191,334 research outputs found
Fritzolenellus Lieberman 1998
No full textGenus <i>Fritzolenellus</i> Lieberman, 1998 <p> <b>Type species.</b> <i>Olenellus truemani</i> Walcott, 1913.</p>Published as part of <i>Gapp, I. Wesley & Lieberman, Bruce S., 2014, New olenelloid trilobites from the Northwest Territories, Canada, pp. 479-498 in Zootaxa 3866 (4)</i> on page 494, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3866.4.2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/249698">http://zenodo.org/record/249698</a>
The Lieberman–Brian Inclusion Rating Scale for Physical Education
No full text Children with disabilities have mixed feelings about their inclusion experiences. The purpose of this study was to explore the validity and reliability of results from the Lieberman-Brian Inclusion Rating Scale for Physical Education. Experts in adapted physical education ( n = 10) established content and face validity (mean = 4.68 ± 0.56) on a five-point scale through three rounds of evaluation through the Delphi method. Next, elementary physical education teachers ( n = 15) and two independent raters established test–retest reliability ( r = 0.87, p < 0.001; intra-class correlations (ICC) = 0.93, p < 0.001) and inter-rater reliability ( r = 0.69, p < 0.001; ICC = 0.82, p < 0.001) respectively. Physical education teachers among others can use this valid and reliable scale to determine the extent to which teachers attempt to make an environment inclusive. Practical uses for this instrument are program evaluation, intervention research, and as a teaching tool. </jats:p
Inside of Florida Steel Plant for Lieberman-Harrison Advertising, P
No full textA view inside a Florida Steel Corporation Plant circa 1973 for the Lieberman-Harrison Advertising firm.https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/gandy_commercial/8856/thumbnail.jp
Saul Lieberman. — Texts and Studies, 1974
No full textVajda Georges. Saul Lieberman. — Texts and Studies, 1974. In: Revue des études juives, tome 134, n°1-2, janvier-juin 1975. p. 203
Joseph I. Lieberman. — Child Support in America
No full textPerry Evelyn. Joseph I. Lieberman. — Child Support in America. In: Revue Française d'Etudes Américaines, N°33, juillet 1987. Visions des Etats-Unis. p. 461
Bristolia colberti Gapp & Lieberman, 2014, sp. nov.
No full textBristolia colberti sp. nov. Fig. 2.4 Type material. Holotype KUMIP 355552. Paratypes KUMIP 355553 and PWNHC 2013.23.35– 37. Etymology. In honour of actor and comedian Stephen T. Colbert. Diagnosis. Width of interocular area approximately 0.5 times the width (tr.) of ocular lobe; L 2 and L 3 do not merge abaxially; prominent ocular furrow; width of the ocular lobe is equal to the width of the extraocular area abaxial to L 2. Description. Anterior cephalic border directly anterior of ocular lobes directed posteriorly 5-10 degrees, length (sag.) approximately 0.6 times length LO; anterior border furrow present; LA contacts anterior border furrow; length (sag.) of LA is approximately the combined length (sag.) of LO, LI, and L 2; posterior half of LA constricts to width 0.6 times that of widest part of LA; furrow present where ocular lobes contact LA; ocular furrow present; ocular lobes wide, maximum width approximately equals width (tr.) extraocular area, extending posteriorly to L 1; width of interocular area measured opposite L 1 approximately 0.5 times the width (tr.) of ocular lobe; S 3 convex anteriorly, conjoined adaxially; abaxial margins of L 3 extend further adaxially than L 2; L 2 and L 3 do not merge abaxially; S 2 convex anteriorly, conjoined adaxially; L 1 straight, not conjoined adaxially; abaxial margins of L 1 directly anterior of LO; SO slightly convex posteriorly, not conjoined adaxially; posterior border of LO slightly convex posteriorly; posterior border between LO and intergenal angle straight, parallel to a transverse line; posterior border between genal angle and intergenal angle is deflected anteriorly approximately 70 degrees at intergenal angle; intergenal angle developed midway between genal angle and ocular lobe; intergenal swelling present; genal angle developed adaxial of anterior margin of ocular lobe; genal spines deflected posteriorly at approximately 45 degrees with an average width equal to the length (sag.) of LO. Discussion. This species is assigned to the genus Bristolia based on a number of characters that it shares with other species within the genus. These include: a short (sag.) anterior cephalic border, prominently separated from the extraocular area by a furrow; the frontal lobe contacts the anterior border furrow; the ocular lobe contacts LA at the postero-lateral border; faint depression across entire region where ocular lobe hits frontal lobe (present in most Bristolia except for B. anteros Palmer in Palmer & Halley, 1979 and B. sp. [Fritz 1972]); S 3 is the same depth laterally as adaxially; lateral margins of L 2 are constricted compared to the rest of the glabella; posterior edge of ocular lobe opposite adaxial part of margin of L 1; long genal spines are present; a faint intergenal ridge is observed; extraocular area is flattened; and as with other species of Bristolia, this specimen has a prominent intergenal angle flexing anteriorly and genal spines that are positioned far anteriorly on the cephalon. Unlike other species of Bristolia, this species has a prominent ocular furrow. Also the ratio of the width (sag.) of L 3 to L 2 is greater than in other species and the lateral furrows of LO and L 1 are not as constricted anteriorly. Lastly, the width of the ocular lobe (measured perpendicular to the lobe axis at its midpoint) is equal to the width of the extraocular area abaxial to L 2, whereas other species have narrower ocular lobes and wider ocular areas (sag.). This species generally resembles the poorly preserved (known from a partial cephalon) Laudonia ? sp. 1 Fritz, 1972, p. 27, pl. 9, fig. 21, treated as Bristolia sp. in Lieberman 1999, and also from the Sekwi Formation. For instance, they both have a prominent intergenal angle flexing anteriorly and genal spines that are positioned far anteriorly on the cephalon. However, they do differ in several features as well, primarily involving the shape and position of the ocular lobes, and are thus treated as distinct. In particular, in B. colberti: the posterior tips of the ocular lobes extend back to LO instead of L 1; a line from the anterior to the posterior tips of the ocular lobe parallels a sagittal line, instead of forming a 20-30 degree angle relative to a sagittal line; and the interocular area and LA are less prominently inflated. In southwestern Laurentia, species of Bristolia typically occur high up in the Dyeran stage (Webster 2011 a, 2011 b; Webster et al. 2011). However, in northwestern Laurentia this genus occurs relatively lower down in the stage, especially relative to the position of other olenelloid genera. Occurrence. Olenellus zone or Waucoban Series, Dyeran stage, sensu Webster (2011 a, b) and Webster et al. (2011), early Cambrian, Sekwi Formation, Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories, Canada, Section 4, 430 – 435 m above the base of section.Published as part of Gapp, I. Wesley & Lieberman, Bruce S., 2014, New olenelloid trilobites from the Northwest Territories, Canada, pp. 479-498 in Zootaxa 3866 (4) on pages 495-496, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3866.4.2, http://zenodo.org/record/24969
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
No full textWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
