1,720,993 research outputs found
Quantum-inspired Neural Network for Conversational Emotion Recognition
No full textWe provide a novel perspective on conversational emotion recognition by drawing an analogy between the task and a complete span of quantum measurement. We characterize different steps of quantum measurement in the process of recognizing speakers' emotions in conversation, and stitch them up with a quantum-like neural network. The quantum-like layers are implemented by complex-valued operations to ensure an authentic adoption of quantum concepts, which naturally enables conversational context modeling and multimodal fusion. We borrow an existing algorithm to learn the complex-valued network weights, so that the quantum-like procedure is conducted in a data-driven manner. Our model is comparable to state-of-the-art approaches on two benchmarking datasets, and provide a quantum view to understand conversational emotion recognition
Towards Multimodal Sentiment Analysis Inspired by the Quantum Theoretical Framework
No full textIn this paper, we report on a quantum theoretical frame-work that constructs a multimodal representation for the input video sequence and infers the users' sentiments regarding a textual query-based topic. Furthermore, we report on the experimental results of the use of our quantum theoretical framework also in comparison with the state-of-The-Art methods. Finally, we describe the design and the implementation of a prototype which incorporates the proposed methods
Quantum Cognitively Motivated Decision Fusion for Video Sentiment Analysis
Get PDFVideo sentiment analysis as a decision-making process is inherently complex, involving the fusion of decisions from multiple modalities and the so-caused cognitive biases. Inspired by recent advances in quantum cognition, we show that the sentiment judgment from one modality could be incompatible with the judgment from another, i.e., the order matters and they cannot be jointly measured to produce a final decision. Thus the cognitive process exhibits ``quantum-like'' biases that cannot be captured by classical probability theories. Accordingly, we propose a fundamentally new, quantum cognitively motivated fusion strategy for predicting sentiment judgments. In particular, we formulate utterances as quantum superposition states of positive and negative sentiment judgments, and uni-modal classifiers as mutually incompatible observables, on a complex-valued Hilbert space with positive-operator valued measures. Experiments on two benchmarking datasets illustrate that our model significantly outperforms various existing decision level and a range of state-of-the-art content-level fusion approaches. The results also show that the concept of incompatibility allows effective handling of all combination patterns, including those extreme cases that are wrongly predicted by all uni-modal classifiers
Assessing the Memory Ability of Recurrent Neural Networks
Get PDFIt is known that Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) can remember, in their hidden layers, part of the semantic information expressed by a sequence (e.g., a sentence) that is being processed. Different types of recurrent units have been designed to enable RNNs to remember information over longer time spans. However, the memory abilities of different recurrent units are still theoretically and empirically unclear, thus limiting the development of more effective and explainable RNNs. To tackle the problem, in this paper, we identify and analyze the internal and external factors that affect the memory ability of RNNs, and propose a Semantic Euclidean Space to represent the semantics expressed by a sequence. Based on the Semantic Euclidean Space, a series of evaluation indicators are defined to measure the memory abilities of different recurrent units and analyze their limitations (Code is available at https://github.com/chzhang/Assessing-the-Memory-Ability-of-RNNs). These evaluation indicato..
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
