1,726,061 research outputs found
To Thomasina H. Gist Thrall from Lewis C. Levin, October 28, 1855
No full textLetter to Thomasina H. Gist Thrall from Lewis C. Levin of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, dated October 28, 1855
Bisbee, Lewis C.
No full textCarte de Visite of Captain Lewis C. Bisbee of the 16th Maine Regiment; From NY Attorney General Collectionhttps://digitalmaine.com/arc_civilwarportraits/1769/thumbnail.jp
Bisbee, Lewis C.
No full textCarte de Visite of Captain Lewis C. Bisbee, 16th Maine Infantry, Company I; From the MacDonald Collectionhttps://digitalmaine.com/arc_civilwarportraits/1891/thumbnail.jp
Bisbee, Lewis C.
No full textCarte de Visite of Captain Lewis C. Bisbee of the 16th Maine Regiment; From NY Attorney General Collectionhttps://digitalmaine.com/arc_civilwarportraits/1769/thumbnail.jp
Bisbee, Lewis C.
No full textCarte de Visite of Captain Lewis C. Bisbee, 16th Maine Infantry, Company I; From the MacDonald Collectionhttps://digitalmaine.com/arc_civilwarportraits/1891/thumbnail.jp
Mrs. Lewis C. Paine Letter, MSS.2693
No full textAbstract: Mrs. Lewis C. Paine writes to her husband in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania about home and the death of her father-in-law.Scope and Content Note: Mrs. Lewis C. Paine writes to her husband who is dealing with family affairs at the Washington House in Philadelphia. Mrs. Paine writes about home and the death of her father-in-law. Their daughter was the grandfather's favorite and is having trouble dealing with his death.Biographical/Historical Note: Mrs. Lewis C. Paine of Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania writes to her husband in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
