1,721,645 research outputs found

    Liang jing xin ji

    No full text
    許敬宗等輯. 兩京新記 : [殘1卷] / 韋述撰.Date from preface.殘4卷: 存卷662, 664, 668, 695.框13.1 x 9.1 cm., 9行21字, 黑口, 左右雙邊, 無魚尾, 版心中鐫分冊書名, 下鐫叢書名.Xu Jingzong deng ji. Liang jing xin ji : [can 1 juan] / Wei Shu zhuan.Can 4 juan: cun juan 662, 664, 668, 695.Kuang 13.1 x 9.1 cm., 9 xing 21 zi, hei kou, zuo you shuang bian, wu yu wei, ban xin zhong juan fen ce shu ming, xia juan cong shu ming

    Chun qiu Gu liang jing zhuan jie shi 春 秋 榖 粱 經 傳 解 釋.

    No full text
    Fan Ning 氾 寧. Mi Xin 糜 信. Chun qiu Gu liang jing zhuan jie shi 春 秋 穀 梁 經 傳 解 釋. ClassiquesNumérisation effectuée à partir d'un document original.J. 5, déb. manque. De l'an [8] à l'an 15 du duc Xi 僖. Titre final : Chun qiu Gu liang jing zhuan jie shi Xi gong shang di wu 公 上 第 五. Quelques variantes par rapport à SPTK , n° 9, j. 5, pp. 8 b 10-14 a 2. Le texte est accompagné de commentaires distincts de ceux de Fan Ning 范 寧. Ceux-ci pourraient être dus, selon Luo Zhen yu, à Mi Xin 糜 信, opinion non partagée par Liu Shi bei. Repr. et étudié in MCYC , vol. 1. Étudié par Chen Tie fan in JCMS , 21 (1971), pp. 155-159. Cf. KTSL , pp. 61-64. Écr. kai call. Encre foncée. Car. taboués par substitution : shi 世, zhi 治, min 民. 178 col. simples, 20 col. simples par f., 14 car. par col. simple. Commentaires sur col. dédoublées. Marges tracées, sup. 1,9 cm, inf. 3,8 cm. Réglures 2,2 cm

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    The asarone-derived phenylpropanoids from the rhizome of Acorus calamus var. angustatus Besser

    No full text
    Bai, Yajun, Sun, Ying, Xie, Jing, Li, Bin, Bai, Yujun, Zhang, Dongxu, Liang, Jing, Xiao, Chaoni, Zhong, Aiguo, Cao, Yanjun, Zheng, Xiaohui (2020): The asarone-derived phenylpropanoids from the rhizome of Acorus calamus var. angustatus Besser. Phytochemistry (112212) 170: 1-9, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2019.112212, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2019.11221

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Fig. 3. 1H in The asarone-derived phenylpropanoids from the rhizome of Acorus calamus var. angustatus Besser

    No full text
    Fig. 3. 1H NMR Spectrum of Z-to-E conversion of compound 2b after 10 days storage in CDCl3 solution at ambient temperature under daylight conditions.Published as part of Bai, Yajun, Sun, Ying, Xie, Jing, Li, Bin, Bai, Yujun, Zhang, Dongxu, Liang, Jing, Xiao, Chaoni, Zhong, Aiguo, Cao, Yanjun & Zheng, Xiaohui, 2020, The asarone-derived phenylpropanoids from the rhizome of Acorus calamus var. angustatus Besser, pp. 1-9 in Phytochemistry (112212) 170 on page 5, DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2019.112212, http://zenodo.org/record/829249

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore