1,720,960 research outputs found
Multicentric validation of a reduced features case-mix set for predicting functional outcome after ischemic stroke in Belgium
INTRODUCTION: Ischemic stroke is the second cause of death and leading cause of severe disability worldwide. A reduced features set of CT-DRAGON (age, NIHSS on admission and pre-stroke mRS) predicts 90-day functional outcome after stroke in a single center. The current study was designed to validate this adapted CT-DRAGON score in three major Belgian hospitals, in the framework of future case-mix adjustment. METHODS: This retrospective study included stroke patients, treated by thrombolysis, thrombectomy, a combination of both or neither thrombolysis or thrombectomy (conservative treatment) in 2019. Patient characteristics and 90-day mRS were collected. Multivariable logistic regression analysis of 90-day mRS 0-2 vs. 3-6 and 0-5 vs. 6 with the reduced features set was performed. Discriminative performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). RESULTS: Thirty-three percent of patients (413/1243) underwent treatment. Majority of strokes was treated conservatively (n = 830, 67%), 18% (n = 225) was treated by thrombolysis, 7% (n = 88) by thrombectomy and 8% (n = 100) by thrombolysis and thrombectomy. Age, NIHSS and pre-stroke mRS were independently associated with 90-day mRS 0-2 (all p ≤ 0.0001, AUROC 0.88). When treatment modality was added in the model, age, NIHSS, pre-stroke mRS and treatment modality were independently associated with 90-day mRS 0-2 (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0001) AUROC 0.89). Age, NIHSS, pre-stroke mRS and treatment modality were independently associated with 90-day survival (p = 0.0001, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.008, AUROC 0.86). DISCUSSION: The reduced features set (age, NIHSS and pre-mRS) was independently associated with long-term functional outcome in a Belgian multicentric cohort, making it useful for case-mix adjustments in Belgian stroke centers. Treatment modality was associated with long-term outcome.sponsorship: This work was supported by Interreg/SafePAT: project number Euregio Maas-Rijn EMR90, Province of Limburg Belgium, Limburg Clinical Research Center (LCRC)-Anesthesiology/Neurology Programme. (Interreg/SafePAT, Province of Limburg Belgium, Limburg Clinical Research Center (LCRC)-Anesthesiology/Neurology Programme|EMR90)status: Publishe
Hospital-acquired infections after acute ischaemic stroke and its association with healthcare-related costs and functional outcome
Introduction Acute ischaemic stroke is associated with important mortality, morbidity, and healthcare-related costs. Age, pre-stroke functionality and stroke severity are important contributors to functional outcome. Stroke patients also risk developing infections during hospitalization. We sought to explore possible predictors of post-stroke infections and the relationship of post-stroke infection with healthcare-related costs and functional outcome. Methods This single-centre retrospective study included 530 patients treated for ischaemic stroke between January 2017 and February 2019. Antibiotics' administration was used as a proxy for post-stroke infection. Functional outcome at 90 days was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Total healthcare-related costs were recorded for the index hospital stay. Multivariable analysis for post-stroke infection was done with the independent factors sex, age, pre-stroke mRS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and diabetes mellitus. Results Twenty percent of patients had a post-stroke infection. NIHSS (OR 1.10, 95%CI 1.06-1.13, p < 0.0001) and diabetes mellitus (OR 2.18, 95%CI 1.28-3.71, p = 0.0042) were independent predictors for post-stroke infection. Mean total healthcare-related costs were 15,374 euro (SD 19,968; IQR 3,380-18,165), with a mean of 31,061 euro (SD 29,995; IQR 12,584-42,843) in patients with infection, compared to 11,406 euro (SD 13,987; IQR 3,083-12,726) in patients without (p < 0.0001). Median 90-days mRS was 5 (IQR 3-6) in patients with infection versus 1 (IQR 0-3.5) in patients without (p < 0.0001). Conclusions In patients, admitted for acute ischaemic stroke, stroke severity and diabetes mellitus were identified as the main predictors for post-stroke infection. Hospital-acquired infections were associated with increased costs and worse functional outcome.Interreg/SafePAT: project number Euregio Maas-Rijn EMR90. Province of Limburg Belgium. Limburg Clinical Research Center (LCRC)- Anaesthesiology/Neurology Programme
Interaction between stroke severity and quality indicators of acute stroke care : a single-center retrospective analysis
Ischemic stroke leads to substantial mortality and morbidity worldwide. Door-to-CT time, door-to-needle time (DNT), and door-to-groin time (DGT) are important quality indicators of stroke care. However, patient characteristics remain important determinants of outcome as well. In this single-center study, we investigated the interaction between these quality indicators and stroke severity regarding long-term functional outcome. All consecutive stroke patients treated at the ZOL stroke center, Genk, Belgium, between 2017 and 2020 were included in this retrospective observational study. Stroke severity was graded as "mild" if National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was equal to or lower than 8, "moderate" if NIHSS was between 9 and 15, and "severe" if NIHSS was higher than 16. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were collected before and 3 months after stroke. Ordinal regression analysis with correction for patient characteristics of functional outcome was done. A total of 1255 patients were included, of which 84% suffered an ischemic CVA (n = 1052) and 16% a TIA (n = 203). The proportion of patients treated conservatively or with thrombolysis, thrombectomy, or the combination of both differed according to stroke severity (p < 0.0001). Door-to-CT time was longer in mild and moderate stroke (p < 0.0001). Median DNT also differed between stroke categories: 46 (IQR 31-70) min for mild vs. 36 (25-56) min for moderate vs. 30 (21-45) min for severe stroke (p = 0.0002). Median DGT did not differ between stroke severity categories (p = 0.15). NIHSS on admission and pre-stroke mRS were independently associated with mRS at 90 days. Operational performance, reflected in door-to-CT time and DNT, was worse in patients with mild and moderate stroke severity. DNT was also associated with functional outcome in our center, along with pre-stroke mRS, NIHSS on admission and age
Évaluation de la pression intra-ballonnet de la sonde endotrachéale et état des lieux de gonflage du ballonnet chez l'espèce équine sur 25 anésthésies générales réalisées au CISCO
Ce manuscrit met en évidence les enjeux pratiques, médicaux et humains liés au gonflage du ballonnet de la sonde endotrachéale en anesthésie chez l’espèce équine. Ce gonflage du ballonnet représente un geste technique qui doit être maitrisé ou supervisé par un praticien formé, et peut amener à des complications qui sont décrites en première partie de manuscrit. En deuxième partie de manuscrit, une étude prospective menée au sein du Centre International de la Santé du Cheval d’Oniris sur 25 anesthésies générales est présentée. Un état des lieux de la pratique du gonflage du ballonnet au sein de cet établissement est réalisé, menant à une étude comparative entre les différents rangs universitaires des opérateurs et leurs différentes méthodes. Une analyse de l’influence des paramètres intrinsèques de l’équidé, de la méthode de gonflage du ballonnet, du rang universitaire de l’opérateur ou encore de la taille de la sonde endotrachéale utilisées sur la pression intra-ballonnet insufflé est menée. Enfin, l’évolution de la pression intra-ballonnet au cours de l’anesthésie est décrite au sein de cet échantillon d’étude. Ce manuscrit vise à questionner la pertinence du monitoring de la pression intra-ballonnet en anesthésie équine, ainsi que la formation au geste technique de gonflage du ballonnet en milieu universitaire
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
