1,724,423 research outputs found

    Phlogothamnus polymaculatus Li & Song 2010

    No full text
    Phlogothamnus polymaculatus Li & Song, 2010 Figs. 13–15; Figs. 41–49. Phlogothamnus polymaculatus Li & Song, 2010: 607; Li et al., 2011: 180. Diagnosis. This species is similar to P. rugosus, but can be distinguished from the latter by the shorter pygofer appendage and the more robust style. Material examined. China: 1♂ (Holotype), Jiangxi Prov., Jiulianshan, 19 July2008, coll. Zehong Meng (GUGC); Paratypes, 1♂ 1 ♀, Jiangsu Prov., Nanjing, 24 August 2009, coll. Pei Zhang (GUGC); 3♂♂, Yunnan Prov., Lula, 20 June 2016, coll. Hongrong Li (GUGC); 1♂, Yunnan Prov., Yinjiang, 17 August 2018, coll. Yongqin Fang (GUGC); 2♂♂ 2♀♀, Yunnan Prov., Mengla, 13 June 2019, coll. Yongqin Fang (GUGC); 1♂ 1 ♀, Yunnan Prov., Lula, 20 June 2019, coll. Fenge Li (GUGC). Distribution: China (Jiangxi, Jiangsu, Yunnan) (Li & Song, 2010; Li et al., 2011). Note. The original figures of Li & Song (2010) and Li et al. (2011) lack detail of the aedeagus in ventral view. Here, we have redrawn the male genitalia.Published as part of Yao, Binbin, Zhang, Runzhi & Xing, Jichun, 2022, Review of Chinese species of genus Phlogothamnus Ishihara (Hemiptera Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae) with description of a new species, pp. 422-431 in Zootaxa 5129 (3) on page 425, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5129.3.6, http://zenodo.org/record/650125

    FIGURES 13–19. Longicornus flavipuncatus Li & Song 13 in Review of the leafhopper genus Longicornus Li & Song (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae) with description of two new species

    No full text
    FIGURES 13–19. Longicornus flavipuncatus Li & Song 13. Male pygofer side, lateral view; 14. Valve, ventral view; 15. Subgenital plate, ventral view; 16. Aedeagus, ventral view; 17. Aedeagus, lateral view; 18. Connective, dorsal view; 19. Style, dorsal view.Published as part of Fang, Yongqin & Xing, Jichun, 2018, Review of the leafhopper genus Longicornus Li & Song (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae) with description of two new species, pp. 435-442 in Zootaxa 4462 (3) on page 438, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4462.3.9, http://zenodo.org/record/144173

    Longicornus Li & Song 2008

    No full text
    Key to species (males) of Longicornus (Modified from Fang & Xing, 2019) 1. Aedeagal shaft with pair of processes arising basally (Figs. 19,20,25,26).......................................... - Aedeagal shaft with a pair of processes arising apically(Figs. 21,22,23,24,27,28,32,33)............................... 2. Aedeagal shaft with pair of furcate processes arising from ventral margin near base (Figs. 25,26)............... L. furcatus - Aedeagal shaft with two pairs of processes medially on dorsal margin (Figs.19,20)....................... L. biprocessus 3. Aedeagal shaft processes about as long as shaft (Figs. 23,24,32,33).............................................. 4 - Aedeagal shaft processes shorter than shaft (Figs. 21,22, 27,28).................................................. 4. Aedeagus with furcate process arising apically in lateral view(Figs.32,33)........................... L. grossus sp.nov. - Aedeagus with slender process arising apically in lateral view(Figs.23,24)............................ L. flavipuncatus 5. Aedeagus long, with apical processes shorter than ⅔ length of shaft (Figs.27,28)............................. L. longus - Aedeagus short and stout, with apical processes shorter than ¼ length of shaft (Figs.21,22)................. L. brevispinusPublished as part of Gou, Guangli & Xing, Jichun, 2022, Key to species of the genus Longicornus Li & Song (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae) with description of a new species, pp. 250-256 in Zootaxa 5129 (2) on page 251, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5129.2.5, http://zenodo.org/record/650091

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    FIGURE 3 in Geographic variation of the Anderson's Niviventer (Niviventer andersoni) (Thomas, 1911) (Rodentia: Muridae) of two new subspecies in China verified with cranial morphometric variables and pelage characteristics

    No full text
    FIGURE 3. Interaction of discriminant canonical function 1 with function 2 in N. andersoni samples.Published as part of Li, Song & Yang, Junxing, 2009, Geographic variation of the Anderson's Niviventer (Niviventer andersoni) (Thomas, 1911) (Rodentia: Muridae) of two new subspecies in China verified with cranial morphometric variables and pelage characteristics, pp. 48-58 in Zootaxa 2196 on page 53, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18949

    Key to species of the genus Longicornus Li & Song (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae) with description of a new species

    No full text
    Gou, Guangli, Xing, Jichun (2022): Key to species of the genus Longicornus Li & Song (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae) with description of a new species. Zootaxa 5129 (2): 250-256, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5129.2.

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore