1,721,012 research outputs found

    Contestation of Science, Post-truth Regimes and Emotions: A Review

    No full text
    This chapter delves into the significant role of emotions in contemporary epistemic conflicts, particularly within the online realm. Exploring the implicit norms and expectations governing emotional expression, known as “feelings rules”, uncovers valuable insights into the underlying power dynamics at play. Hence, it underscores the necessity of examining how emotions are moderated within online groups and the impact of societal structures on emotional expression, pointing out the gendered and racialised nature of feeling rules. By understanding the role of digital platforms in influencing emotional expression and interactional dynamics, this chapter suggests that we can gain deeper insights into the mechanisms of epistemic conflicts and misinformation spread. Contemporary epistemic conflicts are characterised not only by the increased accessibility to science-related discussion through the web, but also by the active role of politics—and, particularly, far-right actors. The chapter argues that focusing on how emotions circulate, on how the feeling rules towards science are established in online epistemic conflicts, and on the role of political actors would be particularly fruitful, because doing so enables us to analyse the transformations in the public attitudes towards science, as well as the social and political implications of these transformations

    Er det kvalitative multiple casestudie anvendeligt i sundhedstjenesteforskning?

    No full text
    Interventions aiming at creating change in the healthcare sector are mainly explored in a randomized controlled trial. This method only to a small extent explores how and under what circumstances interventions produce an effect. The purpose of this paper is to analyze and discuss a qualitative multiple case study as an alternative research strategy. Drawing on empirical examples from an accomplished case study, where the introduction of the concept "Motivational Interviewing" into preventive consultations in ten clinics was investigated, the paper emphasizes three dimensions in the research strategy: First it shows the importance of addressing local actors' construction of meaning, secondly it emphasizes the value of combining process and effect in a synthetic strategy, and thirdly it stresses the consequences of a static/dynamic perspective on change. In conclusion a qualitative multiple case study is a valuable supplement to the existing range of methods in health science.</p

    Hvorfor er det svært at ændre klinisk praksis?

    No full text
    Udgivelsesdato: Mart

    Hvorfor er det svært at ændre klinisk praksis?

    No full text
    Udgivelsesdato: Mart
    corecore