p>Published as part of <i>Rezende, José Marcos, Bauchan, Gary, Lin, Jian-Zhen, Ochoa, Ronald & Lofego, Antonio Carlos, 2024, Review of the genus Daidalotarsonemus De Leon (Acari: Prostigmata: Tarsonemidae), pp. 1-170 in Zootaxa 5426 (1)</i> on pages 24-28, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5426.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10840715">http://zenodo.org/record/10840715</a>
- …
