1,720,966 research outputs found

    Applying a defined set of molecular markers to improve selection of resistant grapevine accessions

    No full text
    Smart breeding programs aiming at the improvement of resistance to the main grapevine diseases are based on the application of molecular markers related to resistance genes. Although many markers are available in literature, a general overview of markers associated with disease resistances and suitable for marker assisted selection (MAS) is lacking. Hence, we propose a set of highly valuable markers for MAS, creating a homogeneous way for the grapevine community to proceed in smart breeding. This set is used in the project ‘RebSelect’ at Laimburg Research Centre where a disease resistant collection is being created in collaboration with private farmers and platforms. The collection consists of interesting hybrids released by breeding programs around the world, containing resistances to the principal diseases including downy and powdery mildew but also to other less prevalent pathogens. In order to select parents with multiple resistance genes that could be used for new crosses, the collection will be screened. Here we present preliminary results of the application of a marker set related to resistances in the different accessions of the collectio

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    A Vitis hybrid “library”: comparing diverse R-loci combinations and mildew resistance levels in field

    No full text
    Nowadays, it is almost universally recognized that the viticulture of the future will require the management of grapevine pests and diseases with fewer chemical inputs. The development and the deployment of novel varieties - which are now extremely resistant to mildews as well as hold the potential to display a durable resistance during the coming years - are considered one of the most promising strategy towards an eco-friendly viticulture. In the frame of the Euregio project VITISANA, a collection of approximately 100 grapevine accessions - including (mid-)resistant genotypes derived from cross pollination between Vitis hybrid and vinifera varieties or backcrosses - was studied. Their leaf and cluster level of downy (DM) and powdery (PM) mildew resistance was evaluated in an untreated field (Marlengo, I) at veraison and harvesting time in both 2016 and 2017. In addition to attempting a true-to-type analysis, an exhaustive genetic characterization was carried out at the 12 exploitable loci associated to mildew resistance (R-loci) available in the literature to date. Besides genotypes carrying a single R-locus associated to DM or PM resistance, our findings highlighted the pyramiding of R-loci against DM in 15% and against PM in 35% of the total accessions. In particular, 56 genotypes resulted pyramided for R-loci to both mildews. Finally, combining the R-loci-based characterization of the studied traditionally bred resistant varieties with their pathogen response in untreated field, we will understand the impact of diverse R-loci assets on overcoming disease attacks under the same environmental conditions

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore