1,721,665 research outputs found

    Dracoleuctra, a new wingless stonefly genus from southern Oregon, U.S.A. (Plecoptera: Leuctridae)

    No full text
    Lee, Jonathan J., Baumann, Richard W. (2022): Dracoleuctra, a new wingless stonefly genus from southern Oregon, U.S.A. (Plecoptera: Leuctridae). Zootaxa 5115 (2): 258-266, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5115.2.

    Two Interesting New Species Of Isoperla From Northern California (Plecoptera: Perlodidae)

    No full text
    Baumann, Richard W., Lee, Jonathan J. (2009): Two Interesting New Species Of Isoperla From Northern California (Plecoptera: Perlodidae). Illiesia 5 (1): 1-10, DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.475899

    Neaviperla Is A Valid Stonefly Genus In North America (Plecoptera: Chloroperlidae)

    No full text
    Baumann, Richard W., Lee, Jonathan J. (2014): Neaviperla Is A Valid Stonefly Genus In North America (Plecoptera: Chloroperlidae). Illiesia 10 (9): 80-87, DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.475275

    Paracapnia Humboldta (Plecoptera: Capniidae), A New Winter Stonefly From Northern California, U.S.A.

    No full text
    Baumann, Richard W., Lee, Jonathan J. (2007): Paracapnia Humboldta (Plecoptera: Capniidae), A New Winter Stonefly From Northern California, U.S.A. Illiesia 3 (3): 17-19, DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.475864

    FIGURES 7–8 in Dracoleuctra, a new wingless stonefly genus from southern Oregon, U.S.A. (Plecoptera: Leuctridae)

    No full text
    FIGURES 7–8. Dracoleuctra siskiyou: 7. Male terminalia, dorsal, partially cleared, segment nine removed. 8. Male paraprocts, ventral, partially cleared.Published as part of Lee, Jonathan J. & Baumann, Richard W., 2022, Dracoleuctra, a new wingless stonefly genus from southern Oregon, U.S.A. (Plecoptera: Leuctridae), pp. 258-266 in Zootaxa 5115 (2) on page 261, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5115.2.4, http://zenodo.org/record/635240

    Figs. 1-3 in A New Species Of Paracapnia From California (Plecoptera: Capniidae)

    No full text
    Figs. 1-3. Paracapnia baumanni: 1. Male terminalia, lateral. 2. Male terminalia, dorsal. 3. Female terminalia, ventral.Published as part of Kondratieff, Boris C. & Lee, Jonathan J., 2010, A New Species Of Paracapnia From California (Plecoptera: Capniidae), pp. 206-209 in Illiesia 6 (13) on page 207, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.475978

    Figs. 1-2 in Neaviperla Is A Valid Stonefly Genus In North America (Plecoptera: Chloroperlidae)

    No full text
    Figs. 1-2. Neaviperla forcipata, Terminalia: 1. Male, dorsal. 2. Male, lateral.Published as part of Baumann, Richard W. & Lee, Jonathan J., 2014, Neaviperla Is A Valid Stonefly Genus In North America (Plecoptera: Chloroperlidae), pp. 80-87 in Illiesia 10 (9) on page 82, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.475275

    FIGURES 5–6 in Dracoleuctra, a new wingless stonefly genus from southern Oregon, U.S.A. (Plecoptera: Leuctridae)

    No full text
    FIGURES 5–6. Dracoleuctra siskiyou: 5. Male terminalia, dorsal. 6. Male terminalia, ventral, partially cleared, segment nine removed.Published as part of Lee, Jonathan J. & Baumann, Richard W., 2022, Dracoleuctra, a new wingless stonefly genus from southern Oregon, U.S.A. (Plecoptera: Leuctridae), pp. 258-266 in Zootaxa 5115 (2) on page 260, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5115.2.4, http://zenodo.org/record/635240

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore