1,721,004 research outputs found
Calibrating LISA Pathfinder raw data into femto-g differential accelerometry
Full text linkLISA Pathfinder is an in-flight test of the local sources of acceleration noise in LISA. The acceleration noise level in LISA Pathfinder is measured by the residual differential acceleration Δg between the two test masses once the coupling to the spacecraft motion has been removed. The full process from raw data to Δg passes through a series of calibration experiments and different data elaboration procedure which are thoroughly used during the mission and represent the baseline for any other further investigation. © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
Laser Frequency Noise Stabilisation and Interferometer Path Length Differences on LISA Pathfinder
Full text linkPreliminary results on the suppression of sensing cross-talk in LISA Pathfinder
Full text linkIn the original paper describing the first measurements performed with LISA Pathfinder, a bulge in the acceleration noise was shown in the 200 mHz - 20 mHz frequency band. This bulge noise originated from cross-coupling of spacecraft motion into the longitudinal readout and it was shown that it is possible to subtract this cross-talk noise. We discuss here the model that was used for subtraction as well as an alternative approach to suppress the cross talk by realignment of the test masses. Such a realignment was performed after preliminary analysis of a dedicated cross-talk experiment, and we show the resulting noise suppression. Since then, further experiments have been performed to investigate the cross-coupling behaviour, however analysis of these experiments is still on-going. © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
Coupling of relative intensity noise and pathlength noise to the length measurement in the optical metrology system of LISA Pathfinder
Full text linkRadiation pressure calibration and test mass reflectivities for LISA Pathfinder
Full text linkThis paper describes a series of experiments which were carried out during the main operations of LISA Pathfinder. These experiments were performed by modulating the power of the measurement and reference beams. In one series of experiments the beams were sequentially switched on and off. In the other series of experiments the powers of the beams were modulated within 0.1% and 1% of the constant power. These experiments use recordings of the total power measured on the photodiodes to infer the properties of the Optical Metrology System (OMS), such as reflectivities of the test masses and change of the photodiode efficiencies with time. In the first case the powers are back propagated from the different photodiodes to the same place on the optical bench to express the unknown quantities in the measurement with the complimentary photodiode measurements. They are combined in the way that the only unknown left is the test mass reflectivities. The second experiment compared two estimates of the force applied to the test masses due to the radiation pressure that appears because of the beam modulations. One estimate of the force is inferred from the measurements of the powers on the photodiodes and propagation of this measurement to the test masses. The other estimation of the force is done by calculating it from the change in the main scientific output of the instrument – differential displacement of the two test masses
LISA Pathfinder closed-loop analysis: a model breakdown of the in-loop observables
No full textISSN:1742-6588ISSN:1742-6596ISSN:1742-659
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
