1,720,990 research outputs found
Psoriatic lesions in patients with chronic liver disease are distinct from psoriasis vulgaris lesions, as judged on basis of integrin adhesion receptors
No full textPsoriatic lesions are relatively frequent in patients with chronic liver disease. Furthermore, therapy with interferons tends to exacerbate the symptoms. The pathogenesis of psoriatic lesions is unclear. An important question is whether such lesions may be linked to the underlying chronic liver disease in these patients, or whether they are incidental manifestations of psoriasis vulgaris. We collected biopsy specimens from involved and uninvolved skin areas of chronic liver disease patients with psoriatic manifestations, as well as from psoriasis vulgaris patients, and investigated the patterns of integrin adhesion receptors by means of immunohistochemical methods. Integrin expression is known to be characteristically altered in psoriasis vulgaris. We found some of these changes in chronic liver disease psoriatic lesions-namely pericellular redistribution and suprabasal expression of the basement membrane receptor alpha 6 beta 4 and of the intercellular integrins alpha 2 beta 1 and alpha 3 beta 1. However, psoriasis vulgaris causes two other typical changes: One is the induction of the prototype fibronectin receptor alpha 5 beta 1, and the other is the alteration of integrin expression in areas of the epidermis that are macroscopically normal. These two changes were not found in chronic liver disease psoriasis biopsy specimens in 14 patients investigated. Thus integrin expression may be useful in differentiating chronic liver disease psoriatic lesions from psoriasis vulgaris lesions. Even though the two types of lesions are indistinguishable on inspection or by their histological features, they may be caused by distinct pathogenetic mechanisms. It remains to be seen whether the underlying chronic liver disease has a role, albeit indirect, in such mechanisms
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Psoriatic lesions in patients with chronic liver disease are distinct from psoriasis vulgaris lesions, as judged on basis of integrin adhesion receptors
No full text- …
