1,721,285 research outputs found
Johns, Lewis Edward (Dick), 2315049
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/395323Surname: JOHNS. Given Name(s) or Initials: LEWIS EDWarD (DICK). Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 2315049. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 12361.229564
Item: [2016.0049.27616] "Johns, Lewis Edward (Dick), 2315049
In Loving Memory of Lewis Edward Green
No full textFuneral program for Lewis Edward Green, born May 11, 1940 and died May 25, 1991. The funeral was held May 28, 1991 at New Mount Pleasant Baptist Church, officiated by Rev. J. Carlton Allen. The funeral arrangements were made through the Lewis Funeral Home and he was buried in Fort Sam Houston National Cemetery near San Antonio, Texas
Box 41, Neg. No. 53899: Lewis Edward Dewey
No full textThis black and white photograph features a portrait of Lewis Edward Dewey - he is wearing a light dress and is sitting on the edge of a chair with his legs around an arm of the chair. John Dewey ordered the photograph. Ledger indicates the baby\u27s name is Lewis Edward.https://scholars.fhsu.edu/stafford_county/5919/thumbnail.jp
William Lewis : Edward Kremers, in Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association, 1931
No full textWilliam Lewis : Edward Kremers, in Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association, 1931. In: Revue d'histoire de la pharmacie, 20ᵉ année, n°80, 1932. p. 193
William Lewis : Edward Kremers, in Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association, 1931
No full textWilliam Lewis : Edward Kremers, in Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association, 1931. In: Revue d'histoire de la pharmacie, 20ᵉ année, n°80, 1932. p. 193
Using OGC API standards for marine data delivery : MEDIN Pilot Project
Get PDFThis report is the published product of a pilot project by the British Geological Survey (BGS), commissioned by Marine Environmental Data and Information Network (MEDIN) to investigate the implementation of the OGC API – Environmental Data Retrieval (OGC API – EDR) standard to deliver data externally from the MEDIN Geology and Geophysics Data Archive Centre (DAC).
The report details the method and technologies used in the attempt to deliver BGS DAC data using the OGC API – EDR standard.
This report could be used as an OGC API implementation guide for other DACs and as guidance on contributing to existing Open-Source projects.
The report also detail aspects of the OGC API – EDR that made it inappropriate to use for some marine environmental data, and any areas where the standard was ambiguous or challenging to implement. Also included are recommendations on how well the OGC API – EDR can support direct access to data for MEDIN, including which data types/formats can be supported.
BGS did not have sufficient resource to deliver an OGC API – EDR endpoint at the completion of the project but did implement OGC API – Features with Common Query Language (CQL) endpoint which offers similar functionality but uses different syntax. OGC API – Features + CQL was meant to be an intermediary step to delivering OGC API – EDR. BGS were unable to deliver OGCI – EDR as after spending time exploring the standard in depth it was shown to be more complex than anticipated. However, through the process of this endeavour we have made incremental steps forward towards EDR, and we were able to make a major contribution to an Open-Source Project which will benefit many geospatial data publishers and users
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
